Suppr超能文献

威姆斯综合征患者瑞文彩色推理测验的项目和错误分析。

Item and error analysis on Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices in Williams Syndrome.

机构信息

School of Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Town Hall, Hendon NW4 4BT, UK.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

Abstract

Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (RCPM) is a standardised test that is commonly used to obtain a non-verbal reasoning score for children. As the RCPM involves the matching of a target to a pattern it is also considered to be a visuo-spatial perception task. RCPM is therefore frequently used in studies in Williams Syndrome (WS), in order to match WS participants to a control group or as a single measure to predict performance on a test-condition in developmental trajectory analyses. However, little is known about the performance of participants with WS on the RCPM. The current study compared the type of errors and the difficulty of each item for 53 participants with WS to 53 typically developing children who were individually matched on the total raw score for RCPM. Results showed that the participants with WS made the same proportion of error types and that the proportion of error types changed similarly to those of typically developing controls over development. Furthermore, the differential item difficulty between the two groups was highly similar. It is therefore argued that, although participants with WS are delayed on RCPM, their performance is not atypical which suggests that RCPM performance is supported by typical mechanisms. The RCPM is therefore a useful tool to match WS to control groups or to construct developmental trajectories.

摘要

瑞文标准推理测验(Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices,RCPM)是一种常用的标准化测试,用于获取儿童的非言语推理分数。由于 RCPM 涉及目标与模式的匹配,因此也被认为是一种视空间感知任务。因此,RCPM 经常用于威廉姆斯综合征(Williams Syndrome,WS)的研究中,以便将 WS 参与者与对照组进行匹配,或者作为单一测量指标,预测发展轨迹分析中测试条件的表现。然而,关于 WS 参与者在 RCPM 上的表现,人们知之甚少。本研究比较了 53 名 WS 参与者和 53 名在 RCPM 总原始分数上进行个体匹配的典型发育儿童的错误类型和每个项目的难度。结果表明,WS 参与者犯的错误类型比例相同,而且随着发育的进行,错误类型的比例变化与典型发育对照组相似。此外,两组之间的差异项目难度高度相似。因此,可以认为,尽管 WS 参与者在 RCPM 上延迟,但他们的表现并非异常,这表明 RCPM 表现是由典型机制支持的。因此,RCPM 是一种有用的工具,可以将 WS 与对照组进行匹配,或构建发展轨迹。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验