Department of Radiation Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia.
Med Dosim. 2021;46(2):e1-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether dose to the skin surface underneath bolus, was accurately predicted by a 3D treatment planning system (TPS) in patients receiving 50 Gy/25# postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) using optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry (OSLD) for verification. In vivo dosimetry using OSLDs was performed in 20 consecutive patients receiving PMRT. An array of 9 OSLDs were applied to the chest wall or neobreast in a grid arrangement. Dosimetry data were recorded on 3 separate treatment fractions, averaged, and extrapolated to 25 fractions. On the 3D TPS, the predicted dose was calculated using the departmental planning algorithm at points corresponding to the OSLDs. The mean within patient difference between the planned and measured dose at each of the 9 points was calculated and Bland-Altman limits of agreement used to quantify the extent of agreement. Paired t-tests were used to test for evidence of systematic bias at each point. The coefficient of variation of the 3 OSLD readings per patient at each of the 9 points was low for 8 points (≤4.4%) demonstrating comparable dose received per fraction at these points. The mean ratio between the in vivo measured extrapolated OSLD (IVME OSLD) dose and the planned TPS dose ranged between 0.97 and 0.99 across all points (standard deviation range 0.05 to 0.08). The mean within patient difference between the IVME OSLD and planned TPS was <1 Gy at 7 of the 9 points and the t-test for evidence of systematic bias was significant (p = 0.03) at only 1 of the 9 points. Our commercially available 3D TPS closely predicted PMRT skin surface dose underneath bolus as verified by OSLDs. At all sites, the average ratio of delivered to predicted dose was >0.97 but <1. This practical and feasible OSLD assessment of only 3 of 25 fractions facilitates quality assurance of a TPS in predicting skin surface dose under bolus.
这项研究的目的是评估在接受 50Gy/25# 乳房切除术后放疗 (PMRT) 的患者中,使用光激励发光剂量测定法 (OSLD) 进行验证时,3D 治疗计划系统 (TPS) 是否能准确预测皮下表面的剂量。对 20 例接受 PMRT 的连续患者进行了 OSLD 体内剂量测定。将 9 个 OSLD 阵列以网格方式应用于胸壁或新乳房。在 3 个不同的治疗部分记录剂量数据,进行平均,并外推至 25 个部分。在 3D TPS 上,使用部门规划算法在与 OSLD 相对应的点处计算预测剂量。计算每个 9 个点处计划剂量与测量剂量之间的患者内平均差异,并使用 Bland-Altman 协议界限来量化一致性程度。使用配对 t 检验测试每个点是否存在系统偏差的证据。8 个点(≤4.4%)每个患者的 3 个 OSLD 读数的变异系数较低(≤4.4%),表明这些点的每个部分的剂量相似。在所有点上,体内测量外推 OSLD(IVME OSLD)剂量与计划 TPS 剂量之间的平均比值介于 0.97 到 0.99 之间(标准差范围为 0.05 到 0.08)。IVME OSLD 与计划 TPS 之间的患者内平均差异在 9 个点中的 7 个点小于 1Gy,并且证据表明系统偏差的 t 检验具有统计学意义(p=0.03),仅在 9 个点中的 1 个点。我们的商业上可用的 3D TPS 紧密预测了 OSLD 验证下的皮下表面剂量。在所有部位,实际剂量与预测剂量的比值均大于 0.97,但小于 1。这种仅对 25 个部分中的 3 个部分进行的 OSLD 评估,便于在预测皮下表面剂量时对 TPS 进行质量保证。