• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体育教育中的风险与安全管理:教师实践视角研究

Risk and Safety Management in Physical Education: A Study of Teachers' Practice Perspectives.

作者信息

Porsanger Lise, Magnussen Leif Inge

机构信息

Department of Teacher Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Business, History and Social Sciences, University of Southeastern Norway, Borre, Norway.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Apr 16;3:663676. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.663676. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fspor.2021.663676
PMID:33937754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8085588/
Abstract

The aim of this article is to explore and understand teachers' risk and safety management (RSM) practices in physical education (PE) programs in Norway. A survey questionnaire and semistructured interviews were therefore used to generate quantitative data on trends from a larger sample of teachers ( = 698) and rich in-depth qualitative data concerning teachers' ( = 17) practices. By providing the teachers' perspectives, a better understanding of the complexity of RSM in PE may be possible. The results from both the survey and interviews suggest that teachers employ multiple strategies: from safety procedures, complying to compulsory risk measures, to the use of common sense in their RSM practices. The interviewees, on the other hand, initially claim that their RSM practice is quite scarce and, in some respects, not appropriate for PE. They emphasize measures that cater to the students' needs and modification to physical activities in their teaching. However, the interview data suggest that teachers do not primarily conceptualize this part of their practice as RSM but as measures of other pedagogical concerns. Combined, the results from both the survey and the interviews may characterize a RSM practice that relies on teaching experience and the use of discretion. The results in this article both converge and diverge and emphasize the importance of multiple data sources in investigating teachers' RSM practices.

摘要

本文旨在探究和了解挪威体育课程中教师的风险与安全管理(RSM)实践。因此,我们使用了一份调查问卷和半结构化访谈,以从大量教师样本(n = 698)中收集有关趋势的定量数据,并获取关于教师实践(n = 17)的丰富深入的定性数据。通过呈现教师的观点,或许能够更好地理解体育教育中RSM的复杂性。调查和访谈的结果均表明,教师采用多种策略:从安全程序、遵守强制性风险措施,到在其RSM实践中运用常识。另一方面,受访者最初声称他们的RSM实践相当匮乏,且在某些方面不适用于体育教育。他们强调在教学中要采取满足学生需求的措施以及对体育活动进行调整。然而,访谈数据表明,教师并非主要将其这部分实践概念化为RSM,而是视为其他教学关注点的措施。综合来看,调查和访谈的结果可能描绘出一种依赖教学经验和自由裁量权运用的RSM实践。本文的结果既有趋同之处,也有分歧之处,并强调了在调查教师RSM实践中多种数据来源的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a61/8085588/8c20f8924113/fspor-03-663676-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a61/8085588/8c20f8924113/fspor-03-663676-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a61/8085588/8c20f8924113/fspor-03-663676-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk and Safety Management in Physical Education: A Study of Teachers' Practice Perspectives.体育教育中的风险与安全管理:教师实践视角研究
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Apr 16;3:663676. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.663676. eCollection 2021.
2
Teacher emotion and pedagogical decision-making in ESP teaching in a Chinese University.中国一所大学中专门用途英语教学中的教师情感与教学决策
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:955474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955474. eCollection 2022.
3
Initial Outcomes of a Participatory-Based, Competency-Building Approach to Increasing Physical Education Teachers' Physical Activity Promotion and Students' Physical Activity: A Pilot Study.基于参与式的、能力建设方法对提高体育教师体育活动促进和学生体育活动的初步效果:一项试点研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Jun;45(3):359-370. doi: 10.1177/1090198117731600. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
4
Sustained Professional Development on Cooperative Learning: Impact on Six Teachers' Practices and Students' Learning.合作学习中的持续专业发展:对六位教师教学实践和学生学习的影响。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2017 Mar;88(1):83-94. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2016.1263381. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
5
Conceptualising GP teachers' knowledge: a pedagogical content knowledge perspective.理解全科医生教师的知识:一种学科教学知识视角。
Educ Prim Care. 2012 May;23(3):178-85. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494101.
6
Factors affecting success and failure in higher education mathematics: Students' and teachers' perspectives.影响高等教育数学学习成败的因素:学生与教师的观点
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 3;10(7):e29173. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29173. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
7
Exploring teachers' motivation to teach: A multisite study on the associations with the work climate, students' motivation, and teaching approaches.探索教师教学动机:一项关于工作氛围、学生动机和教学方法关联的多地点研究。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Apr;84(4):429-437. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12050. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
8
Students' and teachers' perceptions of effective ESP teaching.学生和教师对专门用途英语有效教学的看法。
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 16;8(9):e10628. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10628. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Students' experience of being seen by their physical education teachers and associated factors.学生被体育教师关注的经历及相关因素。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Apr 17;5:1101072. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1101072. eCollection 2023.
10
"You Only Teach PE and It Doesn't Really Matter": Middle School PE Teachers' Perspectives on Intervention Efforts to Increase Physical Activity.“你只教体育,这并不重要”:中学体育教师对增加体育活动干预措施的看法
J Sch Nurs. 2020 Apr;36(2):94-103. doi: 10.1177/1059840518795039. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
'In-between' and other reasonable ways to deal with risk and uncertainty: A review article.应对风险与不确定性的“中间地带”及其他合理方式:一篇综述文章
Health Risk Soc. 2016 Nov 16;18(7-8):348-366. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2016.1269879. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
2
Teaching Theory Construction With Initial Grounded Theory Tools: A Reflection on Lessons and Learning.运用初始扎根理论工具构建教学理论:对经验与学习的反思
Qual Health Res. 2015 Dec;25(12):1610-22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315613982.
3
What's wrong with risk matrices?风险矩阵有什么问题?
Risk Anal. 2008 Apr;28(2):497-512. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x.
4
The application of risk management in sport.风险管理在体育中的应用。
Sports Med. 2004;34(6):349-56. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434060-00001.