• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估Thought Spot的可用性和用户参与度——一种针对过渡年龄青年的数字心理健康求助解决方案。

Assessing the usability and user engagement of Thought Spot - A digital mental health help-seeking solution for transition-aged youth.

作者信息

Shi Jenny, Lo Brian, Wong Howard W, Hollenberg Elisa, Sanches Marcos, Abi-Jaoudé Alexxa, Chaim Gloria, Cleverley Kristin, Henderson Joanna, Johnson Andrew, Levinson Andrea, Pham Quynh, Robb Janine, Voineskos Aristotle, Wiljer David

机构信息

Office of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1025 Queen Street West, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada.

Information Management Group, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 100 Stokes Street, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2021 Mar 26;24:100386. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100386. eCollection 2021 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100386
PMID:33936952
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8079441/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perceived usability of and user engagement with a digital platform (Thought Spot) designed to enhance mental health and wellness help-seeking among transition-aged youth (TAY; 17-29-years old).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Survey responses and usage patterns were collected as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of Thought Spot. Participants given Thought Spot completed an adapted Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (USE) Questionnaire to measure perceived usability of the platform. User engagement patterns on Thought Spot were examined using analytics data collected throughout the study (March 2018-June 2019).

RESULTS

A total of 131 transition-aged participants completed the USE questionnaire and logged on to Thought Spot at least once. Ease of learning scored higher than ease of use, usefulness and satisfaction. Participants identified numerous strengths and challenges related to usability, visual appeal, functionality and usefulness of the content. In terms of user engagement, most participants stopped using the platform after 3 weeks. Participants searched and were interested in a variety of resources, including mental health, counselling and social services.

DISCUSSION

Participants reported mixed experiences while using Thought Spot and exhibited low levels of long-term user engagement. User satisfaction, the willingness to recommend Thought Spot to others, and the willingness for future use appeared to be influenced by content relevance, ease of learning, available features, and other contextual factors. Analysis of the types of resources viewed and searches conducted by TAY end-users provided insight into their behaviour and needs.

CONCLUSION

Users had mixed perceptions about the usability of Thought Spot, which may have contributed to the high attrition rate. User satisfaction and engagement appears to be influenced by content relevance, ease of learning, and the types of features available. Further investigation to understand the contextual factors that affect TAYs' adoption and engagement with digital mental health tools is required.

摘要

目的

评估一个旨在促进转型期青年(17 - 29岁)寻求心理健康和幸福感帮助的数字平台(Thought Spot)的感知可用性和用户参与度。

材料与方法

作为评估Thought Spot疗效的随机对照试验的一部分,收集了调查回复和使用模式。使用Thought Spot的参与者完成了一份改编后的有用性、满意度和易用性(USE)问卷,以衡量该平台的感知可用性。通过整个研究(2018年3月 - 2019年6月)收集的分析数据,研究了Thought Spot上的用户参与模式。

结果

共有131名转型期参与者完成了USE问卷,并至少登录过一次Thought Spot。易学性得分高于易用性、有用性和满意度。参与者指出了与内容的可用性、视觉吸引力、功能和有用性相关的众多优点和挑战。在用户参与方面,大多数参与者在3周后停止使用该平台。参与者搜索并对包括心理健康、咨询和社会服务在内的各种资源感兴趣。

讨论

参与者在使用Thought Spot时报告了不同的体验,并且长期用户参与度较低。用户满意度、向他人推荐Thought Spot的意愿以及未来使用的意愿似乎受到内容相关性、易学性、可用功能和其他背景因素的影响。对转型期青年最终用户查看的资源类型和进行的搜索的分析,为他们的行为和需求提供了见解。

结论

用户对Thought Spot的可用性看法不一,这可能导致了高流失率。用户满意度和参与度似乎受到内容相关性、易学性和可用功能类型的影响。需要进一步调查以了解影响转型期青年采用和参与数字心理健康工具的背景因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/0a1a6c8abaaa/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/b7b0be9b829c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/989922376622/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/76149a7b9ba1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/1427d10c250e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/0a1a6c8abaaa/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/b7b0be9b829c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/989922376622/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/76149a7b9ba1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/1427d10c250e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/8079441/0a1a6c8abaaa/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the usability and user engagement of Thought Spot - A digital mental health help-seeking solution for transition-aged youth.评估Thought Spot的可用性和用户参与度——一种针对过渡年龄青年的数字心理健康求助解决方案。
Internet Interv. 2021 Mar 26;24:100386. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100386. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Postsecondary Student Engagement With a Mental Health App and Online Platform (Thought Spot): Qualitative Study of User Experience.高等院校学生使用心理健康应用程序和在线平台(Thought Spot)的情况:用户体验的定性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Apr 2;8(4):e23447. doi: 10.2196/23447.
3
Surveying the Role of Analytics in Evaluating Digital Mental Health Interventions for Transition-Aged Youth: Scoping Review.审视分析在评估转型期青少年数字心理健康干预措施中的作用:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jun 25;7(6):e15942. doi: 10.2196/15942.
4
Effects of a Mobile and Web App (Thought Spot) on Mental Health Help-Seeking Among College and University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动应用程序和网络应用程序(Thought Spot)对大学生心理健康求助的影响:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 30;22(10):e20790. doi: 10.2196/20790.
5
Enhancing Self-Efficacy for Help-Seeking Among Transition-Aged Youth in Postsecondary Settings With Mental Health and/or Substance Use Concerns, Using Crowd-Sourced Online and Mobile Technologies: The Thought Spot Protocol.利用众包在线和移动技术,提高有心理健康和/或物质使用问题的高等教育阶段过渡年龄青年寻求帮助的自我效能:思维点协议
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Nov 4;5(4):e201. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6446.
6
Characterizing User Engagement With a Digital Intervention for Pain Self-management Among Youth With Sickle Cell Disease and Their Caregivers: Subanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.描述数字干预在镰状细胞病患儿及其照顾者疼痛自我管理中的用户参与情况:一项随机对照试验的亚组分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 30;24(8):e40096. doi: 10.2196/40096.
7
An e-Mental Health Resource for COVID-19-Associated Stress Reduction: Mixed Methods Study of Reach, Usability, and User Perceptions.一种用于减轻 COVID-19 相关压力的电子心理健康资源:关于覆盖面、可用性和用户认知的混合方法研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Aug 26;9(8):e39885. doi: 10.2196/39885.
8
A Web- and Mobile-Based Map of Mental Health Resources for Postsecondary Students (Thought Spot): Protocol for an Economic Evaluation.基于网络和移动设备的高等院校学生心理健康资源地图(思维点):经济评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Mar 29;7(3):e83. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9478.
9
Outcomes of Best-Practice Guided Digital Mental Health Interventions for Youth and Young Adults with Emerging Symptoms: Part II. A Systematic Review of User Experience Outcomes.最佳实践引导的数字心理健康干预措施对出现症状的青年和年轻成年人的结果:第二部分。用户体验结果的系统评价。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Jun;27(2):476-508. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00468-5. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
10
The Optimization of an eHealth Solution (Thought Spot) with Transition-Aged Youth in Postsecondary Settings: Participatory Design Research.在高等教育环境中针对过渡年龄段青年优化电子健康解决方案(Thought Spot):参与式设计研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 6;20(3):e79. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8102.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalization variables in digital mental health interventions for depression and anxiety in adolescents and youth: a scoping review.青少年和青年抑郁与焦虑数字心理健康干预中的个性化变量:一项范围综述
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 15;7:1500220. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1500220. eCollection 2025.
2
Digital support for female students in physical education universities in Japan.日本体育大学对女学生的数字支持。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 14;15(1):16777. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98921-0.
3
Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Children and Adolescents.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of a Mobile and Web App (Thought Spot) on Mental Health Help-Seeking Among College and University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动应用程序和网络应用程序(Thought Spot)对大学生心理健康求助的影响:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 30;22(10):e20790. doi: 10.2196/20790.
2
Digital Health and Engagement-Looking Behind the Measures and Methods.数字健康与参与度——探寻背后的措施与方法
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10918.
3
Surveying the Role of Analytics in Evaluating Digital Mental Health Interventions for Transition-Aged Youth: Scoping Review.
数字心理健康干预对儿童和青少年的有效性。
Children (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;12(3):353. doi: 10.3390/children12030353.
4
Engagement in computerized cognitive training instructions by older people. A within-subject design to evaluate comprehension and acceptability of serious games instructions.老年人参与计算机化认知训练指导。一项评估严肃游戏指导的理解性和可接受性的受试者内设计。
Front Aging. 2025 Feb 3;6:1297704. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1297704. eCollection 2025.
5
Mental Health Care Navigation Tools in Australia: Infoveillance Study.澳大利亚心理健康保健导航工具:信息监测研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 22;10:e60079. doi: 10.2196/60079.
6
Acceptability and Utility of a Smartphone App to Support Adolescent Mental Health (BeMe): Program Evaluation Study.支持青少年心理健康的智能手机应用(BeMe)的可接受性和实用性:方案评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Aug 28;11:e47183. doi: 10.2196/47183.
7
The Role of Aesthetics in Intentions to Use Digital Health Interventions.美学在使用数字健康干预措施意图中的作用。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Jun 22;2(6):e0000274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000274. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
The Potential Impact of Adjunct Digital Tools and Technology to Help Distressed and Suicidal Men: An Integrative Review.辅助数字工具和技术对帮助处于困境和有自杀倾向男性的潜在影响:一项综合综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;12:796371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796371. eCollection 2021.
9
Online mental health interventions designed for students in higher education: A user-centered perspective.以用户为中心视角设计的针对高等教育学生的在线心理健康干预措施。
Internet Interv. 2021 Oct 9;26:100468. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100468. eCollection 2021 Dec.
审视分析在评估转型期青少年数字心理健康干预措施中的作用:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jun 25;7(6):e15942. doi: 10.2196/15942.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic: The 'black swan' for mental health care and a turning point for e-health.新冠疫情:心理健康护理的“黑天鹅”与电子健康的转折点。
Internet Interv. 2020 Apr;20:100317. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情期间中国的在线心理健康服务。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e17-e18. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30077-8. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Young People's Online Help-Seeking and Mental Health Difficulties: Systematic Narrative Review.年轻人的在线求助行为与心理健康问题:系统叙事综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 19;21(11):e13873. doi: 10.2196/13873.
7
The Service of Research Analytics to Optimize Digital Health Evidence Generation: Multilevel Case Study.优化数字健康证据生成的研究分析服务:多层次案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 11;21(11):e14849. doi: 10.2196/14849.
8
Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis.目标 用户对心理健康应用程序的参与度:系统检索与基于小组的使用情况分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e14567. doi: 10.2196/14567.
9
Use of mobile apps and technologies in child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review.移动应用程序和技术在儿童和青少年心理健康中的应用:系统评价。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):161-166. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300093. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
10
A Framework for Analyzing and Measuring Usage and Engagement Data (AMUsED) in Digital Interventions: Viewpoint.数字干预中分析和测量使用情况及参与度数据的框架(AMUsED):观点
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 15;21(2):e10966. doi: 10.2196/10966.