Zhang Wanying, Venkataraghavan Sowmya, Hetmanski Jacqueline B, Leslie Elizabeth J, Marazita Mary L, Feingold Eleanor, Weinberg Seth M, Ruczinski Ingo, Taub Margaret A, Scott Alan F, Ray Debashree, Beaty Terri H
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Department of Human Genetics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Apr 16;9:621018. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.621018. eCollection 2021.
Two large studies of case-parent trios ascertained through a proband with a non-syndromic orofacial cleft (OFC, which includes cleft lip and palate, cleft lip alone, or cleft palate alone) were used to test for possible gene-environment (G × E) interaction between genome-wide markers (both observed and imputed) and self-reported maternal exposure to smoking, alcohol consumption, and multivitamin supplementation during pregnancy. The parent studies were as follows: GENEVA, which included 1,939 case-parent trios recruited largely through treatment centers in Europe, the United States, and Asia, and 1,443 case-parent trios from the Pittsburgh Orofacial Cleft Study (POFC) also ascertained through a proband with an OFC including three major racial/ethnic groups (European, Asian, and Latin American). Exposure rates to these environmental risk factors (maternal smoking, alcohol consumption, and multivitamin supplementation) varied across studies and among racial/ethnic groups, creating substantial differences in power to detect G × E interaction, but the trio design should minimize spurious results due to population stratification. The GENEVA and POFC studies were analyzed separately, and a meta-analysis was conducted across both studies to test for G × E interaction using the 2 df test of gene and G × E interaction and the 1 df test for G × E interaction alone. The 2 df test confirmed effects for several recognized risk genes, suggesting modest G × E effects. This analysis did reveal suggestive evidence for G × Vitamin interaction for on 1p36 located about 3 Mb from , a recognized risk gene. Several regions gave suggestive evidence of G × E interaction in the 1 df test. For example, for G × Smoking interaction, the 1 df test suggested markers in on 9q31.3 from meta-analysis. Markers near also showed suggestive evidence in the 1 df test for G × Alcohol interaction, and rs41117 near (a.k.a. ) also gave suggestive significance in the meta-analysis of the 1 df test for G × Vitamin interaction. While it remains quite difficult to obtain definitive evidence for G × E interaction in genome-wide studies, perhaps due to small effect sizes of individual genes combined with low exposure rates, this analysis of two large case-parent trio studies argues for considering possible G × E interaction in any comprehensive study of complex and heterogeneous disorders such as OFC.
两项针对病例-父母三联体的大型研究通过患有非综合征性口面部裂隙(OFC,包括唇腭裂、单纯唇裂或单纯腭裂)的先证者确定研究对象,用于检测全基因组标记(包括观察到的和推算出的)与自我报告的母亲孕期吸烟、饮酒及补充多种维生素之间可能存在的基因-环境(G×E)相互作用。这两项母研究如下:GENEVA研究,该研究纳入了1939个病例-父母三联体,主要通过欧洲、美国和亚洲的治疗中心招募;还有来自匹兹堡口面部裂隙研究(POFC)的1443个病例-父母三联体,该研究同样通过患有OFC的先证者确定研究对象,包括三个主要种族/族裔群体(欧洲人、亚洲人和拉丁美洲人)。这些环境风险因素(母亲吸烟、饮酒和补充多种维生素)的暴露率在不同研究以及不同种族/族裔群体中有所差异,这导致检测G×E相互作用的效能存在显著差异,但三联体设计应能最大程度减少因群体分层导致的虚假结果。GENEVA研究和POFC研究分别进行分析,并对两项研究进行荟萃分析,以使用基因和G×E相互作用的2自由度检验以及单独的G×E相互作用的1自由度检验来检测G×E相互作用。2自由度检验证实了几个公认风险基因的效应,提示存在适度的G×E效应。该分析确实揭示了位于距公认风险基因约3 Mb的1p36上的基因与维生素之间存在G×维生素相互作用的提示性证据。在1自由度检验中,几个区域给出了G×E相互作用的提示性证据。例如,对于G×吸烟相互作用,1自由度检验在荟萃分析中提示9q31.3上的标记。附近的标记在1自由度检验中也显示出G×酒精相互作用的提示性证据,(又名)附近的rs41117在1自由度检验的G×维生素相互作用的荟萃分析中也给出了提示性显著结果。虽然在全基因组研究中仍然很难获得G×E相互作用的确切证据,这可能是由于单个基因的效应大小较小以及暴露率较低,但对两项大型病例-父母三联体研究的分析表明,在任何对诸如OFC等复杂和异质性疾病的综合研究中都应考虑可能的G×E相互作用。