Structural and Computational Biology Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(28):7677-7702. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1916735. Epub 2021 May 3.
The group, also known as (), is a species complex that contains numerous closely related lineages, which vary in their ability to cause illness in humans and animals. The classification of isolates into species-level taxonomic units is thus essential for informing public health and food safety efforts. However, taxonomic classification of these organisms is challenging. Numerous-often conflicting-taxonomic changes to the group have been proposed over the past two decades, making it difficult to remain up to date. In this review, we discuss the major nomenclatural changes that have accumulated in the taxonomic space prior to 2020, particularly in the genomic sequencing era, and outline the resulting problems. We discuss several contemporary taxonomic frameworks as applied to , including (i) phenotypic, (ii) genomic, and (iii) hybrid nomenclatural frameworks, and we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each. We offer suggestions as to how readers can avoid taxonomic ambiguities, regardless of the nomenclatural framework(s) they choose to employ. Finally, we discuss future directions and open problems in the taxonomic realm, including those that cannot be solved by genomic approaches alone.
该小组也被称为(),是一个包含许多密切相关谱系的物种复合体,这些谱系在引起人类和动物疾病的能力上有所不同。因此,将分离物分类为种级别的分类单元对于告知公共卫生和食品安全工作至关重要。然而,这些生物体的分类学分类具有挑战性。在过去的二十年中,已经提出了许多(通常是相互矛盾的)对该群体的分类学变化,这使得及时了解最新情况变得困难。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了 2020 年之前在()分类学空间中积累的主要命名变更,特别是在基因组测序时代,并概述了由此产生的问题。我们讨论了适用于()的几种当代分类学框架,包括(i)表型,(ii)基因组和(iii)杂种命名框架,并讨论了每种框架的优缺点。我们提供了一些建议,无论读者选择使用哪种命名框架(或框架),如何避免()分类学上的歧义。最后,我们讨论了()分类领域的未来方向和未解决的问题,包括仅通过基因组方法无法解决的问题。