Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
FRCS (General Surgery), FEBS (HPB Surgery), Hepato-Pancreatico-BiliarySurgery, Department of Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;15(8):865-877. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1924058. Epub 2021 May 13.
: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal disease with a wide spectrum of severity and morbidity. Developed in 1974, the Ranson score was the first scoring system to prognosticate AP. Over the past decades, while the Ranson score remains widely used, it was identified to have certain limitations, such as having low predictive power. It has also been criticized for its 48-hour requirement for computation of the final score, which has been argued to potentially delay management. With advancements in our understanding of AP, is the Ranson score still relevant as an effective prognostication system for AP?: This review summarizes the available evidence comparing Ranson score with other conventional and novel scoring systems, in terms of prognostic accuracy, benefits, limitations and clinical applicability. It also evaluates the effectiveness of Ranson score with regard to the Revised Atlanta Classification.: The Ranson score consistently exhibits comparable prognostic accuracy to other newer scoring systems, and the 48-hour timeframe for computing the full Ranson score is an inherent strength, not a weakness. These aspects, coupled with relative ease of use, practicality and universality of the score, advocate for the continued relevance of the Ranson score in modern clinical practice.
急性胰腺炎(AP)是一种常见的胃肠道疾病,其严重程度和发病率差异很大。1974 年开发的 Ranson 评分是第一个预测 AP 的评分系统。在过去的几十年里,虽然 Ranson 评分仍然被广泛使用,但它被认为存在一定的局限性,例如预测能力较低。它还因计算最终评分需要 48 小时而受到批评,有人认为这可能会延迟治疗。随着我们对 AP 的认识不断提高,Ranson 评分作为 AP 的有效预后系统是否仍然相关?:本文综述了现有的证据,比较了 Ranson 评分与其他传统和新型评分系统在预后准确性、益处、局限性和临床适用性方面的差异。还评估了 Ranson 评分在修订亚特兰大分类方面的有效性。:Ranson 评分始终表现出与其他更新的评分系统相当的预后准确性,并且计算完整 Ranson 评分的 48 小时时间框架是其内在的优势,而不是弱点。这些方面,加上评分的易用性、实用性和普遍性,表明 Ranson 评分在现代临床实践中仍然具有相关性。