University Hospital for Small Animals of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Australia.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2021 Jul;31(4):459-468. doi: 10.1111/vec.13062. Epub 2021 May 4.
To determine whether basal-bolus administration of glargine insulin is a safe and effective alternative treatment compared to the standard continuous rate infusion (CRI) protocol.
Prospective randomized clinical trial.
University teaching hospital.
Twenty cats diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
The cats were block-randomized to either a CRI protocol using regular insulin (CRI-group; n = 10) or a basal-bolus SC and IM glargine protocol (glargine-group, n = 10). Baseline blood gases, electrolytes, glucose, and β-hydroxybutyrate (β-OHB) concentrations were measured at the time of admission and later at predefined intervals until reaching the primary endpoint of the study, defined as a β-hydroxybutyrate concentration < 2.55 mmol/L.
The main outcome measure was time (h) to resolution of ketonemia. Secondary outcome measures were time until first improvement of hyperglycemia and ketonemia, decrease of glucose to ≤13.9 mmol/L (250 mg/dL), resolution of acidosis, consumption of first meal, and discharge from hospital. Additionally, occurrence of treatment-associated adverse events and death were compared. Seventeen cats (85%) survived to discharge, with no difference in survival between groups (P = 1.0). Median times to β-OHB < 2.55 mmol/L were 42 (CRI-group) and 30 (glargine-group) hours, respectively (P = 0.114). Median times to first improvement of hyperglycemia (glargine-group: 2 h; CRI-group: 6 h; P = 0.018) and until discharge from hospital (glargine-group: 140 h; CRI-group: 174 h; P = 0.033) were significantly shorter in the glargine-group. No significant differences were observed in any other parameter under investigation (P > 0.05).
Basal-bolus administration of glargine insulin appears to be an effective and safe alternative to the current standard CRI-protocol for the management of DKA in cats. The positive outcomes and simplicity make it a viable option for the treatment of feline DKA.
比较甘精胰岛素基础-餐时给药与常规持续速率输注(CRI)方案,确定前者作为替代治疗是否安全有效。
前瞻性随机临床试验。
大学教学医院。
20 只诊断为糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的猫。
将猫随机分为 CRI 方案(使用常规胰岛素,CRI 组,n=10)或 SC 和 IM 甘精胰岛素基础-餐时给药方案(甘精胰岛素组,n=10)。在入院时和之后的预定义间隔时间测量基础血气、电解质、血糖和β-羟丁酸(β-OHB)浓度,直至达到研究的主要终点,定义为β-羟丁酸浓度<2.55mmol/L。
主要结局指标为酮血症缓解时间(h)。次要结局指标为首次改善高血糖和酮血症时间、血糖降至≤13.9mmol/L(250mg/dL)时间、酸中毒缓解时间、首次进食时间和出院时间。此外,还比较了治疗相关不良事件和死亡的发生情况。17 只猫(85%)存活出院,两组间生存率无差异(P=1.0)。β-OHB<2.55mmol/L 的中位时间分别为 42(CRI 组)和 30(甘精胰岛素组)小时(P=0.114)。首次改善高血糖(甘精胰岛素组:2 小时;CRI 组:6 小时;P=0.018)和出院时间(甘精胰岛素组:140 小时;CRI 组:174 小时;P=0.033)在甘精胰岛素组明显更短。在其他研究参数中未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。
与当前的 CRI 标准方案相比,甘精胰岛素基础-餐时给药似乎是治疗猫 DKA 的有效且安全的替代方案。其积极的结果和简单性使其成为治疗猫 DKA 的可行选择。