• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蚂蚁的非理性风险规避

Irrational risk aversion in an ant.

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Animal Comparative Economics Laboratory, Department of Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1237-1245. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01516-1. Epub 2021 May 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-021-01516-1
PMID:33939043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8492575/
Abstract

Animals must often decide between exploiting safe options or risky options with a chance for large gains. Both proximate theories based on perceptual mechanisms, and evolutionary ones based on fitness benefits, have been proposed to explain decisions under risk. Eusocial insects represent a special case of risk sensitivity, as they must often make collective decisions based on resource evaluations from many individuals. Previously, colonies of the ant Lasius niger were found to be risk-neutral, but the risk preference of individual foragers was unknown. Here, we tested individual L. niger in a risk sensitivity paradigm. Ants were trained to associate one scent with 0.55 M sucrose solution and another with an equal chance of either 0.1 or 1.0 M sucrose. Preference was tested in a Y-maze. Ants were extremely risk-averse, with 91% choosing the safe option. Based on the psychophysical Weber-Fechner law, we predicted that ants evaluate resources depending on their logarithmic difference. To test this hypothesis, we designed 4 more experiments by varying the relative differences between the alternatives, making the risky option less, equally or more valuable than the safe one. Our results support the logarithmic origin of risk aversion in ants, and demonstrate that the behaviour of individual foragers can be a very poor predictor of colony-level behaviour.

摘要

动物在面临安全选项和风险选项(有获得大收益的机会)时,往往需要做出抉择。为了解释风险下的决策,人们提出了基于感知机制的近期理论和基于适应度收益的进化理论。群居昆虫对风险的敏感性是一个特殊情况,因为它们必须经常根据许多个体对资源的评估做出集体决策。先前的研究发现,黑蚁(Lasius niger)的蚁群是风险中立的,但单个觅食者的风险偏好尚不清楚。在这里,我们在风险敏感性范式中测试了单个黑蚁。蚂蚁被训练将一种气味与 0.55 M 蔗糖溶液相关联,另一种气味与 0.1 或 1.0 M 蔗糖的机会相等。在 Y 型迷宫中测试偏好。蚂蚁非常厌恶风险,有 91%的蚂蚁选择安全选项。根据心理物理学韦伯-费希纳定律,我们预测蚂蚁会根据资源的对数差异来评估资源。为了验证这一假设,我们设计了另外 4 个实验,通过改变选项之间的相对差异,使风险选项的价值小于、等于或大于安全选项。我们的结果支持了蚂蚁回避风险的对数起源,并表明单个觅食者的行为可能是蚁群行为的一个很差的预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d4/8492575/06576be4899f/10071_2021_1516_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d4/8492575/527d9565ca18/10071_2021_1516_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d4/8492575/06576be4899f/10071_2021_1516_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d4/8492575/527d9565ca18/10071_2021_1516_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d4/8492575/06576be4899f/10071_2021_1516_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Irrational risk aversion in an ant.蚂蚁的非理性风险规避
Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1237-1245. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01516-1. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Ants prefer the option they are trained to first.蚂蚁更喜欢它们最初接受训练的选项。
J Exp Biol. 2022 Dec 15;225(24). doi: 10.1242/jeb.243984. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
3
Ant Lasius niger joining one-way trails go against the flow.黑褐林蚁加入单向轨迹时会逆行。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 11;12(1):2361. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05879-4.
4
Bundling and segregation affect pheromone deposition, but not choice, in an ant.捆绑和隔离会影响蚂蚁信息素的沉积,但不会影响其选择。
Elife. 2022 Nov 22;11:e79314. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79314.
5
The Effect of Trail Pheromone and Path Confinement on Learning of Complex Routes in the Ant Lasius niger.踪迹信息素和路径限制对黑蚁学习复杂路线的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 9;11(3):e0149720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149720. eCollection 2016.
6
Rational time investment during collective decision making in ants.蚂蚁的集体决策中的理性时间投入。
Biol Lett. 2019 Oct 31;15(10):20190542. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0542. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
7
Same length, different shapes: ants collectively choose a straight foraging path over a bent one.同样长度,不同形状:蚂蚁集体选择直的觅食路径而不是弯的。
Biol Lett. 2018 Mar;14(3). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0070.
8
Rationality in collective decision-making by ant colonies.蚁群集体决策中的合理性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 22;276(1673):3655-61. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0981. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
9
Triggering and persistence of trail-laying in foragers of the ant Lasius niger.黑蚁觅食者中踪迹标记的触发与持续存在
J Insect Physiol. 2005 Mar;51(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.12.001.
10
Modeling shortest path selection of the ant Linepithema humile using psychophysical theory and realistic parameter values.运用心理物理学理论和实际参数值对阿根廷蚁Linepithema humile的最短路径选择进行建模。
J Theor Biol. 2015 May 7;372:168-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.02.030. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Bundling and segregation affect pheromone deposition, but not choice, in an ant.捆绑和隔离会影响蚂蚁信息素的沉积,但不会影响其选择。
Elife. 2022 Nov 22;11:e79314. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79314.

本文引用的文献

1
Viscosity as a key factor in decision making of nectar feeding ants.黏度是决定蜜食性蚂蚁觅食行为的关键因素。
J Insect Physiol. 2021 Jan;128:104164. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104164. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
Rational time investment during collective decision making in ants.蚂蚁的集体决策中的理性时间投入。
Biol Lett. 2019 Oct 31;15(10):20190542. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0542. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
3
Ants learn fast and do not forget: associative olfactory learning, memory and extinction in .蚂蚁学习迅速且不会遗忘:[具体物种]中的联想嗅觉学习、记忆与消退
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jun 19;6(6):190778. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190778. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Positive and negative incentive contrasts lead to relative value perception in ants.正、负激励对比导致蚂蚁产生相对价值感知。
Elife. 2019 Jul 2;8:e45450. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45450.
5
The Ecology of Collective Behavior in Ants.蚂蚁的集体行为生态学
Annu Rev Entomol. 2019 Jan 7;64:35-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111923. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
6
Voluntary switching in an invertebrate: The effect of cue and reward change.无脊椎动物中的自愿转换:线索和奖励变化的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(3):247-257. doi: 10.1037/xan0000171.
7
Greater effort increases perceived value in an invertebrate.更大的努力会增加一种无脊椎动物的感知价值。
J Comp Psychol. 2018 May;132(2):200-209. doi: 10.1037/com0000109. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
8
The Psychology of Superorganisms: Collective Decision Making by Insect Societies.超个体心理学:昆虫社会的集体决策。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2018 Jan 7;63:259-275. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043249. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
9
Superorganismality and caste differentiation as points of no return: how the major evolutionary transitions were lost in translation.超个体性和社会分工作为不可逆转的转折点:主要进化转变是如何在翻译中丢失的。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Feb;93(1):28-54. doi: 10.1111/brv.12330. Epub 2017 May 15.
10
Sampling and tracking a changing environment: persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees.对不断变化的环境进行采样和追踪:大黄蜂觅食决策中的持久性与奖励机制
Interface Focus. 2017 Jun 6;7(3):20160149. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0149. Epub 2017 Apr 21.