Zhao Hua, Li Danli, Zhong Yong
English Department and Research Institute of Foreign Languages, School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Department of Chinese Studies, School of Humanities and Languages, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:955474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955474. eCollection 2022.
Teacher emotion has become an important issue in English language teaching as it is a crucial construct in understanding teachers' responses to institutional policies. The study explored teachers' emotion labor and its impact on teachers' pedagogical decision-making in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) teaching in a university of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in China. Drawing on a poststructural perspective, the study examined data from two rounds of semi-structured interviews, policy documents and teaching artifacts. The analysis of data revealed that the major emotion labor facing the participants revolved around students' disengagement in class. Teachers experienced mixed feelings of anticipation, disappointment, anger, and empathy toward students and distanced themselves from institutional feeling rules enforcing objective assessment of students' performance and punishing students for lack of engagement in class. The study found that teacher emotion labor served as the site for their pedagogical modifications. ESP teachers' beliefs in the importance of attending to students' needs become a powerful discourse in supporting teachers to strategically subvert institutional feeling rules and critically reflect on the dysfunctions of curriculum, orienting teachers' agentic actions in modifying pedagogical practices. We thus underscore this empowering discourse as the bridge to connect teachers' policy negotiation and their actual classroom practices. We also highlight teachers' pedagogical decision-making as a process of the interactions of teacher emotion, teachers' reflexive practices, and power relations. The study ended by suggesting more longitudinal research where teachers' beliefs as previously appropriated discourses could be examined comprehensively as they were both the construct of emotion labor and the potential subverting power in supporting teachers' pedagogical decision-making in policy negotiation.
教师情感已成为英语教学中的一个重要问题,因为它是理解教师对制度政策反应的关键因素。本研究探讨了中国一所中医药大学专门用途英语(ESP)教学中教师的情感劳动及其对教师教学决策的影响。本研究借鉴后结构主义视角,分析了两轮半结构化访谈、政策文件和教学资料的数据。数据分析表明,参与者面临的主要情感劳动围绕着学生在课堂上的不参与。教师对学生有着期待、失望、愤怒和同理心等复杂情感,并与强制对学生表现进行客观评估以及惩罚课堂上不参与的学生的制度情感规则保持距离。研究发现,教师情感劳动是他们进行教学调整的场所。ESP教师认为关注学生需求很重要,这成为一种有力的话语,支持教师策略性地颠覆制度情感规则,并批判性地反思课程功能失调,引导教师采取能动行动来调整教学实践。因此,我们强调这种赋权话语是连接教师政策协商和实际课堂实践的桥梁。我们还强调教师的教学决策是教师情感、教师反思性实践和权力关系相互作用的过程。研究最后建议进行更多纵向研究,在这些研究中,可以全面考察教师信念(作为先前被挪用的话语),因为它们既是情感劳动的构成要素,也是支持教师在政策协商中进行教学决策的潜在颠覆力量。