• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化多策略实施干预措施,以大规模提升学校体育活动政策实施效果:一项随机非劣效试验的结果。

Optimising a multi-strategy implementation intervention to improve the delivery of a school physical activity policy at scale: findings from a randomised noninferiority trial.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW, 1 University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Aug 20;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01345-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-022-01345-6
PMID:35987776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9392334/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To maximise their potential health benefits, school-based physical activity policies need to be implemented at scale. This paper describes the third in a sequence of trials that sought to optimise an effective strategy (PACE) to assist schools' implementation of a physical activity policy. Specifically, it aimed to determine the probability that a multi-strategy intervention adapted to reduce in-person contact (Adapted PACE) was "as good as" the original intervention (PACE) in increasing the weekly minutes of structured physical activity implemented by classroom teachers.

METHODS

A noninferiority cluster randomised controlled trial was undertaken with 48 primary schools in New South Wales, Australia. Schools were randomised to receive PACE or a model with adaptations made to the delivery modes (Adapted PACE). Teachers' scheduled minutes of weekly physical activity was assessed at baseline (Oct 2018-Feb 2019) and 12-month follow-up (Oct-Dec 2019). The noninferiority margin was set at - 16.4 minutes based on previous data and decision panel consensus. A linear mixed model analysed within a Bayesian framework was used to explore noninferiority between the two PACE models. A cost minimisation analysis was conducted from the health service provider perspective, using the Australian dollar (AUD).

RESULTS

The posterior estimate for the between group difference at follow-up was - 2.3 minutes (95% credible interval = - 18.02, 14.45 minutes). There was an estimated 96% probability of Adapted PACE being considered noninferior (only 4% of the posterior samples crossed the noninferiority margin of - 16.4 minutes). That is, the minutes of physical activity implemented by teachers at Adapted PACE schools was not meaningfully less than the minutes of physical activity implemented by teachers at PACE schools. The mean total cost was AUD$25,375 (95% uncertainty interval = $21,499, $29,106) for PACE and AUD$16,421 (95% uncertainty interval = $13,974, $19,656) for Adapted PACE; an estimated reduction of AUD$373 (95% uncertainty interval = $173, $560) per school.

CONCLUSIONS

It is highly probable that Adapted PACE is noninferior to the original model. It is a cost-efficient alternative also likely to be a more suitable approach to supporting large scale implementation of school physical activity policies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001229167).

摘要

背景

为了最大限度地发挥其潜在的健康益处,需要大规模实施基于学校的身体活动政策。本文描述了旨在优化一种有效策略(PACE)以协助学校实施身体活动政策的一系列试验中的第三项研究。具体而言,其目的是确定经改编以减少面对面接触的多策略干预措施(适应性 PACE)在增加课堂教师实施的结构化身体活动的每周分钟数方面与原始干预措施(PACE)“一样好”的可能性。

方法

在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的 48 所小学中进行了非劣效性聚类随机对照试验。学校被随机分配接受 PACE 或对交付模式进行改编的模型(适应性 PACE)。基线(2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 2 月)和 12 个月随访(2019 年 10 月至 12 月)评估教师每周计划的身体活动分钟数。根据先前的数据和决策小组的共识,非劣性边界设定为-16.4 分钟。使用贝叶斯框架内的线性混合模型分析来探索两种 PACE 模型之间的非劣效性。从卫生服务提供者的角度进行成本最小化分析,使用澳元(AUD)。

结果

随访时组间差异的后验估计为-2.3 分钟(95%可信区间=-18.02,14.45 分钟)。适应性 PACE 被认为具有非劣效性的可能性估计为 96%(只有 4%的后验样本越过了-16.4 分钟的非劣效性边界)。也就是说,适应性 PACE 学校的教师实施的身体活动分钟数与 PACE 学校的教师实施的身体活动分钟数没有明显差异。PACE 的平均总成本为 25375 澳元(95%不确定性区间=21499 澳元,29106 澳元),适应性 PACE 的平均总成本为 16421 澳元(95%不确定性区间=13974 澳元,19656 澳元);每所学校估计减少 373 澳元(95%不确定性区间=173 澳元,560 澳元)。

结论

适应性 PACE 极有可能不劣于原始模型。它是一种具有成本效益的替代方案,也可能更适合支持学校身体活动政策的大规模实施。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12619001229167)进行了回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b06/9392334/f07ce9a59b4c/12966_2022_1345_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b06/9392334/65507a43dbf0/12966_2022_1345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b06/9392334/f07ce9a59b4c/12966_2022_1345_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b06/9392334/65507a43dbf0/12966_2022_1345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b06/9392334/f07ce9a59b4c/12966_2022_1345_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimising a multi-strategy implementation intervention to improve the delivery of a school physical activity policy at scale: findings from a randomised noninferiority trial.优化多策略实施干预措施,以大规模提升学校体育活动政策实施效果:一项随机非劣效试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Aug 20;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01345-6.
2
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.
3
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting diet, physical activity, obesity, tobacco or alcohol use.加强实施针对饮食、体育活动、肥胖、烟草或酒精使用的校本政策或做法的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub4.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
6
Learning together for mental health: feasibility of measures to assess a whole-school mental health and wellbeing intervention in secondary schools.共同学习促进心理健康:评估中学全校心理健康与幸福干预措施的可行性
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 25:1-18. doi: 10.3310/GFDT2323.
7
Outcomes of specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder: the Physio4FMD RCT.功能性运动障碍专科物理治疗的效果:Physio4FMD随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(34):1-28. doi: 10.3310/MKAC9495.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Interventions in outside-school hours childcare settings for promoting physical activity amongst schoolchildren aged 4 to 12 years.校外儿童保育环境中促进 4 至 12 岁学童身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;9(9):CD013380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013380.pub2.
10
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的体育活动项目,旨在促进6至18岁儿童和青少年的体育活动及健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Optimising a multi‑strategy implementation intervention to improve the delivery of a school physical activity policy at scale: findings from a randomised noninferiority trial.更正:优化多策略实施干预以大规模改善学校体育活动政策的实施:一项随机非劣效性试验的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Aug 13;22(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01776-x.
2
Exploring the impact of a daily sport uniform policy in primary schools: a qualitative study with students and teachers.探索小学日常运动制服政策的影响:一项针对学生和教师的定性研究。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 14;7:1633045. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1633045. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying essential implementation strategies: a mixed methods process evaluation of a multi-strategy policy implementation intervention for schools.识别基本实施策略:对学校多策略政策实施干预的混合方法过程评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Apr 12;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01281-5.
2
'Snacktivity™' to increase physical activity: Time to try something different?'Snacktivity™' 增加身体活动:是时候尝试一些不同的方法了?
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106851. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106851. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
Lifestyle-integrated functional exercise to prevent falls and promote physical activity: Results from the LiFE-is-LiFE randomized non-inferiority trial.
Prevalence of Physical Activity Initiatives in Australian Primary Schools: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
澳大利亚小学体育活动倡议的普及率:一项横断面调查。
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70071. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70071.
4
Properties of adaptive, cluster-randomised controlled trials with few clusters: a simulation study.具有少量聚类的适应性整群随机对照试验的性质:一项模拟研究。
Implement Sci. 2025 Jul 1;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01443-6.
5
Does optimizing Choose to Move - a health-promoting program for older adults - enhance scalability, program implementation and effectiveness?优化“选择行动”(一项针对老年人的健康促进项目)是否能提高其可扩展性、项目实施效果及有效性?
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Dec 18;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01649-9.
6
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting diet, physical activity, obesity, tobacco or alcohol use.加强实施针对饮食、体育活动、肥胖、烟草或酒精使用的校本政策或做法的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub4.
7
Learning health systems to implement chronic disease prevention programs: A novel framework and perspectives from an Australian health service.学习型卫生系统实施慢性病预防项目:一个新颖的框架及来自澳大利亚一家卫生服务机构的观点
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Oct 15;8(4):e10466. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10466. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
A cross-sectional study assessing modifications to the delivery of a multi-component implementation strategy (the Get Outside, Get Active program) to improve child physical activity in early childhood education and care services.一项横断面研究,评估对多成分实施策略(“走出去,动起来”计划)的交付方式进行的修改,以改善幼儿教育和护理服务中的儿童身体活动情况。
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Apr;36(2):e920. doi: 10.1002/hpja.920. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
9
Learning Health System to rapidly improve the implementation of a school physical activity policy.学习型健康系统以快速改善学校体育活动政策的实施。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jul 31;5(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00619-3.
10
An initial typology of approaches used by policy and practice agencies to achieve sustained implementation of interventions to improve health.政策和实践机构为实现改善健康干预措施的持续实施所采用方法的初步类型学。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Mar 5;5(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00555-2.
生活方式综合功能锻炼预防跌倒和促进身体活动:来自 LiFE-is-LiFE 随机非劣效试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Sep 3;18(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01190-z.
4
Scaling up Action Schools! BC: How Does Voltage Drop at Scale Affect Student Level Outcomes? A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.扩大行动学校规模!BC:规模扩大时电压下降如何影响学生水平的结果?一项整群随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):5182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105182.
5
Multi-strategy intervention increases school implementation and maintenance of a mandatory physical activity policy: outcomes of a cluster randomised controlled trial.多策略干预措施提高了学校强制性体育活动政策的实施和维持:一项群组随机对照试验的结果。
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Apr;56(7):385-393. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103764. Epub 2021 May 26.
6
The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare.FRAME-IS:用于记录医疗保健实施策略修改的框架。
Implement Sci. 2021 Apr 7;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3.
7
How effective are physical activity interventions when they are scaled-up: a systematic review.当体育活动干预措施扩大规模时,其效果如何:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 22;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01080-4.
8
Implementation of a School Physical Activity Policy Improves Student Physical Activity Levels: Outcomes of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.实施学校体育活动政策可提高学生的身体活动水平:一项群组随机对照试验的结果。
J Phys Act Health. 2020 Sep 12;17(10):1009-1018. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0595.
9
Physical activity and health in Chinese children and adolescents: expert consensus statement (2020).中国儿童和青少年身体活动与健康专家共识(2020 年)。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;54(22):1321-1331. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102261. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
Optimal Use of the Non-Inferiority Trial Design.最优非劣效临床试验设计的应用。
Pharmaceut Med. 2020 Jun;34(3):159-165. doi: 10.1007/s40290-020-00334-z.