• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝癌肝移植术后的动态甲胎蛋白反应与结局。

Dynamic α-Fetoprotein Response and Outcomes After Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

机构信息

Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2021 Jun 1;156(6):559-567. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0954.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0954
PMID:33950167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8100910/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Accurate preoperative prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplant is the mainstay of selection tools used by transplant-governing bodies to discern candidacy for patients with HCC. Although progress has been made, few tools incorporate objective measures of tumor biological characteristics, resulting in inclusion of patients with high recurrence rates and exclusion of others who could otherwise be cured.

OBJECTIVE

To externally validate the New York/California (NYCA) score, a recently published multi-institutional US HCC selection tool that was the first model incorporating a dynamic α-fetoprotein response (AFP-R) and compare the validated score with currently accepted HCC selection tools, namely, the Milan Criteria (MC), the French-AFP (F-AFP), and Metroticket 2.0 models.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective, multicenter prognostic analysis of prospectively collected databases of 2236 adults undergoing liver transplant for HCC was conducted at 3 US, 1 Canadian, and 4 European centers from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2013. The AFP-R was measured as the difference between maximum and final pre-liver transplant AFP level. Cox proportional hazards regression and competing risk regression analyses examined recurrence-free and overall survival. Receiver operating characteristic analyses and net reclassification index were used to compare NYCA with MC, F-AFP, and Metroticket 2.0. Data analysis was performed from June 2019 to April 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary study outcome was 5-year recurrence-free survival; overall survival was the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Of 2236 patients, 1808 (80.9%) were men; mean (SD) age was 58.3 (7.96) years. A total of 545 patients (24.4%) did not meet the MC. The NYCA score proved valid on competing risk regression analysis, accurately predicting recurrence-free and overall survival (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence risk in NYCA risk categories was 9.5% for low-, 20.5%, for acceptable-, and 40.5% for high-risk categories; P < .001 for all). The NYCA also predicted recurrence-free survival on a center-specific level: 453 of 545 patients (83.1%) who did not meet MC, 213 of 308 (69.2%) who did not meet the French-AFP, 292 of 384 (76.1%) who did not meet Metroticket 2.0 would be recategorized into NYCA low- and acceptable-risk groups (>75% 5-year recurrence-free survival). The Harrell C statistic for the validated NYCA score was 0.66 compared with 0.59 for the MC and 0.57 for the F-AFP models (P < .001). The net reclassification index for NYCA was 8.1 vs MC, 12.9 vs F-AFP, and 10.1 vs Metroticket 2.0.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study appears to externally validate the importance of AFP-R in the selection of patients with HCC for liver transplant. The AFP-R represents one of the truly objective measures of biological characteristics available before transplantation. Incorporation of AFP-R into selection criteria allows safe expansion of MC and other models, offering liver transplant to patients with acceptable tumor biological characteristics who would otherwise be denied potential cure.

摘要

重要性

准确预测肝癌(HCC)患者肝移植后的复发是移植管理机构用于识别 HCC 患者候选资格的主要选择工具。尽管已经取得了进展,但很少有工具纳入肿瘤生物学特征的客观指标,导致包括复发率高的患者,排除了其他可能治愈的患者。

目的

外部验证纽约/加利福尼亚(NYCA)评分,这是一种最近发表的美国多机构 HCC 选择工具,是第一个纳入动态甲胎蛋白反应(AFP-R)的模型,并将验证后的评分与目前公认的 HCC 选择工具,即米兰标准(MC)、法国 AFP(F-AFP)和 Metroticket 2.0 模型进行比较。

设计、地点和参与者:对 3 个美国、1 个加拿大和 4 个欧洲中心的 2236 例成人 HCC 患者前瞻性收集的数据库进行了回顾性多中心预后分析,这些患者于 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日接受了肝移植。AFP-R 作为最大和最终术前 AFP 水平之间的差异进行测量。Cox 比例风险回归和竞争风险回归分析检测无复发生存和总生存。接受者操作特征分析和净重新分类指数用于比较 NYCA 与 MC、F-AFP 和 Metroticket 2.0。数据分析于 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 4 月进行。

主要结果和措施

主要研究结果是 5 年无复发生存率;总生存率为次要结果。

结果

在 2236 例患者中,1808 例(80.9%)为男性;平均(SD)年龄为 58.3(7.96)岁。共有 545 例(24.4%)不符合 MC。NYCA 评分在竞争风险回归分析中被证明是有效的,准确地预测了无复发生存和总生存(NYCA 风险类别 5 年累积复发风险为低风险组为 9.5%,可接受风险组为 20.5%,高风险组为 40.5%;所有 P<0.001)。NYCA 还在特定中心水平上预测了无复发生存:453 例不符合 MC 的患者(83.1%),308 例不符合 F-AFP 的患者(69.2%),384 例不符合 Metroticket 2.0 的患者(76.1%)将被重新归类为 NYCA 低风险和可接受风险组(>75%的 5 年无复发生存率)。验证后的 NYCA 评分的 Harrell C 统计量为 0.66,而 MC 为 0.59,F-AFP 模型为 0.57(P<0.001)。NYCA 的净重新分类指数为 8.1 比 MC,12.9 比 F-AFP,10.1 比 Metroticket 2.0。

结论和相关性

本研究似乎对外科验证 AFP-R 在 HCC 患者肝移植选择中的重要性进行了验证。AFP-R 是移植前可获得的真正客观的生物学特征之一。将 AFP-R 纳入选择标准可以安全地扩展 MC 和其他模型,为具有可接受肿瘤生物学特征的患者提供肝移植,否则这些患者将被拒绝潜在的治愈机会。

相似文献

1
Dynamic α-Fetoprotein Response and Outcomes After Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝癌肝移植术后的动态甲胎蛋白反应与结局。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jun 1;156(6):559-567. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0954.
2
Is it Time to Abandon the Milan Criteria?: Results of a Bicoastal US Collaboration to Redefine Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Transplantation Selection Policies.是否到了放弃米兰标准的时候了?:美国东西两岸合作重新定义肝细胞癌肝移植选择政策的结果。
Ann Surg. 2018 Oct;268(4):690-699. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002964.
3
Homocysteine: A novel prognostic biomarker in liver transplantation for alpha-fetoprotein- negative hepatocellular carcinoma.同型半胱氨酸:甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌肝移植的新型预后生物标志物。
Cancer Biomark. 2020;29(2):197-206. doi: 10.3233/CBM-201545.
4
Validation of the AFP model as a predictor of HCC recurrence in patients with viral hepatitis-related cirrhosis who had received a liver transplant for HCC.验证 AFP 模型作为预测病毒肝炎相关性肝硬化患者 HCC 复发的指标,这些患者因 HCC 已接受肝移植。
J Hepatol. 2017 Mar;66(3):552-559. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.10.038. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
5
Metroticket 2.0 Model for Analysis of Competing Risks of Death After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Metroticket 2.0 模型分析肝癌肝移植术后死亡的竞争风险。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(1):128-139. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.025. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a model including α-fetoprotein improves the performance of Milan criteria.肝癌肝移植:包含甲胎蛋白的模型可改善米兰标准的性能。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Oct;143(4):986-94.e3; quiz e14-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.052. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
7
Evaluation of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinomas That Do Not Produce α-Fetoprotein.不产生甲胎蛋白的肝细胞癌患者的评估。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jan 1;152(1):55-64. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3310.
8
A novel prognostic nomogram accurately predicts hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: analysis of 865 consecutive liver transplant recipients.一种新型预后列线图可准确预测肝移植后肝细胞癌复发:对865例连续肝移植受者的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):416-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.025. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
9
Alpha-fetoprotein level > 1000 ng/mL as an exclusion criterion for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria.甲胎蛋白水平>1000纳克/毫升作为符合米兰标准的肝细胞癌患者肝移植的排除标准。
Liver Transpl. 2014 Aug;20(8):945-51. doi: 10.1002/lt.23904. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
10
Shadows Behind Using Simple Risk Models in Selection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients for Liver Transplantation.简单风险模型在肝癌患者肝移植选择中的应用所带来的阴影。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003176.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Prognostic Value of AFP and PIVKA-II in HCC After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.甲胎蛋白和异常凝血酶原在活体肝移植后肝癌中的长期预后价值:一项单中心回顾性研究
Transpl Int. 2025 Jun 27;38:14748. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.14748. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and Validation of a Pre-Transplant Risk Score (LT-MVI Score) to Predict Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Candidates for Liver Transplantation.用于预测肝移植候选肝细胞癌患者微血管侵犯的移植前风险评分(LT-MVI评分)的开发与验证
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 24;17(9):1418. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091418.
3
Evolving Transplant Oncology: Evolving Criteria for Better Decision-Making.不断发展的移植肿瘤学:用于更好决策的不断演变的标准。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 24;15(7):820. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070820.
4
New Scenarios in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌肝移植的新情况
Liver Int. 2025 Apr;45(4):e16142. doi: 10.1111/liv.16142. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
5
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 Inhibitor Showed Improved Survival for Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.肝动脉灌注化疗联合乐伐替尼和PD - 1抑制剂可改善浸润性肝细胞癌的生存率:一项多中心队列研究
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Sep 9;11:1727-1740. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S477872. eCollection 2024.
6
Early Changes in Alpha-Fetoprotein and Des-γ-Carboxy Prothrombin Are Useful Predictors of Antitumor Response to Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.甲胎蛋白和去γ-羧基凝血酶原的早期变化是 durvalumab 联合 tremelimumab 治疗晚期肝细胞癌抗肿瘤反应的有用预测指标。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jul 26;31(8):4225-4240. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31080315.
7
Survival benefit of living donor liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.活体肝移植对肝细胞癌患者的生存获益。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01947-8.
8
Dynamic changes of serum α-fetoprotein predict the prognosis of bevacizumab plus immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.血清甲胎蛋白的动态变化预测肝细胞癌中贝伐单抗联合免疫治疗的预后。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):751-760. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001860.
9
Combined transarterial chemoembolization and thermal ablation in candidates to liver transplantation with hepatocellular carcinoma: pathological findings and post-transplant outcome.联合经动脉化疗栓塞和热消融治疗肝癌肝移植候选者:病理发现和移植后结果。
Radiol Med. 2024 Jul;129(7):1086-1097. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01830-x. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
10
Longitudinal analysis of liver transplant candidates for hepatocellular carcinoma in a single center.单中心肝细胞癌肝移植候选者的纵向分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 29;409(1):143. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03336-6.