• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Decipher活检基因组评分翻倍与后续监测活检时的疾病重新分类相关,但与根治性前列腺切除术中的不良特征无关。

Doubling of Decipher Biopsy Genomic Score Is Related to Disease Reclassification on Subsequent Surveillance Biopsy but Not Adverse Features on Radical Prostatectomy.

作者信息

Ghabili Kamyar, Paulson Nathan, Syed Jamil S, Nawaf Cayce B, Khajir Ghazal, Martin Darryl T, Onofrey John, Leapman Michael S, Levi Angelique, Weinreb Jeffrey C, Humphrey Peter A, Sprenkle Preston C

机构信息

Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Case Rep Urol. 2021 Mar 17;2021:2687416. doi: 10.1155/2021/2687416. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/2687416
PMID:33936831
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8054861/
Abstract

The utility of serial Decipher biopsy scores in a true active surveillance population is still unknown. In a man on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, a doubling of the Decipher biopsy score within genomic low-risk category from first to the second biopsy related to biopsy reclassification to Gleason grade group 4 on the third biopsy. However, the final pathology at radical prostatectomy showed Gleason grade group 2 with an organ-confined disease. This case suggests that the genomic risk category of Decipher biopsy scores during active surveillance may be more informative than either the interval genomic score change or the biopsy Gleason grade group.

摘要

在真正的主动监测人群中,连续的Decipher活检评分的效用仍然未知。在一名接受低风险前列腺癌主动监测的男性中,在基因组低风险类别内,从第一次活检到第二次活检,Decipher活检评分翻倍,这与第三次活检时活检重新分类为Gleason分级组4相关。然而,根治性前列腺切除术时的最终病理显示为Gleason分级组2且疾病局限于器官内。该病例表明,主动监测期间Decipher活检评分的基因组风险类别可能比基因组评分的间隔变化或活检Gleason分级组更具信息价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ac/8054861/103a6e8fd5ac/CRIU2021-2687416.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ac/8054861/103a6e8fd5ac/CRIU2021-2687416.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16ac/8054861/103a6e8fd5ac/CRIU2021-2687416.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Doubling of Decipher Biopsy Genomic Score Is Related to Disease Reclassification on Subsequent Surveillance Biopsy but Not Adverse Features on Radical Prostatectomy.Decipher活检基因组评分翻倍与后续监测活检时的疾病重新分类相关,但与根治性前列腺切除术中的不良特征无关。
Case Rep Urol. 2021 Mar 17;2021:2687416. doi: 10.1155/2021/2687416. eCollection 2021.
2
Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.在多参数前列腺磁共振成像-超声融合靶向活检中,前列腺癌基因组分类器与Gleason分级组的相关性比前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分更强。
Urology. 2019 Mar;125:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.22特征基因组分类器与前列腺癌主动监测期间活检Gleason分级升级之间的关联
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Feb 11;37:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.01.008. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Evaluation of predictors of unfavorable pathological features in men eligible for active surveillance using radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-institutional study.利用根治性前列腺切除术标本评估适合主动监测的男性患者不良病理特征的预测因素:一项多机构研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;46(12):1156-1161. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw130. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
5
Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.在预测活检中出现格里森模式 4 的患者的器官局限型前列腺癌方面的局限性:对主动监测的影响。
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.076. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
6
Radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer following initial active surveillance: results from a prospective observational study.主动监测后行低危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术:一项前瞻性观察研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Aug;62(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
7
Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.低危 Gleason 评分 6 与中危 Gleason 评分 3+4 前列腺癌的病理和肿瘤学结局比较:主动监测的考虑因素。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.116. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.初始 Gleason 分级对前列腺癌主动监测期间结局的影响。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;1(5):386-394. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.基于人群的研究:预测前列腺癌 Gleason6 评分患者主动监测不良病理的因素。
J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.034. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
10
Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis.在确定最终Gleason评分和临床风险类别方面,经会阴前列腺活检比经直肠活检更准确吗?一项对比分析。
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116 Suppl 3:26-30. doi: 10.1111/bju.13165. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Subsequent Biopsy in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.主动监测管理的低危前列腺癌男性患者的系列多参数磁共振成像和后续活检的结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Jan;7(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 27.
2
Stability of a 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score in Serial Testing of Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.在早期前列腺癌主动监测的男性中进行连续检测时,17 基因基因组前列腺评分的稳定性。
J Urol. 2019 Oct;202(4):696-701. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000271. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
3
Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.
在多参数前列腺磁共振成像-超声融合靶向活检中,前列腺癌基因组分类器与Gleason分级组的相关性比前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分更强。
Urology. 2019 Mar;125:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
4
Biomarkers in active surveillance.主动监测中的生物标志物。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):155-159. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.26.
5
New Genetic Markers for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌的新型遗传标志物
Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Feb;43(1):7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
6
Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.前列腺癌的主动监测:对用于风险分层的临床病理变量和生物标志物的系统评价
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):619-26. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Oct 31.