School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Apr;33(2):373-378. doi: 10.1002/hpja.499. Epub 2021 May 20.
To determine if a school-based physical activity (PA) intervention that supported primary school teachers to schedule PA during school hours impacted their own PA.
A 2x2 factorial group cluster-randomised controlled trial was undertaken in 12 Australian primary schools. The nine-month intervention supported classroom teachers to increase scheduled weekly PA for their class via physical education, sport, Energisers and integrated lessons. Teachers' PA (n = 76) was measured at follow-up only using accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X or GT9X). Linear mixed models were used to estimate between-group differences in teachers' mean minutes of sedentary, light, moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) across the school day and during class-time.
At follow-up, there were non-significant between-group differences favouring intervention teachers, compared to controls, for light PA (4.9 minutes, 95% CI: -6.3, 16.0; P = .33) and MVPA (0.4 minutes, 95% CI: -10.9, 11.6; P = .94) across the school day; although not favouring the intervention for sedentary behaviour (5.1 minutes, 95% CI: -11.4, 21.7; P = .48). Similar patterns were seen during class-time for light PA and sedentary time, but not for MVPA.
Supporting teachers with the scheduling of PA for their class may impact on their own PA. Fully powered studies are needed to better understand the impact of the intervention on teachers' PA.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12616001228471 (http://www.anzctr.org.au/).
为了确定一项针对小学生的学校体育活动(PA)干预措施是否能影响教师自身的体育活动水平,该措施旨在支持小学教师在上课时间安排 PA。
在澳大利亚的 12 所小学中进行了一项 2x2 析因群组随机对照试验。为期九个月的干预措施通过体育课、运动、活力课间操和综合课程,支持课堂教师为其班级增加每周计划的 PA。仅在随访时使用加速度计(Actigraph GT3X 或 GT9X)测量教师的 PA(n=76)。使用线性混合模型来估计在整个学校日和课堂时间内,教师的平均久坐时间、低强度 PA、中等到剧烈强度 PA(MVPA)的组间差异。
随访时,与对照组相比,干预组教师的轻 PA(4.9 分钟,95%CI:-6.3,16.0;P=0.33)和 MVPA(0.4 分钟,95%CI:-10.9,11.6;P=0.94)全天差异无统计学意义;尽管对于久坐行为(5.1 分钟,95%CI:-11.4,21.7;P=0.48),干预组并没有表现出优势。在课堂时间内,轻 PA 和久坐时间也呈现出类似的模式,但 MVPA 则不然。
支持教师为其班级安排 PA 可能会影响他们自身的 PA。需要进行充分的研究,以更好地了解干预措施对教师 PA 的影响。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)ACTRN12616001228471(http://www.anzctr.org.au/)。