Department of Radiology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Department of Radiology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Clin Imaging. 2021 Nov;79:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
To assess vascular opacifications, the efficiency, and interobserver agreement (IOA) of five different computed tomography angiography (CTA) brain death (BD) scoring systems in patients with and without cranial interventions, for determining alternative findings correctly supporting BD diagnosis by CTA even in cranial intervention presence.
45 patients clinically identified with BD and evaluated with CTA were included. IOA of five different scoring systems used for CTA BD diagnosis, the effect of intracranial interventions on scoring systems, and vascular opacification were evaluated.
IOA was almost perfect (κ = 0.843-0.911, p < 0.05) and substantial (κ = 0.771-0.776, p < 0.05) in all scoring systems. Significant relationships were observed between craniectomy presence and middle cerebral artery M4 segment and internal cerebral vein (ICV) opacification. No opacification was observed in straight sinus (SS) by observers in any of the craniectomized patients.
IOA of CTA scoring systems is adequate. But a significant degree of false-negative results is observed due to ICV filling in craniectomy cases. Opacification presence in SS can give an idea of BD in these cases.
评估五种不同的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)脑死亡(BD)评分系统在有和无颅干预的患者中的血管显影、效率和观察者间一致性(IOA),以正确确定通过 CTA 支持 BD 诊断的替代发现,即使存在颅干预。
纳入 45 例临床诊断为 BD 并接受 CTA 评估的患者。评估了用于 CTA BD 诊断的五种不同评分系统的 IOA、颅内干预对评分系统的影响以及血管显影。
所有评分系统的 IOA 均为极好(κ=0.843-0.911,p<0.05)和高度一致(κ=0.771-0.776,p<0.05)。在存在开颅术的情况下,观察到大脑中动脉 M4 段和脑内静脉(ICV)显影与大脑中动脉 M4 段和脑内静脉(ICV)显影之间存在显著关系。在任何开颅患者中,观察者均未观察到直窦(SS)显影。
CTA 评分系统的 IOA 是足够的。但是,由于开颅术病例中 ICV 充盈,观察到相当程度的假阴性结果。在这些情况下,SS 中的显影存在可以提示 BD。