Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, and Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
S Afr Med J. 2021 Feb 1;111(2):137-142. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14686.
Discharge diagnostic data from hospital administrative databases are often used to inform decisions relating to a variety of vital applications. These may include the allocation of resources, quality-of-care assessments, clinical research and formulation of healthcare policy. Accurately coded and reliably captured patient discharge data are of paramount importance for any hospital and health system to function efficiently.
To retrospectively examine the reliability of the International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD-10) discharge coding in Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital (RCWMCH)'s administrative database for primary and secondary discharge diagnoses, and to formulate recommendations for improvement to the current system.
This study was a retrospective folder review of 450 patient admissions to the short-stay and general paediatric wards at RCWMCH between 1 August 2013 and 1 September 2014. The principal investigator (PI) completed ICD-10 discharge coding for each admission and compared it with the corresponding admission data captured for each patient in the Clinicom (Siemens Medical Solutions, Germany) health information system. Agreement comparison was done to 4- and 3-character ICD-10 code specificity.
Of the initial 450 randomly selected folders, 396 (88%) were analysed during the folder review process. The median number of total diagnoses (primary diagnosis plus secondary diagnoses) coded by the PI folder review was 3, with a distribution of 1 - 10 (interquartile range (IQR) 2 - 4). The median number of total diagnoses coded in Clinicom was 1, with a distribution of 1 - 3 (IQR 1 - 1). Agreement of primary diagnosis coding to 4 characters was 26.3%, with slight improvement to 34.3% when assessed to 3 characters. Agreement of secondary diagnoses to 4 characters was 14.9%, and 27.7% when assessed to 3 characters.
Reliability of administrative ICD-10 discharge data from RCWMCH is poor. Inadequacies regarding the employment of dedicated and/or adequately trained coding personnel may significantly contribute to the problem and should be addressed.
医院管理数据库中的出院诊断数据常用于为各种重要应用提供决策依据。这些应用可能包括资源分配、护理质量评估、临床研究和医疗政策制定。准确编码和可靠捕获的患者出院数据对于任何医院和医疗系统的高效运行都至关重要。
回顾性检查红十字会儿童纪念医院(RCWMCH)管理数据库中用于主要和次要出院诊断的国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)出院编码的可靠性,并为改进当前系统提出建议。
本研究是对 2013 年 8 月 1 日至 2014 年 9 月 1 日期间 RCWMCH 短期住院和普通儿科病房的 450 名患者入院的回顾性文件夹审查。主要研究者(PI)对每位患者的入院进行 ICD-10 出院编码,并将其与 Clinicom(德国西门子医疗解决方案公司)健康信息系统中每位患者的相应入院数据进行比较。比较采用 4 位和 3 位 ICD-10 代码特异性进行。
在最初随机选择的 450 个文件夹中,有 396 个(88%)在文件夹审查过程中进行了分析。PI 文件夹审查中编码的总诊断数(主要诊断加次要诊断)中位数为 3,分布为 1-10(四分位距(IQR)2-4)。Clinom 中编码的总诊断数中位数为 1,分布为 1-3(IQR 1-1)。主要诊断编码到 4 位字符的一致性为 26.3%,评估到 3 位字符时略有提高到 34.3%。次要诊断编码到 4 位字符的一致性为 14.9%,评估到 3 位字符时为 27.7%。
RCWMCH 的管理 ICD-10 出院数据的可靠性较差。在雇用专门的和/或经过充分培训的编码人员方面的不足可能会严重影响这一问题,应予以解决。