• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时检测鼻咽拭子、全口液和呼吸道飞沫中 SARS-CoV2 拷贝数的意义。

Implications in the quantification of SARS-CoV2 copies in concurrent nasopharyngeal swabs, whole mouth fluid and respiratory droplets.

机构信息

VHS Laboratory Services, Department of Clinical Research, VHS Hospital, Chennai, India.

Chennai Dental Research Foundation, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Virus Res. 2021 Oct 2;303:198442. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198442. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198442
PMID:33940004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8086371/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Association of SARS-CoV2 burden in the aerodigestive tract with the disease is sparsely understood. We propose to elucidate the implications of SARS-CoV2 copies in concurrent nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), whole mouth fluid (WMF) and respiratory droplet (RD) samples on disease pathogenesis/transmission.

METHODS

SARS-CoV2 copies quantified by RT-PCR in concurrent NPS, WMF and RD samples from 80 suspected COVID-19 patients were analysed with demographics, immune response and disease severity.

RESULTS

Among the 55/80 (69 %) NPS-positive patients, SARS-CoV2 was detected in 44/55 (80 %) WMF (concordance with NPS-84 %; p = 0.02) and 17/55 (31 %) RD samples. SARS-CoV2 copies were similar in NPS (median:8.74 × 10^5) and WMF (median:3.07 × 10^4), but lower in RD (median:3.60 × 10^2). The 25-75 % interquartile range of SARS-CoV2 copies in the NPS was significantly higher in patients who shed the virus in WMF (p = 0.0001) and RD (p = 0.01). Multivariate analyses showed that hospitalized patients shed significantly higher virus copies in the WMF (p = 0.01). Hospitalized patients with more severe disease (p = 0.03) and higher IL-6 values (p = 0.001) shed more SARS-CoV2 virus in the RD.

CONCLUSIONS

WMF may be used reliably as a surrogate for diagnosis. High copy numbers in the NPS probably imply early disease onset, while in the WMF and RD may imply more severe disease and increased inflammation.

摘要

目的

人们对 SARS-CoV2 在呼吸道中的负担与疾病的关联知之甚少。我们拟阐明鼻咽拭子(NPS)、全口液(WMF)和呼吸飞沫(RD)样本中同时存在的 SARS-CoV2 拷贝数对疾病发病机制/传播的影响。

方法

对 80 例疑似 COVID-19 患者的 NPS、WMF 和 RD 样本进行同步 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV2 拷贝数,并结合患者的人口统计学、免疫反应和疾病严重程度进行分析。

结果

在 55/80(69%)NPS 阳性患者中,在 44/55(80%)WMF(与 NPS 一致为 84%;p=0.02)和 17/55(31%)RD 样本中检测到 SARS-CoV2。NPS(中位数:8.74×10^5)和 WMF(中位数:3.07×10^4)中的 SARS-CoV2 拷贝数相似,但 RD(中位数:3.60×10^2)中的拷贝数较低。NPS 中 SARS-CoV2 拷贝数的 25-75%四分位间距在 WM 中排出病毒的患者中显著更高(p=0.0001)和 RD(p=0.01)。多变量分析显示,住院患者在 WMF 中排出的病毒载量显著更高(p=0.01)。疾病更严重(p=0.03)和更高的 IL-6 值(p=0.001)的住院患者在 RD 中排出更多的 SARS-CoV2 病毒。

结论

WMF 可作为可靠的诊断替代物。NPS 中的高拷贝数可能暗示疾病早期发作,而在 WMF 和 RD 中可能暗示更严重的疾病和炎症增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfef/8086371/1d7019318f24/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfef/8086371/f14f9eb36d4e/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfef/8086371/508884ebbc4c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfef/8086371/1d7019318f24/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfef/8086371/f14f9eb36d4e/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfef/8086371/508884ebbc4c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfef/8086371/1d7019318f24/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Implications in the quantification of SARS-CoV2 copies in concurrent nasopharyngeal swabs, whole mouth fluid and respiratory droplets.同时检测鼻咽拭子、全口液和呼吸道飞沫中 SARS-CoV2 拷贝数的意义。
Virus Res. 2021 Oct 2;303:198442. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198442. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
2
Sensitivity and Specificity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Tests Using Oral, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.使用口腔、前鼻和鼻咽拭子的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测试验的敏感性和特异性:一项诊断准确性研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0202921. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02029-21. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients.唾液优于鼻咽拭子用于检测 COVID-19 患者的 SARS-CoV2。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 22;11(1):22640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02097-2.
4
Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Detection With Nasopharyngeal Swabs.鼻咽拭子检测 SARS-CoV-2 的敏感性。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;8:593491. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.593491. eCollection 2020.
5
SARS-CoV-2 on Ocular Surfaces in a Cohort of Patients With COVID-19 From the Lombardy Region, Italy.意大利伦巴第地区 COVID-19 患者队列中眼表面的 SARS-CoV-2。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 1;139(9):956-963. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.5464.
6
A combined oro-nasopharyngeal swab is more sensitive than mouthwash in detecting SARS-CoV-2 by a high-throughput PCR assay.经高通量 PCR 检测,与漱口相比,联合口咽拭子更敏感。
Infection. 2021 Jun;49(3):527-531. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01600-1. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Saliva is Comparable to Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.唾液样本与鼻咽拭子在 SARS-CoV-2 的分子检测中具有可比性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0016221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00162-21. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
8
SARS-CoV-2 Variants May Affect Saliva RT-PCR Assay Sensitivity.SARS-CoV-2 变异株可能影响唾液 RT-PCR 检测的敏感性。
J Appl Lab Med. 2024 Nov 4;9(6):927-937. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae095.
9
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
10
SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs is not an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome.鼻咽拭子中的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量不是不良结局的独立预测因子。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 21;11(1):12931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92400-y.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.

本文引用的文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Gingival Crevicular Fluid.龈沟液中 SARS-CoV-2 的检测。
J Dent Res. 2021 Feb;100(2):187-193. doi: 10.1177/0022034520970536. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
2
Use of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) in the diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19).呼出气冷凝液(EBC)在 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)诊断中的应用。
Thorax. 2021 Jan;76(1):86-88. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215705. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
3
SARS-CoV-2 Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing-False-Negative Results From a Pervasive Anatomical Misconception.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型鼻咽拭子检测——普遍存在的解剖学误解导致的假阴性结果
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Nov 1;146(11):993-994. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.2946.
4
Nasopharyngeal Swabs Are More Sensitive Than Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis and Monitoring the SARS-CoV-2 Load.对于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的诊断和监测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)载量,鼻咽拭子比口咽拭子更敏感。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 18;7:334. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00334. eCollection 2020.
5
Suppression of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the Italian municipality of Vo'.Vo' 镇暴发的 SARS-CoV-2 疫情得到控制。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):425-429. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2488-1. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
6
Evaluating the use of posterior oropharyngeal saliva in a point-of-care assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.评估即时检测中使用后口咽唾液用于 SARS-CoV-2 的检测。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1356-1359. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1775133.
7
Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection and viral load analysis in patients with different clinical presentations.甲型 H1N1pdm09 感染及不同临床表现患者的病毒载量分析。
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2020;115:e200009. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760200009. Epub 2020 May 18.
8
Saliva as a Noninvasive Specimen for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.唾液作为检测新型冠状病毒2的非侵入性样本。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00776-20.
9
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.住院 COVID-19 患者的病毒学评估。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
10
Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study.SARS-CoV-2 感染后口咽后唾液样本和血清抗体反应中的病毒载量时间特征:一项观察性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):565-574. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1. Epub 2020 Mar 23.