Daniel Black + Associates | db+a, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
UWE Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Urban Health. 2021 Jun;98(3):415-427. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00537-y. Epub 2021 May 3.
This paper sets out the main findings from two rounds of interviews with senior representatives from the UK's urban development industry: the third and final phase of a 3-year pilot, Moving Health Upstream in Urban Development' (UPSTREAM). The project had two primary aims: firstly, to attempt to value economically the health cost-benefits associated with the quality of urban environments and, secondly, to interview those in control of urban development in the UK in order to reveal the potential barriers to, and opportunities for, the creation of healthy urban environments, including their views on the use of economic valuation of (planetary) health outcomes. Much is known about the 'downstream' impact of urban environments on human and planetary health and about how to design and plan healthy towns and cities ('midstream'), but we understand relatively little about how health can be factored in at key governance tipping points further 'upstream', particularly within dominant private sector areas of control (e.g. land, finance, delivery) at sub-national level. Our findings suggest that both public and private sector appeared well aware of the major health challenges posed by poor-quality urban environments. Yet they also recognized that health is not factored adequately into the urban planning process, and there was considerable support for greater use of non-market economic valuation to help improve decision-making. There was no silver bullet however: 110 barriers and 76 opportunities were identified across a highly complex range of systems, actors and processes, including many possible points of targeted intervention for economic valuation. Eight main themes were identified as key areas for discussion and future focus. This findings paper is the second of two on this phase of the project: the first sets out the rationale, approach and methodological lessons learned.
这是为期三年试点项目“将健康问题纳入城市发展的前期考虑”(UPSTREAM)的第三轮也是最后一轮。该项目有两个主要目标:首先,尝试对与城市环境质量相关的健康成本效益进行经济评估;其次,对英国城市发展的控制者进行访谈,以揭示创建健康城市环境的潜在障碍和机遇,包括他们对健康结果(地球)经济评估的看法。我们对城市环境对人类和地球健康的“下游”影响以及如何设计和规划健康城镇和城市(“中游”)有了很多了解,但我们相对较少了解健康如何在关键治理转折点“上游”发挥作用,特别是在地方层面上的私营部门控制的主要领域(如土地、金融、交付)。我们的研究结果表明,公共和私营部门都非常清楚由低质量城市环境带来的主要健康挑战。然而,他们也认识到健康并未充分纳入城市规划过程,并且非常支持更多地使用非市场经济评估来帮助改善决策。然而,这并没有一劳永逸的解决办法:在高度复杂的系统、行为者和流程中,确定了 110 个障碍和 76 个机遇,包括经济评估的许多可能的目标干预点。确定了八个主要主题作为讨论和未来关注的重点领域。本研究结果论文是该项目这一阶段的第二篇:第一篇阐述了项目的基本原理、方法和方法学经验教训。