Suppr超能文献

无需组装:使用BTyper3评估提议的分类框架与历史分型方法对该组的一致性。

No Assembly Required: Using BTyper3 to Assess the Congruency of a Proposed Taxonomic Framework for the Group With Historical Typing Methods.

作者信息

Carroll Laura M, Cheng Rachel A, Kovac Jasna

机构信息

Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2020 Sep 22;11:580691. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.580691. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The group, also known as (), is a species complex comprising numerous closely related lineages, which vary in their ability to cause illness in humans and animals. The classification of isolates into species-level taxonomic units is essential for facilitating communication between and among microbiologists, clinicians, public health officials, and industry professionals, but is not always straightforward. A recently proposed genomospecies-subspecies-biovar taxonomic framework aims to provide a standardized nomenclature for this species complex but relies heavily on whole-genome sequencing (WGS). It thus is unclear whether popular, low-cost typing methods (e.g., single- and multi-locus sequence typing) remain congruent with the proposed taxonomy. Here, we characterize 2,231 genomes using a combination of (i) average-nucleotide identity (ANI)-based genomospecies assignment, (ii) ANI-based subspecies assignment, (iii) seven-gene multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), (iv) single-locus group assignment, (v) allelic typing, and (vi) virulence factor detection. We show that sequence types (STs) assigned using MLST can be used for genomospecies assignment, and we provide a comprehensive list of ST/genomospecies associations. For group assignment, we show that an adjusted, eight-group framework is largely, albeit not perfectly, congruent with the proposed eight-genomospecies taxonomy, as alone may not distinguish (i) from Group II and (ii) from Group VI . We additionally provide a list of loci that capture the topology of the whole-genome phylogeny that may be used in future sequence typing efforts. For researchers with access to WGS, MLST, and/or data, we showcase how our recently released software, BTyper3 (https://github.com/lmc297/BTyper3), can be used to assign isolates to taxonomic units within this proposed framework with little-to-no user intervention or domain-specific knowledge of taxonomy. We additionally outline a novel method for assigning genomes to pseudo-gene flow units within proposed genomospecies. The results presented here highlight the backward-compatibility and accessibility of the recently proposed genomospecies-subspecies-biovar taxonomic framework and illustrate that WGS is not a necessity for microbiologists who want to use the proposed nomenclature effectively.

摘要

该菌群,也被称为(),是一个物种复合体,由众多密切相关的谱系组成,它们在导致人类和动物疾病的能力方面存在差异。将分离株分类到物种水平的分类单元对于促进微生物学家、临床医生、公共卫生官员和行业专业人员之间的交流至关重要,但并非总是直截了当的。最近提出的基因组种 - 亚种 - 生物变种分类框架旨在为这个物种复合体提供标准化的命名法,但严重依赖全基因组测序(WGS)。因此,尚不清楚流行的低成本分型方法(例如单基因座和多基因座序列分型)是否与提议的分类法保持一致。在这里,我们使用以下方法的组合对2231个基因组进行了特征分析:(i)基于平均核苷酸同一性(ANI)的基因组种分配,(ii)基于ANI的亚种分配,(iii)七基因多基因座序列分型(MLST),(iv)单基因座群分配,(v)等位基因分型,以及(vi)毒力因子检测。我们表明,使用MLST分配的序列类型(STs)可用于基因组种分配,并且我们提供了ST/基因组种关联的综合列表。对于群分配,我们表明,一个经过调整的八群框架在很大程度上(尽管并非完美)与提议的八个基因组种分类法一致,因为单独使用可能无法区分(i)来自第二群的和(ii)来自第六群的。我们还提供了一组位点列表,这些位点捕捉了全基因组系统发育的拓扑结构,可用于未来的序列分型工作。对于能够获取WGS、MLST和/或数据的研究人员,我们展示了如何使用我们最近发布的软件BTyper3(https://github.com/lmc297/BTyper3),在几乎没有用户干预或对分类法的特定领域知识的情况下,将菌株分配到这个提议框架内的分类单元。我们还概述了一种将基因组分配到提议的基因组种内的假基因流单元的新方法。这里呈现的结果突出了最近提出的基因组种 - 亚种 - 生物变种分类框架的向后兼容性和可及性,并表明对于希望有效使用提议命名法的微生物学家来说,WGS并非必需。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822c/7536271/ff18bc9f7dfa/fmicb-11-580691-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验