Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Roy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Sep;49(9):2377-2388. doi: 10.1007/s10439-021-02767-2. Epub 2021 May 4.
Enhanced intrapulmonary gas transport enables oscillatory ventilation modalities to support gas exchange using extremely low tidal volumes at high frequencies. However, it is unknown whether gas transport rates can be improved by combining multiple frequencies of oscillation simultaneously. The goal of this study was to investigate distributed gas transport in vivo during multi-frequency oscillatory ventilation (MFOV) as compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). We hypothesized that MFOV would result in more uniform rates of gas transport compared to HFOV, measured using contrast-enhanced CT imaging during wash-in of xenon gas. In 13 pigs, xenon wash-in equilibration rates were comparable between CMV and MFOV, but 21 to 39% slower for HFOV. By contrast, the root-mean-square delivered volume was lowest for MFOV, increased by 70% during HFOV and 365% during CMV. Overall gas transport heterogeneity was similar across all modalities, but gravitational gradients and regional patchiness of specific ventilation contributed to regional ventilation heterogeneity, depending on ventilator modality. We conclude that MFOV combines benefits of low lung stretch, similar to HFOV, but with fast rates of gas transport, similar to CMV.
增强的肺内气体传输使振荡通气模式能够使用极高频率的极低潮气量来支持气体交换。然而,目前尚不清楚同时结合多种频率的振荡是否可以提高气体传输速率。本研究的目的是与常规机械通气(CMV)或高频振荡通气(HFOV)相比,研究多频振荡通气(MFOV)期间体内分布气体传输情况。我们假设与 HFOV 相比,MFOV 会导致更均匀的气体传输速率,这可以通过氙气冲洗过程中的对比增强 CT 成像来测量。在 13 头猪中,CMV 和 MFOV 之间的氙气冲洗平衡速率相当,但 HFOV 要慢 21%至 39%。相比之下,MFOV 的均方根输送量最低,HFOV 增加 70%,CMV 增加 365%。所有通气模式的整体气体传输异质性相似,但重力梯度和特定通气的区域不均匀性取决于通气模式,导致区域通气异质性。我们得出结论,MFOV 结合了类似于 HFOV 的低肺拉伸的优点,但气体传输速率类似于 CMV。