Narayan Edward, Barreto Michelle, Hantzopoulou Georgia-Constantina, Tilbrook Alan
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 30;11(5):1287. doi: 10.3390/ani11051287.
In this retrospective study, we conducted a desktop-based analysis of published literature using the ScienceDirect™ search engine to determine the proportion of livestock research within the last 7 years (2015-2021) that have applied animal welfare assessment combining objective measures of physiological stress and evaluation of climate change factors in order to provide an account of livestock productivity. From the search results, 563 published articles were reviewed. We found that the majority of the literature had discussed animal production outcomes ( = 491) and animal welfare ( = 453) either individually or in conjunction with another topic. The most popular occurrence was the combination of animal welfare assessment, objective measures of stress physiology and production outcomes discussed collectively ( = 218). We found that only 125 articles had discussed the impact of climate change (22.20%) on livestock production and/or vice versa. Furthermore, only 9.4% ( = 53) of articles had discussed all four factors and published research was skewed towards the dairy sector. Overall, this retrospective paper highlights that although research into animal welfare assessment, objective measures of stress and climate change has been applied across livestock production systems (monogastrics and ruminants), there remains a shortfall of investigation on how these key factors interact to influence livestock production. Furthermore, emerging technologies that can boost the quantitative evaluation of animal welfare are needed for both intensive and extensive production systems.
在这项回顾性研究中,我们使用ScienceDirect™搜索引擎对已发表的文献进行了基于桌面的分析,以确定过去7年(2015 - 2021年)内将生理应激的客观测量与气候变化因素评估相结合以描述牲畜生产力的畜牧研究的比例。从搜索结果中,我们审查了563篇已发表的文章。我们发现,大多数文献单独或与其他主题一起讨论了动物生产成果(n = 491)和动物福利(n = 453)。最常见的情况是动物福利评估、应激生理学的客观测量和生产成果的综合讨论(n = 218)。我们发现只有125篇文章讨论了气候变化对畜牧生产的影响(22.20%),反之亦然。此外,只有9.4%(n = 53)的文章讨论了所有四个因素,且已发表的研究偏向于乳制品行业。总体而言,这篇回顾性论文强调,尽管对动物福利评估、应激的客观测量和气候变化的研究已应用于畜牧生产系统(单胃动物和反刍动物),但在这些关键因素如何相互作用以影响畜牧生产方面仍存在研究不足。此外,无论是集约化还是粗放型生产系统,都需要能够促进动物福利定量评估的新兴技术。