• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同评分系统和生化标志物在确定急性胰腺炎严重程度和并发症方面的有效性比较。

Comparison of the effectiveness of different scoring systems and biochemical markers in determining the severity and complications of acute pancreatitis.

作者信息

Aktaş Ahmet Ali, Taşar Pınar, Siğirli Deniz, Kiliçturgay Sadık Ayhan

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkiye.

Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2025 Feb 24;55(2):451-460. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5989. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5989
PMID:40342330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12058010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

The aim of the study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of different scoring systems and inflammatory markers in predicting the severity, local complications, pancreatic necrosis, and mortality of acute pancreatitis (AP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 357 patients whom the severity of pancreatitis was classified according to the Revised Atlanta Classification System diagnosed with AP were retrospectively examined. Also The APACHE II, BISAP, mCTSI, and Ranson scores of all patients were calculated. After determining the cut-off values for scoring systems and inflammatory markers with ROC analysis, comparison for AP severity, local complication, necrosis, and mortality.

RESULTS

In the study, 2.8% of patients had severe pancreatitis. It was found that the risk of developing local complications increased 2.82 times in cases with an 48-h CRP value >192 mg/L compared to those below this threshold, and 48.96 times in cases with an mCTSI score >2 compared to ≤ 2 cases. It was found that having a Ranson score >4 increased the risk of mortality by 9.07 times compared to having a score of ≤4 (p = 0.038). It was observed that having a BISAP >2 increased the risk of severe AP by 11.79 times compared to ≤2. In cases where the 48-h NLR value was >13.33, the risk of severe AP was found to have increased by 5.85 times.

CONCLUSION

Although the superiority of scoring systems could not be demonstrated in our study, CRP and MCTSI for local complications, BISAP for severity and Ranson score for mortality were the determining variables.

摘要

背景与研究目的

本研究旨在证明不同评分系统和炎症标志物在预测急性胰腺炎(AP)的严重程度、局部并发症、胰腺坏死及死亡率方面的有效性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析357例根据修订的亚特兰大分类系统诊断为AP且已对胰腺炎严重程度进行分类的患者的数据。同时计算所有患者的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、床边指数(BISAP)、改良CT严重指数(mCTSI)和兰森评分。通过ROC分析确定评分系统和炎症标志物的临界值后,比较AP的严重程度、局部并发症、坏死及死亡率。

结果

在本研究中,2.8%的患者患有重症胰腺炎。发现48小时C反应蛋白(CRP)值>192mg/L的患者发生局部并发症的风险比低于该阈值的患者增加2.82倍,mCTSI评分>2的患者比评分≤2的患者增加48.96倍。发现兰森评分>4的患者死亡风险比评分≤4的患者增加9.07倍(p = 0.038)。观察到BISAP>2的患者发生重症AP的风险比≤2的患者增加11.79倍。在48小时中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)值>13.33的患者中,发现重症AP的风险增加了5.85倍。

结论

尽管在我们的研究中未能证明评分系统的优越性,但CRP和MCTSI用于预测局部并发症、BISAP用于预测严重程度、兰森评分用于预测死亡率是决定性变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec0/12058010/546a0ca03df4/tjmed-55-02-451f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec0/12058010/2d012fa3fed3/tjmed-55-02-451f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec0/12058010/81f135e30604/tjmed-55-02-451f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec0/12058010/546a0ca03df4/tjmed-55-02-451f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec0/12058010/2d012fa3fed3/tjmed-55-02-451f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec0/12058010/81f135e30604/tjmed-55-02-451f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec0/12058010/546a0ca03df4/tjmed-55-02-451f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effectiveness of different scoring systems and biochemical markers in determining the severity and complications of acute pancreatitis.不同评分系统和生化标志物在确定急性胰腺炎严重程度和并发症方面的有效性比较。
Turk J Med Sci. 2025 Feb 24;55(2):451-460. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5989. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of the BISAP scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification.根据最新亚特兰大分类法比较BISAP评分对中国急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的预测价值
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Sep;21(9):689-694. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.118. Epub 2014 May 22.
3
Evaluation of the BISAP scoring system in prognostication of acute pancreatitis - A prospective observational study.BISAP 评分系统对急性胰腺炎预后评估的价值 - 一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
4
Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.预测急性胰腺炎严重程度的评分系统比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2387-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2387.
5
Severity stratification and prognostic prediction of patients with acute pancreatitis at early phase: A retrospective study.急性胰腺炎患者早期严重程度分层及预后预测:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e15275. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015275.
6
Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis: comparison with other scoring systems in predicting severity and organ failure.床边急性胰腺炎严重程度指数:与其他评分系统预测严重程度和器官衰竭的比较。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013 Dec;12(6):645-50. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60101-0.
7
[The role of four criteria in assessment of the severity and prognosis of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis].[四项标准在高脂血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后评估中的作用]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 1;55(9):695-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2016.09.008.
8
Evaluation of scoring systems and hematological parameters in the severity stratification of early-phase acute pancreatitis.早期急性胰腺炎严重程度分层中评分系统和血液学参数的评估
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 21;31(15):105236. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i15.105236.
9
Procalcitonin and BISAP score versus C-reactive protein and APACHE II score in early assessment of severity and outcome of acute pancreatitis.降钙素原和BISAP评分与C反应蛋白及APACHE II评分在急性胰腺炎严重程度和预后早期评估中的比较
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2012 May;69(5):425-31.
10
[The comparison of different clinical scoring systems for predicting prognosis in acute pancreatitis based on the revised Atlanta classification].基于修订的亚特兰大分类法的不同临床评分系统对急性胰腺炎预后预测的比较
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;52(8):668-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a three-species gut microbiome diagnostic model for acute pancreatitis and its association with systemic inflammation: a prospective cross-sectional study.急性胰腺炎三种肠道微生物群诊断模型的开发及其与全身炎症的关联:一项前瞻性横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):26034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11042-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of comorbidities on hospital mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis: a population-based study of 110,021 patients.探讨合并症对急性胰腺炎患者住院死亡率的影响:基于 110021 例患者的人群研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02730-6.
2
Dynamics of Serum Procalcitonin Can Predict Outcome in Patients of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis: A Prospective Analysis.血清降钙素原动态变化可预测感染性胰腺坏死患者的预后:一项前瞻性分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 May;68(5):2080-2089. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07758-4. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
3
Management of Necrotizing Pancreatitis.
坏死性胰腺炎的处理。
Adv Surg. 2022 Sep;56(1):13-35. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2022.02.010.
4
Ranson score to stratify severity in Acute Pancreatitis remains valid - Old is gold.Ranson 评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度的分层仍然有效——老方法也有价值。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;15(8):865-877. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1924058. Epub 2021 May 13.
5
Early laboratory biomarkers for severity in acute pancreatitis; A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性胰腺炎严重程度的早期实验室生物标志物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pancreatology. 2020 Oct;20(7):1302-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
6
Severe acute pancreatitis: surgical indications and treatment.重症急性胰腺炎:手术指征与治疗。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):521-535. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01944-6. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Acute pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎。
Lancet. 2020 Sep 5;396(10252):726-734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6.
8
Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index, and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Score in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II、改良计算机断层扫描严重程度指数以及急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度方面的比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;24(2):99-103. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23343.
9
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Observational Study.不同评分系统在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2020 Feb 10;12(2):e6943. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6943.
10
Computed Tomography Severity Index vs. Other Indices in the Prediction of Severity and Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Predictive Accuracy Meta-analysis.计算机断层扫描严重程度指数与其他指数在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度和死亡率中的比较:一项预测准确性的Meta分析
Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 27;10:1002. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01002. eCollection 2019.