Suppr超能文献

桡骨远端骨折中掌侧锁定钢板与外固定的比较:一项荟萃分析。

Volar locking plate versus external fixation in distal radius fractures: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Maccagnano Giuseppe, Noia Giovanni, Vicenti Giovanni, Baglioni Marco, Masciale Maria Rosa, Cassano Giuseppe Danilo, Vitiello Raffaele, Moretti Biagio, Pesce Vito

机构信息

Orthopedic and Trauma Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti di Foggia.

University of Foggia.

出版信息

Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021 Mar 31;13(1):9147. doi: 10.4081/or.2021.9147. eCollection 2021 Mar 30.

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of plate or external fixator treatments in distal radius fractures, based not only on clinical and radiographic parameters but on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) parameters. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed when conducting this systematic review. The Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (RAMSTAR) checklist was additionally consulted in order to ensure a high-quality methodological process, encompassing such elements as an 'a priori' design, independent reviews and comprehensive search. The literature search was carried out on PubMed, MEDLINE and Scopus. The search terms used were "Radius fracture AND osteosynthesis", "Wrist fracture AND external fixator" and "Wrist fracture AND plate". Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts. To determine inter-reviewer agreement, a k score was calculated after each screening state. Of the 5753 studies collected through the initial databases search, two studies were included in the final meta-analysis (125 treated with external fixator vs 132 with volar plate). There was a substantial inter-reviewer agreement as to the title (0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.79) abstract (0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.83) and fulltext screening stages (0.89; 95%CI, 0.67-1). The meta-analysis reported a mean difference equal to 0.00 (95%CI= -0.05 - 0.05), in accordance with I= 0% and p test for the heterogeneity value=0.089. This meta analysis confirms and quantifies that the two techniques are superimposable as regards the quality of life reported by patients at least one year of follow-up.

摘要

本荟萃分析的目的是评估钢板或外固定器治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效,评估不仅基于临床和影像学参数,还基于健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)参数。进行这项系统评价时遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。此外,还参考了修订后的多重系统评价评估(RAMSTAR)清单,以确保方法学过程的高质量,包括“预先”设计、独立评价和全面检索等要素。在PubMed、MEDLINE和Scopus上进行了文献检索。使用的检索词为“桡骨骨折与骨合成”、“腕部骨折与外固定器”以及“腕部骨折与钢板”。两名评价者独立筛选标题、摘要和全文。为了确定评价者间的一致性,在每个筛选阶段后计算k值。通过初始数据库检索收集的5753项研究中,有两项研究纳入了最终的荟萃分析(125例接受外固定器治疗,132例接受掌侧钢板治疗)。在标题(0.73;95%置信区间,0.67 - 0.79)、摘要(0.65;95%CI,0.46 - 0.83)和全文筛选阶段(0.89;95%CI,0.67 - 1),评价者间存在高度一致性。荟萃分析报告的平均差异等于0.00(95%CI = -0.05 - 0.05),根据I = 0%以及异质性值的p检验 = 0.089。这项荟萃分析证实并量化了,至少在随访一年时,这两种技术在患者报告的生活质量方面是重叠的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ee6/8082167/36a0a6749381/or-13-1-9147-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验