Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Sep;65(8):1033-1042. doi: 10.1111/aas.13837. Epub 2021 May 18.
There is a need for standardized and cost-effective identification of frailty risk. The objective was to validate the Hospital Frailty Risk Score which utilizes International Classification Diagnoses in a cohort of older surgical patients, assess the score as an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes and compare discrimination properties of the frailty risk score with other risk stratification scores.
Data were analysed from all patients ≥65 years undergoing primary surgical procedures from 2006-2018. Patients were categorized based on the frailty risk score. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 180-day risk of readmission.
Of 16 793 patients evaluated, 7480 (45%), 7605 (45%) and 1708 (10%) had a low, intermediate and high risk of frailty. There was a higher incidence of 30-day mortality for individuals with intermediate (2.9%) and high (8.3%) compared with low (1.4%) risk of frailty (P < .001 for both comparisons). Similarly, the hazard of readmission within the first 180 days was higher for intermediate (HR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.16-1.34) and high (HR 1.84; 95% CI: 1.66-2.03) compared with low (HR 1.00, P < .001 for both comparisons) risk of frailty. The hazard of long-term mortality was higher for intermediate (HR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.61-1.80) and high (HR 4.16; 95% CI: 3.84-4.49) compared with low (HR 1.00, P < .001 for both comparisons) risk of frailty. Finally, long length of primary hospitalization occurred for 9.3%, 15.0% and 27.3% of individuals with low, intermediate and high frailty risk (P < .001 for all comparisons). A model including age and ASA classification had the best discrimination for 30-day mortality (AUC 0.862; 95% CI: 0.847-0.877).
Our findings suggest that the Hospital Frailty Risk Score might be used to screen older surgical patients for risk of frailty. While only slightly improving prediction of 30-day mortality using the ASA classification, the Hospital Frailty Risk Score can be used to independently classify older patients for the risk of important outcomes using pre-existing readily available electronic data.
需要标准化且具有成本效益的脆弱性风险识别方法。本研究的目的是验证利用国际疾病分类诊断的医院脆弱性风险评分在老年手术患者队列中的适用性,评估该评分作为不良结局的独立风险因素,并比较脆弱性风险评分与其他风险分层评分的区分度。
分析了 2006 年至 2018 年间所有≥65 岁接受主要手术的患者的数据。患者根据脆弱性风险评分进行分类。主要结局是 30 天死亡率和 180 天再入院风险。
在评估的 16793 名患者中,7480 名(45%)、7605 名(45%)和 1708 名(10%)患者的脆弱性风险为低、中、高。与低危(1.4%)相比,中危(2.9%)和高危(8.3%)的 30 天死亡率更高(两者均 P<0.001)。同样,在 180 天内再入院的风险在中危(HR 1.25;95%CI:1.16-1.34)和高危(HR 1.84;95%CI:1.66-2.03)患者中也高于低危(HR 1.00,两者均 P<0.001)。与低危(HR 1.00,两者均 P<0.001)相比,中危(HR 1.70;95%CI:1.61-1.80)和高危(HR 4.16;95%CI:3.84-4.49)患者的长期死亡率更高。最后,低、中、高危脆弱性患者的主要住院时间分别为 9.3%、15.0%和 27.3%(所有比较均 P<0.001)。一个包含年龄和 ASA 分级的模型对 30 天死亡率具有最佳的区分度(AUC 0.862;95%CI:0.847-0.877)。
我们的研究结果表明,医院脆弱性风险评分可能用于筛选老年手术患者的脆弱性风险。虽然使用 ASA 分级仅略微提高了 30 天死亡率的预测能力,但医院脆弱性风险评分可用于使用现有易得的电子数据对老年患者进行重要结局风险的独立分层。