Viswanath Aparna, Bale Steve, Trail Ian
Dept of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom.
Upper Limb Unit, Dept of Orthopaedics, Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Hall Lane, Appley Bridge, Lancashire, WN6 9EP, United Kingdom.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Apr 15;17:267-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.005. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) have expanded over recent years. Whilst cuff tear arthropathy is an accepted indication, the results of its use in those without arthritis is not clear. The aim of this article is to review the literature on RTSA for massive rotator cuff tears without associated arthritis.
A systematic review search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to find all studies with clinical outcomes on RTSA performed for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) without arthritis.
Of the 160 studies produced by the search, a detailed analysis found 11 articles to be included in this review. There was variability in the implant style used and the outcome measures utilised, but all studies found improvement in the outcome following RTSA. Many studies advised judicious use following high complication rates, and caution was advised in those patients with pre-operatively preserved active forward elevation.
The available evidence suggests that RTSA is a reliable option in older patients with persistent pain and lack of function following MIRCT even without arthritis. However, as outcomes are not significantly worse following failed rotator cuff repair, joint preserving options in the younger age group should be carefully considered in light of the relatively high complication rate associated with RTSA.
IV.
近年来,反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的适应症有所扩大。虽然肩袖撕裂性关节病是公认的适应症,但其在无关节炎患者中的应用效果尚不清楚。本文旨在综述有关RTSA治疗无相关关节炎的巨大肩袖撕裂的文献。
根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价检索,以查找所有关于RTSA治疗无关节炎的巨大不可修复肩袖撕裂(MIRCT)的临床结果研究。
在检索出的160项研究中,详细分析发现11篇文章纳入本综述。所使用的植入物类型和所采用的结局指标存在差异,但所有研究均发现RTSA术后结局有所改善。许多研究建议在高并发症发生率后谨慎使用,对于术前保留主动前屈的患者建议谨慎操作。
现有证据表明,即使无关节炎,RTSA对于MIRCT后持续疼痛和功能障碍的老年患者是一种可靠的选择。然而,由于肩袖修复失败后的结局并无明显更差,鉴于RTSA相关并发症发生率相对较高,对于年轻患者应仔细考虑保留关节的选择。
IV级。