• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

死活不论:微生物活力处理揭示了鱼类肠道微生物组中活跃和不活跃的细菌成分。

Dead or alive: microbial viability treatment reveals both active and inactive bacterial constituents in the fish gut microbiota.

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

CSIRO, Agriculture and Food, Hobart, Tas, Australia.

出版信息

J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Nov;131(5):2528-2538. doi: 10.1111/jam.15113. Epub 2021 May 4.

DOI:10.1111/jam.15113
PMID:33945191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8596808/
Abstract

AIMS

This study evaluated the microbial viability of fish gut microbiota in both digesta (faecal) and mucosal samples using a modified propidium monoazide (PMA) protocol, followed by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Digesta and gut mucosal samples from farmed yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi) were collected and a modified PMA treatment was applied prior to DNA extraction to differentiate both active and nonviable microbial cells in the samples. All samples were then sequenced using a standard 16S rRNA approach. The digesta and mucosal samples contained significantly different bacterial communities, with a higher diversity observed in digesta samples. In addition, PMA treatment significantly reduced the microbial diversity and richness of digesta and mucosal samples and depleted bacterial constituents typically considered to be important within fish, such as Lactobacillales and Clostridales taxa.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that important bacterial members may not be active in the fish gut microbiota. In particular, several beneficial lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were identified as nonviable bacterial cells, potentially influencing the functional potential of the fish microbiota.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACTS OF THE STUDY

Standardizing the methods for characterizing the fish microbiota are paramount in order to compare studies. In this study, we showed that both sample type and PMA treatment influence the bacterial communities found in the fish gut microbiota. Our findings also suggest that several microbes previously described in the fish gut may not be active constituents. As a result, these factors should be considered in future studies to better evaluate the active bacterial communities associated with the host.

摘要

目的

本研究采用改良的单脒基丙啶(PMA)方案,对养殖黄鳍金枪鱼(Seriola lalandi)的消化物(粪便)和黏膜样本中的鱼肠道微生物区系的微生物活力进行评估,随后进行 16S 核糖体 RNA(rRNA)基因测序。

方法和结果

采集养殖黄鳍金枪鱼的消化物和肠道黏膜样本,并在提取 DNA 之前应用改良的 PMA 处理,以区分样本中活跃和非存活的微生物细胞。然后使用标准的 16S rRNA 方法对所有样本进行测序。消化物和黏膜样本中含有明显不同的细菌群落,消化物样本中的多样性更高。此外,PMA 处理显著降低了消化物和黏膜样本中的微生物多样性和丰富度,并消耗了被认为是鱼类中重要组成部分的细菌成分,如乳杆菌目和梭菌目分类群。

结论

这些发现表明,重要的细菌成员可能在鱼类肠道微生物群中不活跃。特别是,几种有益的乳酸菌(LAB)被鉴定为非存活细菌细胞,可能影响鱼类微生物群的功能潜力。

研究的意义和影响

为了进行比较研究,规范表征鱼类微生物群的方法至关重要。在本研究中,我们表明,样本类型和 PMA 处理都会影响鱼类肠道微生物群中发现的细菌群落。我们的研究结果还表明,以前在鱼类肠道中描述的几种微生物可能不是活跃的组成部分。因此,在未来的研究中应考虑这些因素,以更好地评估与宿主相关的活跃细菌群落。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/5367245be61d/JAM-131-2528-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/c47b0882f76d/JAM-131-2528-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/ea1415bc890c/JAM-131-2528-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/c49a9d47f4a5/JAM-131-2528-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/03991c81f6d9/JAM-131-2528-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/84392f6a1bba/JAM-131-2528-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/5367245be61d/JAM-131-2528-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/c47b0882f76d/JAM-131-2528-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/ea1415bc890c/JAM-131-2528-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/c49a9d47f4a5/JAM-131-2528-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/03991c81f6d9/JAM-131-2528-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/84392f6a1bba/JAM-131-2528-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b944/8596808/5367245be61d/JAM-131-2528-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Dead or alive: microbial viability treatment reveals both active and inactive bacterial constituents in the fish gut microbiota.死活不论:微生物活力处理揭示了鱼类肠道微生物组中活跃和不活跃的细菌成分。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Nov;131(5):2528-2538. doi: 10.1111/jam.15113. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Characterization of the bacterial microbiome in first-pass meconium using propidium monoazide (PMA) to exclude nonviable bacterial DNA.使用单叠氮碘化丙啶(PMA)排除无活性细菌DNA对首次排出胎粪中细菌微生物组进行表征。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019 May;68(5):378-385. doi: 10.1111/lam.13119. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
3
Reducing Viability Bias in Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Preterm Infants at Risk of NEC and Sepsis.降低对有坏死性小肠结肠炎和败血症风险的早产儿肠道微生物群分析中的生存偏差。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Jun 6;7:237. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00237. eCollection 2017.
4
Comparison of DNA-, PMA-, and RNA-based 16S rRNA Illumina sequencing for detection of live bacteria in water.基于 DNA、PMA 和 RNA 的 Illumina 16S rRNA 测序技术在水中活菌检测中的比较。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 18;7(1):5752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02516-3.
5
Whole microbial community viability is not quantitatively reflected by propidium monoazide sequencing approach.吖啶橙单染色测序方法不能定量反映整个微生物群落的活性。
Microbiome. 2021 Jan 21;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00961-3.
6
The Viable Microbiome of Human Milk Differs from the Metataxonomic Profile.人乳中的可行微生物组与分类组图谱不同。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 13;13(12):4445. doi: 10.3390/nu13124445.
7
The effects of removing dead bacteria by propidium monoazide on the profile of salivary microbiome.吖啶橙单染法去除死菌对唾液微生物组特征的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01832-5.
8
Impacts of the Marine Hatchery Built Environment, Water and Feed on Mucosal Microbiome Colonization Across Ontogeny in Yellowtail Kingfish, .海洋孵化场的建造环境、水和饲料对黄尾鰤个体发育过程中黏膜微生物群落定殖的影响
Front Mar Sci. 2021 May;8. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.676731. Epub 2021 May 13.
9
Loss of gut microbial diversity in the cultured, agastric fish, Mexican pike silverside (: Atherinopsidae).在人工养殖的无胃鱼,墨西哥鱵鱼(Atherinopsidae)中,肠道微生物多样性的丧失。
PeerJ. 2022 Mar 7;10:e13052. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13052. eCollection 2022.
10
Alternative dietary protein and water temperature influence the skin and gut microbial communities of yellowtail kingfish ().替代膳食蛋白质和水温影响黄尾鰤的皮肤和肠道微生物群落。
PeerJ. 2020 Mar 19;8:e8705. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8705. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
DNA from non-viable bacteria biases diversity estimates in the corals Acropora loripes and Pocillopora acuta.来自无法存活细菌的DNA会使鹿角珊瑚和尖锐小枝鹿角珊瑚的多样性估计产生偏差。
Environ Microbiome. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40793-023-00541-6.
2
Feed microbiome: confounding factor affecting fish gut microbiome studies.饲料微生物组:影响鱼类肠道微生物组研究的混杂因素。
ISME Commun. 2022 Feb 2;2(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s43705-022-00096-6.
3
Structural differences in the gut microbiome of bats using terrestrial vs. aquatic feeding resources.

本文引用的文献

1
Tax4Fun2: prediction of habitat-specific functional profiles and functional redundancy based on 16S rRNA gene sequences.Tax4Fun2:基于16S rRNA基因序列预测特定栖息地的功能谱和功能冗余
Environ Microbiome. 2020 May 18;15(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40793-020-00358-7.
2
Antibiotic-induced alterations and repopulation dynamics of yellowtail kingfish microbiota.抗生素诱导的黄尾鰤微生物群的变化及重新定殖动态
Anim Microbiome. 2020 Aug 3;2(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00046-4.
3
Association of gut microbiota with metabolism in juvenile Atlantic salmon.
蝙蝠肠道微生物组在利用陆地和水生食物资源方面的结构差异。
BMC Microbiol. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02836-7.
4
Effect of in vitro cultivation on human gut microbiota composition using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and metabolomics approach.采用 16S rDNA 扩增子测序和代谢组学方法研究体外培养对人类肠道微生物群落组成的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 21;13(1):3026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29637-2.
5
You are more than what you eat: potentially adaptive enrichment of microbiome functions across bat dietary niches.你不仅仅是你所吃的东西:蝙蝠饮食生态位中微生物组功能的潜在适应性富集。
Anim Microbiome. 2021 Dec 14;3(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00139-8.
肠道微生物群与幼年大西洋鲑鱼代谢的关联。
Microbiome. 2020 Nov 16;8(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00938-2.
4
Microbiome Profiling Reveals a Microbial Dysbiosis During a Natural Outbreak of Tenacibaculosis (Yellow Mouth) in Atlantic Salmon.微生物组分析揭示了大西洋鲑鱼自然爆发杀鲑气单胞菌病(黄口病)期间的微生物群落失调。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Oct 22;11:586387. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.586387. eCollection 2020.
5
Imprinting statistically sound conclusions for gut microbiota in comparative animal studies: A case study with diet and teleost fishes.在具有可比性的动物研究中对肠道微生物组进行具有统计学意义的结论标记:以饮食和硬骨鱼类为例的一项案例研究。
Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2020 Dec;36:100738. doi: 10.1016/j.cbd.2020.100738. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
6
Investigating Both Mucosal Immunity and Microbiota in Response to Gut Enteritis in Yellowtail Kingfish.研究黄尾鰤对肠道肠炎反应中的黏膜免疫和微生物群。
Microorganisms. 2020 Aug 20;8(9):1267. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091267.
7
Current Sampling Methods for Gut Microbiota: A Call for More Precise Devices.当前肠道微生物组的采样方法:呼吁更精确的设备。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Apr 9;10:151. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00151. eCollection 2020.
8
Alternative dietary protein and water temperature influence the skin and gut microbial communities of yellowtail kingfish ().替代膳食蛋白质和水温影响黄尾鰤的皮肤和肠道微生物群落。
PeerJ. 2020 Mar 19;8:e8705. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8705. eCollection 2020.
9
Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.使用QIIME 2进行可重复、交互式、可扩展和可延伸的微生物组数据科学研究。
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9.
10
Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?粪便移植中细菌的存活情况:哪些细菌能够存活?
EBioMedicine. 2019 Mar;41:509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Feb 19.