Department of Epidemiology (FA40), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):715-725. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0647-0.
The EQ-5D is a widely used preference-based instrument to measure health-related quality of life. Some methodological drawbacks of its three-level version (EQ-5D-3L) prompted development of a new format (EQ-5D-5L). There is no clear evidence that the new format outperforms the standard version.
The objective of this study was to make a head-to-head comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in a discrete choice model setting giving special attention to the consistency and logical ordering of coefficients for the attribute levels and to the differences in health-state values.
Using efficient designs, 240 pairs of EQ-5D-3L health states and 240 pairs of EQ-5D-5L health states were generated in a pairwise choice format. The study included 3698 Dutch general population respondents, analyzed their responses using a conditional logit model, and compared the values elicited by EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L for different health states.
No inconsistencies or illogical ordering of level coefficients were observed in either version. The proportion of severe health states with low values was higher in the EQ-5D-5L than in the EQ-5D-3L, and the proportion of mild/moderate states was lower in the EQ-5D-5L than in the EQ-5D-3L. Moreover, differences were observed in the relative weights of the attributes.
Overall distribution of health-state values derived from a large representative sample using the same measurement framework for both versions showed differences between the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L. However, even small differences in the phrasing (language) of the descriptive system or in the valuation protocol can produce differences in values between these two versions.
EQ-5D 是一种广泛使用的偏好量表,用于测量与健康相关的生活质量。其三级版本(EQ-5D-3L)存在一些方法学上的缺陷,促使开发了一种新的格式(EQ-5D-5L)。目前尚无明确证据表明新格式优于标准版本。
本研究旨在通过离散选择模型设置,对 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 进行头对头比较,特别关注属性水平的系数一致性和逻辑顺序,以及健康状态值的差异。
使用有效设计,在成对选择格式中生成 240 对 EQ-5D-3L 健康状态和 240 对 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态。该研究包括 3698 名荷兰普通人群受访者,使用条件逻辑回归模型分析他们的反应,并比较 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 对不同健康状态的评估值。
在两种版本中均未观察到水平系数的不一致或逻辑顺序混乱。EQ-5D-5L 中低值严重健康状态的比例高于 EQ-5D-3L,EQ-5D-5L 中轻度/中度状态的比例低于 EQ-5D-3L。此外,属性的相对权重也存在差异。
使用相同的测量框架从大型代表性样本中得出的健康状态值的总体分布表明,EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 之间存在差异。但是,描述性系统或估值方案中的措辞(语言)即使略有差异,也会导致这两种版本之间的价值差异。