Advanced Education Program in Prosthodontics, Department of Prosthodontics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN.
Prosthodontics Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):165-170. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13377. Epub 2021 May 12.
To evaluate the color stability of 3D-printed interim restorations with different surface treatments while immersed in various staining solutions or beverages (artificial saliva, tea, coffee, and wine) for 6 months.
An acrylic tooth was prepared for an all-ceramic full-coverage restoration. A laboratory scanner was used to digitize the prepared abutment tooth. A virtual all-ceramic full-coverage restoration was designed on the digitized abutment tooth using a laboratory CAD/CAM software. Eighty abutment teeth and interim restorations were 3D-printed with tooth-colored photopolymerizing resin. The restorations were randomly allocated into two different groups: Polish and Optiglaze. For the Polish group, interim restorations were finished and polished with aluminum oxide finishers/polishers. For the Optiglaze group, one layer of nanofilled, light-polymerizing protective coating was then applied. The 80 printed interim crowns were divided into 4 different groups depending on where they would be immersed: Artificial saliva, coffee, wine, and tea. After the sample allocations, there were 8 experimental groups. Each group was allocated with 10 specimens. Color measurements were obtained using a digital spectrophotometer in conjunction with The CIE Lab* system before the immersion and 6 months after the immersion. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the effects of surface treatment, immersion liquid, and their interaction on ΔE at 6-month post-immersion. Fisher's protected least significant differences (LSD) was used as post hoc test to compare groups differences (α = .05).
There were significant effects of surface treatment [F(1,72) = 13.39, p = 0.000], immersion liquid [F(3,72) = 74.18, p = 0.000], and their interaction [F(3,72) = 16.33, p = 0.000] on ΔE at 6-month post-immersion at the α = .05 level. The polish group showed significantly higher ΔE than the Optiglaze group when immersed in coffee (p < 0.001) and wine (p = 0.015). The Optiglaze group showed significantly higher ΔE than the polish group that was immersed in artificial saliva (p < 0.001). The wine group showed higher ΔE than all other immersion liquid groups for both polish and Optiglaze surface treatments (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). ΔL* showed a reduction that was significantly higher than the 2.0 acceptability threshold in the wine-polish (p < 0.001) and wine-Optiglaze (p < 0.001) groups. ΔE showed a color change that was significantly higher than the perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for all the groups under polish surface treatment (p < 0.001). ΔE also showed a color change that was significantly higher than the perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for artificial saliva, tea, and wine under Optiglaze surface treatment (p = 0.004).
3D-printed interim restorations showed significant discoloration after 6-months immersions in the artificial saliva and common beverages (including tea, coffee, and wine). Among all the chromogenic beverages, red wine caused the most significant discoloration on the interim restorations. When 3D-printed interim restorations are needed for extended intraoral service, nano-filled, light polymerizing protective coating can reduce the restoration discoloration caused by chromogenic beverages. The protective effect is most significant against coffee.
评估不同表面处理的 3D 打印临时修复体在浸入各种染色溶液或饮料(人工唾液、茶、咖啡和酒) 6 个月后的颜色稳定性。
制备全瓷覆盖修复体的丙烯酸牙齿。使用实验室扫描仪对准备好的基牙进行数字化。使用实验室 CAD/CAM 软件在数字化基牙上设计虚拟全瓷覆盖修复体。用牙色光聚合树脂 3D 打印 80 个基牙和临时修复体。修复体随机分为两组:抛光和 Optiglaze。对于抛光组,临时修复体用氧化铝研磨剂/抛光剂进行修整和抛光。对于 Optiglaze 组,涂覆一层纳米填充、光聚合保护涂层。80 个打印临时冠根据浸泡位置分为 4 个不同组:人工唾液、咖啡、酒和茶。样本分配后,有 8 个实验组。每组分配 10 个样本。在浸泡前和浸泡 6 个月后使用数字分光光度计与 CIE Lab*系统联合获取颜色测量值。采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)检验表面处理、浸泡液及其相互作用对浸泡 6 个月后ΔE 的影响。采用 Fisher 保护最小显著差异(LSD)检验进行事后检验,以比较组间差异(α=0.05)。
在浸泡 6 个月后,表面处理(F(1,72)=13.39,p=0.000)、浸泡液(F(3,72)=74.18,p=0.000)及其相互作用(F(3,72)=16.33,p=0.000)对ΔE 有显著影响,在α=0.05 水平。与 Optiglaze 组相比,抛光组在咖啡(p<0.001)和酒(p=0.015)中浸泡时的ΔE 显著更高。与抛光组相比,Optiglaze 组在人工唾液中浸泡时的ΔE 显著更高(p<0.001)。对于抛光和 Optiglaze 表面处理,酒组的ΔE 均高于所有其他浸泡液组(所有比较均为 p<0.001)。ΔL* 显示出比 2.0 可接受阈值明显更大的降低,在酒-抛光(p<0.001)和酒-Optiglaze(p<0.001)组中。对于抛光表面处理的所有组,ΔE 显示出比可感知和可接受阈值明显更高的颜色变化(p<0.001)。ΔE 也显示出比可感知和可接受阈值明显更高的颜色变化,对于 Optiglaze 表面处理的人工唾液、茶和酒(p=0.004)。
3D 打印临时修复体在人工唾液和常见饮料(包括茶、咖啡和酒)中浸泡 6 个月后出现明显变色。在所有显色饮料中,红酒对临时修复体造成的变色最明显。当需要 3D 打印临时修复体进行延长的口腔内服务时,纳米填充、光聚合保护涂层可以减少显色饮料引起的修复体变色。对咖啡的保护效果最显著。