Suppr超能文献

比较两种特定于 COVID-19 的风险预测模型:布雷西亚-COVID 呼吸严重程度量表与快速 COVID-19 严重程度指数。

Comparison of 2 Risk Prediction Models Specific for COVID-19: The Brescia-COVID Respiratory Severity Scale Versus the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index.

机构信息

Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Şehir Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.

İstanbul Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Aug;15(4):e46-e50. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.141. Epub 2020 May 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the prognostic performances of the Brescia-COVID Respiratory Severity Scale (BCRSS) and the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI) scores in hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

METHODS

The data of all adult patients (over 18 y of age) who were admitted into a state hospital with confirmed COVID-19 between May 1, 2020, and October 31, 2020, were retrospectively examined. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, known as the area under the curve (AUC), was used to assess the BCRSS prediction rule and the qCSI score to assess the discriminatory power in predicting in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

RESULTS

There were 341 patients included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 58.2 ± 17.2, of which 165 were men and 176 were women, and 61.3% of patients had at least 1 comorbidity. The most common comorbidity was hypertension. The predictive power scores of BCRSS and qCSI were found as very good in terms of in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.804 and 0.847, respectively) and likewise in terms of ICU admission (AUC 0.842 and 0.851, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both BCRSS and qCSI scoring systems were found to be successful in predicting in-hospital mortality and ICU admission in our patient population.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了 Brescia-COVID 呼吸严重程度评分(BCRSS)和快速 COVID-19 严重程度指数(qCSI)评分在确诊 COVID-19 的住院患者中的预后表现。

方法

回顾性分析了 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日期间入住一家州立医院的所有成年(18 岁以上)确诊 COVID-19 患者的数据。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估 BCRSS 预测规则和 qCSI 评分在预测住院死亡率和重症监护病房(ICU)入住方面的判别能力。

结果

本研究共纳入 341 例患者。患者的平均年龄为 58.2±17.2 岁,其中 165 例为男性,176 例为女性,61.3%的患者至少合并 1 种合并症。最常见的合并症是高血压。BCRSS 和 qCSI 的预测效能评分在预测住院死亡率方面表现为非常好(AUC 分别为 0.804 和 0.847),在预测 ICU 入住方面也表现为非常好(AUC 分别为 0.842 和 0.851)。

结论

BCRSS 和 qCSI 评分系统在预测我们患者人群的住院死亡率和 ICU 入住方面均取得成功。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验