Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Semmelweisstraße 10, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Social Psychology, University of Leipzig, Neumarkt 9-19, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 11;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03093-6.
Major depressive disorder has been associated with specific attentional biases in processing emotional facial expressions: heightened attention for negative and decreased attention for positive faces. However, using visual search paradigms, previous reaction-time-based research failed, in general, to find evidence for increased spatial attention toward negative facial expressions and reduced spatial attention toward positive facial expressions in depressed individuals. Eye-tracking analyses allow for a more detailed examination of visual search processes over time during the perception of multiple stimuli and can provide more specific insights into the attentional processing of multiple emotional stimuli.
Gaze behavior of 38 clinically depressed individuals and 38 gender matched healthy controls was compared in a face-in-the-crowd task. Pictures of happy, angry, and neutral facial expressions were utilized as target and distractor stimuli. Four distinct measures of eye gaze served as dependent variables: (a) latency to the target face, (b) number of distractor faces fixated prior to fixating the target, (c) mean fixation time per distractor face before fixating the target and (d) mean fixation time on the target.
Depressed and healthy individuals did not differ in their manual response times. Our eye-tracking data revealed no differences between study groups in attention guidance to emotional target faces as well as in the duration of attention allocation to emotional distractor and target faces. However, depressed individuals fixated fewer distractor faces before fixating the target than controls, regardless of valence of expressions.
Depressed individuals seem to process angry and happy expressions in crowds of faces mainly in the same way as healthy individuals. Our data indicate no biased attention guidance to emotional targets and no biased processing of angry and happy distractors and targets in depression during visual search. Under conditions of clear task demand depressed individuals seem to be able to allocate and guide their attention in crowds of angry and happy faces as efficiently as healthy individuals.
重度抑郁症与处理情绪面部表情时的特定注意力偏差有关:对负面表情的注意力增强,对正面表情的注意力减弱。然而,使用视觉搜索范式,以前基于反应时的研究普遍未能发现抑郁个体对负面面部表情的空间注意力增加和对正面面部表情的空间注意力减少的证据。眼动追踪分析允许更详细地检查在感知多个刺激时的视觉搜索过程,并可以更具体地了解对多个情绪刺激的注意力处理。
在人群中的面孔任务中,比较了 38 名临床抑郁个体和 38 名性别匹配的健康对照者的注视行为。高兴、生气和中性的面部表情图片被用作目标和分心刺激。注视行为的四个不同测量指标作为因变量:(a)注视目标面孔的潜伏期,(b)在注视目标之前注视分心面孔的数量,(c)在注视目标之前注视每个分心面孔的平均注视时间,以及(d)注视目标的平均注视时间。
抑郁和健康个体的手动反应时间没有差异。我们的眼动追踪数据显示,研究组之间在情绪目标面孔的注意力引导以及对情绪分心和目标面孔的注意力分配持续时间方面没有差异。然而,抑郁个体在注视目标之前注视的分心面孔比对照组少,而与表情的效价无关。
抑郁个体在处理人群中的愤怒和高兴表情时似乎与健康个体的方式主要相同。我们的数据表明,在视觉搜索中,抑郁个体对情绪目标没有偏向性的注意力引导,也没有对愤怒和高兴的分心和目标进行偏向性的处理。在明确任务需求的条件下,抑郁个体似乎能够像健康个体一样有效地在愤怒和高兴的面孔人群中分配和引导他们的注意力。