• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威斯康星州与年龄相关听力损伤分类系统的进一步评估与应用。

Further Evaluation and Application of the Wisconsin Age-Related Hearing Impairment Classification System.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2021 Jun 14;30(2):359-375. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00207. Epub 2021 May 4.

DOI:10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00207
PMID:33945294
Abstract

Purpose The primary purpose of this report is to further evaluate the Wisconsin Age-Related Hearing Impairment Classification System (WARHICS) scheme for the classification of audiograms obtained from older adults, ages 50-89 years. Method This was a retrospective analysis of data from 11,729 older adults included in two population, one community, and two clinical data sets. To aid in the interpretation of the audiogram classifications, the functional significance of audiogram categories was evaluated using Hearing Handicap Inventory-Screen scores available for 10,330 of these same individuals. Results A WARHICS level could be obtained successfully for 99.5% of the 11,729 audiograms included in these analyses. It was applied successfully to population, community, and clinical samples. WARHICS Level 8 audiograms, corresponding to a broad profound hearing impairment (pure-tone thresholds from 500 to 8000 Hz, all > 80 dB HL), were very rare (.1% prevalence). WARHICS subtypes, designed to identify those with high-frequency notched audiograms or flat audiograms, occurred only 3%-6% of the time, depending on the data set. When compared to the current hearing-impairment grading system of the World Health Organization (WHO), several WARHICS levels fell within a given WHO hearing-impairment grade suggesting a finer grained categorization by the WARHICS. The Hearing Handicap Inventory-Screen scores provided justification for the fine-grained categorization according to the WARHICS. It is also demonstrated that the WARHICS levels could be extended to the classification of audiograms from all adults, regardless of age. Finally, a WARHICS-WHO hybrid classification scheme is proposed for future evaluation. Conclusions Although the WARHICS was developed from a population data set, it was demonstrated here to be applicable to population, community, and clinical data sets for adults aged 50-89 years. The applicability of the WARHICS or a WARHICS-WHO hybrid to population data sets that included younger adults suggests that this classification system has the potential to be applied even more broadly than just to age-related hearing loss.

摘要

目的 本报告的主要目的是进一步评估威斯康星州年龄相关性听力障碍分类系统(WARHICS)方案,用于对 50-89 岁老年人的听力图进行分类。

方法 这是对来自两个人群、一个社区和两个临床数据集的 11729 名老年人数据的回顾性分析。为了帮助解释听力图分类,使用可用于其中 10330 名相同个体的听力障碍问卷-筛查分数评估了听力图类别的功能意义。

结果 在这些分析中,成功获得了 11729 个听力图中的 99.5%的 WARHICS 级别。它成功应用于人群、社区和临床样本。与广泛的深度听力障碍(500-8000 Hz 的所有纯音阈值> 80 dB HL)相对应的 WARHICS 级别 8 听力图非常罕见(患病率为 0.1%)。为了识别高频有缺口的听力图或平坦的听力图而设计的 WARHICS 亚型仅在 3%-6%的时间出现,具体取决于数据集。与世界卫生组织(WHO)当前的听力障碍分级系统相比,几个 WARHICS 级别落在给定的 WHO 听力障碍等级内,表明 WARHICS 具有更细的分类。听力障碍问卷-筛查分数为根据 WARHICS 进行细分类提供了依据。还表明,无论年龄大小,都可以将 WARHICS 级别扩展到所有成年人的听力图分类。最后,提出了一个 WARHICS-WHO 混合分类方案以供未来评估。

结论 尽管 WARHICS 是从人群数据集开发而来的,但本研究证明它适用于 50-89 岁成年人的人群、社区和临床数据集。WARHICS 或 WARHICS-WHO 混合对包括年轻成年人的人群数据集的适用性表明,该分类系统具有更广泛应用的潜力,而不仅仅局限于年龄相关性听力损失。

相似文献

1
Further Evaluation and Application of the Wisconsin Age-Related Hearing Impairment Classification System.威斯康星州与年龄相关听力损伤分类系统的进一步评估与应用。
Am J Audiol. 2021 Jun 14;30(2):359-375. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00207. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Some observations on the nature of the audiometric 4000 hz notch: data from 3430 veterans.关于听力计4000赫兹切迹性质的一些观察:来自3430名退伍军人的数据。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jan;22(1):23-33. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.1.4.
3
A Novel Method for Classifying Hearing Impairment in Epidemiological Studies of Aging: The Wisconsin Age-Related Hearing Impairment Classification Scale.一种在衰老流行病学研究中对听力障碍进行分类的新方法:威斯康星与年龄相关听力障碍分类量表
Am J Audiol. 2020 Mar 5;29(1):59-67. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00021. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
The World Health Organization's hearing-impairment grading system: an evaluation for unaided communication in age-related hearing loss.世界卫生组织的听力障碍分级系统:年龄相关性听力损失中非助听听阈评估。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Jan;58(1):12-20. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1518598. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Pure tone audiogram classification using deep learning techniques.使用深度学习技术进行纯音听力图分类。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2024 Sep;49(5):595-603. doi: 10.1111/coa.14170. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.高频纯音听力损失、噪声环境下听力测试(HINT)阈值与清晰度指数之间的关系。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(10):779-88. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.10.4.
7
Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.3430名退伍军人的噪声中言语测试临床经验:与纯音阈值及安静环境下言语识别的比较
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):405-23. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.3.
8
[The "Muenster classification" of high frequency hearing loss following cisplatin chemotherapy].[顺铂化疗后高频听力损失的“明斯特分类”]
HNO. 2007 Apr;55(4):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s00106-005-1368-1.
9
The factors associated with a self-perceived hearing handicap in elderly people with hearing impairment--results from a community-based study.听力受损老年人自我感知听力障碍的相关因素——一项基于社区研究的结果
Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):576-83. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ac127a.
10
Low prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study.听力损失老年人中助听器使用率较低:听力损失流行病学研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Sep;46(9):1075-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06643.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Easy as 1-2-3: Development and Evaluation of a Simple yet Valid Audiogram-Classification System.易如1-2-3:一种简单而有效的听力图分类系统的开发与评估
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241260041. doi: 10.1177/23312165241260041.
2
U.S. Population Data on Hearing Loss, Trouble Hearing, and Hearing-Device Use in Adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-12, 2015-16, and 2017-20.美国成年人听力损失、听力障碍和使用助听设备的数据:2011-2012 年、2015-2016 年和 2017-2018 年全国健康和营养调查。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231160978. doi: 10.1177/23312165231160978.
3
Using Automatic Speech Recognition to Optimize Hearing-Aid Time Constants.
使用自动语音识别优化助听器时间常数。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;16:779062. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.779062. eCollection 2022.
4
OPRA-RS: A Hearing-Aid Fitting Method Based on Automatic Speech Recognition and Random Search.OPRA-RS:一种基于自动语音识别和随机搜索的助听器验配方法。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 21;16:779048. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.779048. eCollection 2022.
5
Older adult recognition error patterns when listening to interrupted speech and speech in steady-state noise.老年人在听中断的言语和稳态噪声中的言语时的识别错误模式。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Nov;150(5):3428. doi: 10.1121/10.0006975.