• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于卵巢储备功能减退的患者,地屈孕酮预处理的黄体期刺激可能优于卵泡期刺激。

Dydrogesterone primed luteal phase stimulation may be better than follicular phase stimulation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve.

作者信息

Zeyneloglu Hulusi Bulent, Tohma Yusuf Aytac, Gunakan Emre, Onalan Gogsen, Eryılmaz Tahir

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021 Nov;37(11):1000-1002. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2021.1922885. Epub 2021 May 4.

DOI:10.1080/09513590.2021.1922885
PMID:33944650
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of luteal phase stimulation (LPS) and follicular phase stimulation (FPS) in two separate menstrual cycles (2-5 months intervals) of the same patient, utilizing LPS with dydrogesteron only.

METHODS

This retrospective case control study was conducted with patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) (Group 1) and infertile patients with Anti-Müllerian hormone >1.2 ng/mL (Group 2) undergoing two ovarian stimulations (FPS and LPS with dydrogesteron only) and two oocyte retrievals in two separate menstrual cycles (2-5 months intervals) in the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility of Baskent University, Ankara, between April 2019 and December 2019.

RESULTS

In group 1, the number of frozen embryos was significantly higher in LPS when compared to FPS; 1.71 vs. 0.54, ( < .001), respectively. In group 2, the number of frozen embryos was higher in LPS when compared to FPS (0.8 vs. 0.4) however the difference did not reach a statistical significance (: 0.157).

CONCLUSION

LPS may be beneficial especially in the patients with diminished ovarian reserve with follicular asynchronization in the menstrual onset. In addition, it should be kept in mind that dydrogesterone only may be used instead of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist to prevent possible luteinizing hormone rise in LPS.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们旨在比较同一患者在两个独立月经周期(间隔2 - 5个月)中黄体期刺激(LPS)和卵泡期刺激(FPS)的效果,仅使用地屈孕酮进行LPS。

方法

本回顾性病例对照研究纳入了卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)患者(第1组)和抗苗勒管激素>1.2 ng/mL的不孕患者(第2组),于2019年4月至2019年12月在安卡拉巴斯肯大学生殖内分泌与不孕症科进行了两次卵巢刺激(FPS和仅使用地屈孕酮的LPS)以及两次卵母细胞采集,两个刺激过程在两个独立月经周期(间隔2 - 5个月)中进行。

结果

在第1组中,与FPS相比,LPS时冷冻胚胎数量显著更高,分别为1.71 vs. 0.54,(P <.001)。在第2组中,LPS时冷冻胚胎数量高于FPS(0.8 vs. 0.4),但差异未达到统计学显著性(P:0.157)。

结论

LPS可能尤其有益于月经初潮时卵泡不同步的卵巢储备功能减退患者。此外,应记住在LPS中仅使用地屈孕酮可替代促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂以防止可能出现的黄体生成素升高。

相似文献

1
Dydrogesterone primed luteal phase stimulation may be better than follicular phase stimulation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve.对于卵巢储备功能减退的患者,地屈孕酮预处理的黄体期刺激可能优于卵泡期刺激。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021 Nov;37(11):1000-1002. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2021.1922885. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation increases the number of mature oocytes in older women with severe diminished ovarian reserve.黄体期卵巢刺激可增加卵巢储备严重减少的老年妇女的成熟卵母细胞数量。
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018 Jun;64(3):216-219. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2018.1448902. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
3
Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.黄体期无排卵卵泡导致有能力的卵子产生:在同一卵巢周期内比较卵泡期和黄体期刺激的患者内配对病例对照研究。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1442-1448. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey217.
4
Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation.在同一月经周期中对卵巢储备功能降低的人群进行卵泡期与黄体期卵巢刺激(双刺激)可产生相似的整倍体囊胚形成率:卵巢储备利用的新见解
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1488-1495.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
5
The best execution of the DuoStim strategy (double stimulation in the follicular and luteal phase of the same ovarian cycle) in patients who are poor ovarian responders.在卵巢反应不良的患者中,最好执行 DuoStim 策略(同一卵巢周期的卵泡期和黄体期双重刺激)。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Oct 15;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00655-3.
6
New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles.地屈孕酮在 IVF 促性腺激素预备周期中的新应用:一项纳入 516 个首次 IVF/ICSI 周期的随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex367.
7
New trial of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone versus a typical GnRH antagonist regimen in assisted reproductive technology.在辅助生殖技术中,使用地屈孕酮进行孕激素预处理的卵巢刺激与典型促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案的新试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Sep;298(3):663-671. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4856-8. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
8
Flexible ovarian stimulation in a poor responder: a case report and literature review.卵巢低反应患者的灵活促排卵:病例报告及文献复习。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Apr;26(4):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
9
Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Versus Mild Stimulation Protocol in Advanced Age Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing Their First Fertilization Cycle: A Retrospective Cohort Study.孕激素预处理卵巢刺激与轻度刺激方案在卵巢储备功能减退高龄患者行首次体外受精周期中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 24;12:801026. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.801026. eCollection 2021.
10
Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs conventional ovarian stimulation in patients with normal ovarian reserve treated for IVF: a large retrospective cohort study.黄体期卵巢刺激与常规卵巢刺激用于体外受精治疗的卵巢储备功能正常患者:一项大型回顾性队列研究
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2016 May;84(5):720-8. doi: 10.1111/cen.12983. Epub 2015 Dec 21.