Suppr超能文献

使用方块临摹测验进行定量评估以评价阿尔茨海默病患者视觉空间功能的可能性。

Possibility of Using Quantitative Assessment with the Cube Copying Test for Evaluation of Visuo-spatial Function in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

作者信息

Mori Shino, Osawa Aiko, Maeshima Shinichiro, Sakurai Takashi, Ozaki Kenichi, Kondo Izumi, Saitoh Eiichi

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.

出版信息

Prog Rehabil Med. 2021 Apr 29;6:20210021. doi: 10.2490/prm.20210021. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of the Cube Copying Test (CCT) for quantitative assessment of visuo-spatial function in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

The CCT, Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM), and other neuropsychological tests were administered to 152 AD outpatients. For the quantitative assessment of CCT, we scored the points of connection (POC) and the number of plane-drawing errors (PDE) and categorized the pattern classification (PAC). We also measured Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) to assess the severity of AD. The relationships among CCT, RCPM, and FAST were then analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean POC and PDE scores were 2.7 and 3.6, respectively, and the median PAC score was 6.0. PDE and PAC showed a linear relationship, but POC and PDE, and POC and PAC did not. Each component of CCT showed a significant correlation with RCPM scores. PDE and PAC had closer correlations with RCPM scores than POC did. The PDE and PAC results were significantly different among most of the FAST stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative assessment using CCT may be effective for the quick determination of the visuo-spatial function in AD patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨方块复制测验(CCT)在定量评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者视觉空间功能方面的临床实用性。

方法

对152例AD门诊患者进行了CCT、瑞文彩色渐进矩阵测验(RCPM)及其他神经心理学测验。为对CCT进行定量评估,我们对方块连接点数(POC)、平面绘制错误数(PDE)进行评分,并对方块图案分类(PAC)进行归类。我们还测量了功能评估分期(FAST)以评估AD的严重程度。然后分析了CCT、RCPM和FAST之间的关系。

结果

POC和PDE的平均得分分别为2.7和3.6,PAC得分中位数为6.0。PDE和PAC呈线性关系,但POC与PDE、POC与PAC之间不存在线性关系。CCT的各个组成部分与RCPM得分均呈显著相关。PDE和PAC与RCPM得分的相关性比POC更紧密。在大多数FAST分期中,PDE和PAC的结果存在显著差异。

结论

使用CCT进行定量评估可能有助于快速测定AD患者的视觉空间功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/791a/8080165/203442807b91/prm-6-20210021-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验