Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, P. R. China.
School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0250998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250998. eCollection 2021.
The current study examined how emotional faces impact on attentional control at both involuntary and voluntary levels in children with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A non-face single target was either presented in isolation or synchronously with emotional face distractors namely angry, happy and neutral faces. ASD and typically developing children made more erroneous saccades towards emotional distractors relative to neutral distractors in parafoveal and peripheral conditions. Remote distractor effects were observed on saccade latency in both groups regardless of distractor type, whereby time taken to initiate an eye movement to the target was longest in central distractor conditions, followed by parafoveal and peripheral distractor conditions. The remote distractor effect was greater for angry faces compared to happy faces in the ASD group. Proportions of failed disengagement trials from central distractors, for the first saccade, were higher in the angry distractor condition compared with the other two distractor conditions in ASD, and this effect was absent for the typical group. Eye movement results suggest difficulties in disengaging from fixated angry faces in ASD. Atypical disengagement from angry faces at the voluntary level could have consequences for the development of higher-level socio-communicative skills in ASD.
本研究考察了情绪面孔如何影响自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童和普通儿童在无意识和自愿水平上的注意力控制。非面部单一目标要么单独呈现,要么与情绪面孔分心物(即愤怒、快乐和中性面孔)同步呈现。与中性分心物相比,ASD 儿童和普通儿童在周边和周边条件下对情绪分心物的错误扫视更多。两组在注视点以外的条件下,无论分心物类型如何,在扫视潜伏期上都观察到了远程分心物效应,即朝向目标的眼动启动时间在中央分心物条件下最长,其次是周边和周边分心物条件。在 ASD 组中,与快乐面孔相比,愤怒面孔的远程分心物效应更大。与其他两种分心物条件相比,在 ASD 中,第一个扫视时从中央分心物中未能脱离的试验比例在愤怒分心物条件下更高,而在典型组中则没有这种效应。眼动结果表明,ASD 儿童难以从注视的愤怒面孔中脱离。在自愿水平上,对愤怒面孔的脱离不典型可能会对 ASD 中更高层次的社会交际技能的发展产生影响。