• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济评估中纳入其他意外后果:免疫接种和结核病成本效益分析的系统评价

Inclusion of Additional Unintended Consequences in Economic Evaluation: A Systematic Review of Immunization and Tuberculosis Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.

作者信息

Nymark Liv Solvår, Miller Alex, Vassall Anna

机构信息

Department of Global Health, The Academic Medical Center (AMC), The University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Independent Researcher, London, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Dec;5(4):587-603. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00269-4. Epub 2021 May 4.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-021-00269-4
PMID:33948928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8096359/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to review economic evaluations of immunization and tuberculosis to determine the extent to which additional unintended consequences were taken into account in the analysis and to describe the methodological approaches used to estimate these, where possible.

METHODS

We sourced the vaccine economic evaluations from a previous systematic review by Nymark et al. (2009-2015) and searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase from 2015 to 2019 using the same search strategy. For tuberculosis economic evaluations, we extracted studies from 2009 to 2019 that were published in a previous review by Siapka et al. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Studies were classified according to the categories and subcategories (e.g., herd immunity, non-specific effects, and labor productivity) defined in a framework identifying additional unintended consequences by Nymark and Vassall. Where possible, methods for estimating the additional unintended consequences categories and subcategories were described. We evaluated the reporting quality of included studies according to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) extraction guideline.

RESULTS

We identified 177 vaccine cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) between 2009 and 2019 that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 98 included unintended consequences. Of the total 98 CEAs, overall health consequence categories were included 73 times; biological categories: herd immunity 43 times; pathogen response: resistance 15 times; and cross-protection 15 times. For health consequences pertaining to the supply-side (health systems) categories, side effects were included five times. On the nonhealth demand side (intrahousehold), labor productivity was included 60 times. We identified 29 tuberculosis CEAs from 2009 to 2019 that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, six articles included labor productivity, four included indirect transmission effects, and one included resistance. Between 2009 and 2019, only 34% of tuberculosis CEAs included additional unintended consequences, compared with 55% of vaccine CEAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of additional unintended consequences in economic evaluations of immunization and tuberculosis continues to be limited. Additional unintended consequences of economic benefits, such as those examined in this review and especially those that occur outside the health system, offer valuable information to analysts. Further work on appropriate ways to value these additional unintended consequences is still warranted.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是回顾免疫接种和结核病的经济评估,以确定在分析中考虑额外意外后果的程度,并尽可能描述用于估计这些后果的方法。

方法

我们从Nymark等人(2009 - 2015年)之前的系统评价中获取疫苗经济评估资料,并使用相同的检索策略在2015年至2019年期间检索PubMed/MEDLINE和Embase。对于结核病经济评估,我们从Siapka等人之前的综述中提取2009年至2019年发表的研究。我们遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。研究根据Nymark和Vassall确定额外意外后果的框架中定义的类别和子类别(例如群体免疫、非特异性效应和劳动生产率)进行分类。在可能的情况下,描述了估计额外意外后果类别和子类别的方法。我们根据综合卫生经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)提取指南评估纳入研究的报告质量。

结果

我们确定了2009年至2019年期间符合纳入标准的177项疫苗成本效益分析(CEA)。其中,98项纳入了意外后果。在总共98项CEA中,总体健康后果类别被纳入73次;生物学类别:群体免疫43次;病原体反应:耐药性15次;交叉保护15次。对于与供应方(卫生系统)类别相关的健康后果,副作用被纳入5次。在非健康需求方(家庭内部),劳动生产率被纳入60次。我们确定了2009年至2019年期间符合纳入标准的29项结核病CEA。其中,6篇文章纳入了劳动生产率,4篇纳入了间接传播效应,1篇纳入了耐药性。在2009年至2019年期间,只有34%的结核病CEA纳入了额外的意外后果,而疫苗CEA的这一比例为55%。

结论

在免疫接种和结核病的经济评估中纳入额外的意外后果仍然有限。经济收益的额外意外后果,如本综述中所研究的那些,尤其是那些发生在卫生系统之外的后果,为分析人员提供了有价值的信息。仍有必要进一步研究评估这些额外意外后果的适当方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f91/8611159/058157c4ea3c/41669_2021_269_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f91/8611159/e21199dc7000/41669_2021_269_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f91/8611159/058157c4ea3c/41669_2021_269_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f91/8611159/e21199dc7000/41669_2021_269_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f91/8611159/058157c4ea3c/41669_2021_269_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Inclusion of Additional Unintended Consequences in Economic Evaluation: A Systematic Review of Immunization and Tuberculosis Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.经济评估中纳入其他意外后果:免疫接种和结核病成本效益分析的系统评价
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Dec;5(4):587-603. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00269-4. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
3
A comprehensive framework for considering additional unintended consequences in economic evaluation.一个用于在经济评估中考虑其他意外后果的综合框架。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Aug 4;18:27. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00218-8. eCollection 2020.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Options for Neuropathic Pain: a Systematic Review.治疗神经性疼痛的各种选择的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 May;37(5):669-688. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-00761-6.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Value in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review of Economic Analyses.口腔颌面外科的价值:经济分析的系统评价
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Nov;75(11):2287-2303. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 18.
7
Inclusion of the value of herd immunity in economic evaluations of vaccines. A systematic review of methods used.将群体免疫的价值纳入疫苗的经济评估中。方法的系统评价。
Vaccine. 2017 Dec 14;35(49 Pt B):6828-6841. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
A Systematic Review of Productivity in Economic Evaluations of Workplace Interventions: A Need for Reporting Criteria?工作场所干预措施经济评估中的生产力系统评价:是否需要报告标准?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Oct;17(5):591-613. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00473-8.
9
Reporting Quality of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Conducted in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.沙特阿拉伯进行的成本效益分析报告质量:系统评价。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 Sep;25:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.12.012. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
10
Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluations of Biological Treatment Sequences for Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Previously Treated with Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs.生物治疗方案在改善中重度类风湿关节炎患者中的应用:一项疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗失败后的经济学评价的系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 May;38(5):459-471. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00887-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and positive externalities of integrated chronic care for adults with major depressive disorder in Malawi (IC3D): a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, controlled trial.马拉维成年人重度抑郁症综合慢性病管理的效果、成本效益和正外部性(IC3D):一项阶梯式、整群随机、对照试验。
Lancet. 2024 Nov 9;404(10465):1823-1834. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01809-9. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Cost-utility analysis of the universal pneumococcal vaccination programme for older adults in Norway.挪威老年人普遍接种肺炎球菌疫苗计划的成本-效用分析。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(6):2101333. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2101333. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost of tuberculosis treatment in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-regression.中低收入国家结核病治疗费用:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 Aug 1;24(8):802-810. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.19.0694.
2
A comprehensive framework for considering additional unintended consequences in economic evaluation.一个用于在经济评估中考虑其他意外后果的综合框架。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Aug 4;18:27. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00218-8. eCollection 2020.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal adult immunization with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) versus current practice in Brazil.
全民破伤风类毒素-白喉-无细胞百日咳联合疫苗(Tdap)免疫接种与巴西现行实践的成本效益分析。
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 3;38(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.100. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
4
Cost effectiveness of dengue vaccination following pre-vaccination serological screening in Sri Lanka.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(6):427-435. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000680. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
5
Cost-effectiveness of childhood pneumococcal vaccination program in Ethiopia: results from a quasi-experimental evaluation.埃塞俄比亚儿童肺炎球菌疫苗接种项目的成本效益分析:一项准实验评估的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):1078. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7423-8.
6
Cost-effectiveness of routine and campaign use of typhoid Vi-conjugate vaccine in Gavi-eligible countries: a modelling study.常规和推广使用伤寒 Vi 结合疫苗在符合 Gavi 资格国家的成本效益:建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;19(7):728-739. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30804-1. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines in Turkish Children.土耳其儿童肺炎球菌结合疫苗的成本效益比较
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Sep;19:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
8
Optimal gender-specific age for cost-effective vaccination with adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine in Chinese adults.在中国成年人中,用含佐剂的带状疱疹亚单位疫苗进行具有成本效益的接种的最佳性别特定年龄。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0210005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210005. eCollection 2019.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatitis B vaccine booster in children born to HBsAg-positive mothers in rural China.中国农村地区 HBsAg 阳性母亲所生儿童乙型肝炎疫苗加强免疫的成本效果分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;78:130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.08.024. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
Economic Analysis of Vaccination Programs: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report.疫苗接种项目的经济学分析:ISPOR 成果研究实践良好报告。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1133-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.005.