• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用机器学习方法预测有较高寄养服务“离所”风险的青年。

Predicting youth at high risk of aging out of foster care using machine learning methods.

机构信息

Children's Data Network, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, United States.

Information Sciences Institute and Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, United States.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jul;117:105059. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105059. Epub 2021 May 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105059
PMID:33951553
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Youth who exit the nation's foster care system without permanency are at high risk of experiencing difficulties during the transition to adulthood.

OBJECTIVE

To present an illustrative test of whether an algorithmic decision aid could be used to identify youth at risk of existing foster care without permanency.

METHODS

For youth placed in foster care between ages 12 and 14, we assessed the risk of exiting care without permanency by age 18 based on their child welfare service involvement history. To develop predictive risk models, 28 years (1991-2018) of child welfare service records from California were used. Performances were evaluated using F1, AUC, and precision and recall scores at k %. Algorithmic racial bias and fairness was also examined.

RESULTS

The gradient boosting decision tree and random forest showed the best performance (F1 score = .54-.55, precision score = .62, recall score = .49). Among the top 30 % of youth the model identified as high risk, half of all youth who exited care without permanency were accurately identified four to six years prior to their exit, with a 39 % error rate. Although racial disparities between Black and White youth were observed in imbalanced error rates, calibration and predictive parity were satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study illustrates the manner in which potential applications of predictive analytics, including those designed to achieve universal goals of permanency through more targeted allocations of resources, can be tested. It also assesses the model using metrics of fairness.

摘要

背景

青年在离开国家寄养系统后如果没有永久性住所,他们在成年过渡期间很可能会遇到困难。

目的

展示一个算法决策辅助工具的实例测试,该工具可以用于识别可能在寄养中没有永久性住所的风险青年。

方法

对于 12 至 14 岁被安置在寄养家庭中的青年,我们根据他们的儿童福利服务参与历史评估了在 18 岁前离开寄养而没有永久性住所的风险。为了开发预测风险模型,我们使用了加利福尼亚州 28 年(1991-2018 年)的儿童福利服务记录。使用 F1、AUC 和 k %的精度和召回分数来评估性能。还检查了算法的种族偏见和公平性。

结果

梯度提升决策树和随机森林显示了最佳性能(F1 分数=.54-.55,精度分数=.62,召回分数=.49)。在模型确定为高风险的前 30%的青年中,一半以上的在没有永久性住所的情况下离开寄养的青年在离开前四到六年被准确识别,错误率为 39%。尽管在不平衡错误率中观察到了黑人和白人青年之间的种族差异,但校准和预测均等性得到了满足。

结论

我们的研究说明了预测分析的潜在应用程序的方式,包括那些旨在通过更有针对性地分配资源来实现永久性的普遍目标的应用程序,可以通过使用公平性指标来评估模型。

相似文献

1
Predicting youth at high risk of aging out of foster care using machine learning methods.运用机器学习方法预测有较高寄养服务“离所”风险的青年。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jul;117:105059. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105059. Epub 2021 May 2.
2
Permanency and the Foster Care System.永久性与寄养制度。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2015 Oct;45(10):306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
Exit Outcomes for Probation-Supervised Youth in Foster Care: An Examination of Past Child Protection Involvement.寄养中受监督缓刑青少年的出路结果:对过去儿童保护介入的考察。
Child Maltreat. 2018 Feb;23(1):34-43. doi: 10.1177/1077559517718956. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Family Finding: A Relative Search and Engagement Intervention for Youth Lingering in Foster Care.一项家庭寻找的随机对照试验:一项针对寄养中徘徊青少年的亲属搜索与参与干预措施
Eval Rev. 2017 Dec;41(6):542-567. doi: 10.1177/0193841X17689971. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
5
Defining and achieving permanency among older youth in foster care.界定并实现寄养大龄青少年的永久性安置。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018 Apr;87:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.02.006.
6
RCT of a mentoring and skills group program: placement and permanency outcomes for foster youth.一项指导和技能小组项目的 RCT:寄养青年的安置和永久结果。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e33-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3447. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
7
National training and development curriculum training program impact on placement, permanency, and stability.国家级培训和发展课程培训计划对安置、永久性和稳定性的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Mar;149:106712. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106712. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
8
Foster Care Reentry: A survival analysis assessing differences across permanency type.寄养照料回归:一项生存分析评估不同安置类型的差异。
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Jun;68:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
9
Achieving permanency for LGBTQ youth.为 LGBTQ 青年实现永久性。
Child Welfare. 2006 Mar-Apr;85(2):299-316.
10
Placement Stability, Cumulative Time in Care, and Permanency: Using Administrative Data from CPS to Track Placement Trajectories.安置稳定性、累计照料时间和永久性:利用 CPS 的行政数据跟踪安置轨迹。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 17;14(11):1405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111405.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive risk modeling for child maltreatment detection and enhanced decision-making: Evidence from Danish administrative data.预测风险模型在儿童虐待检测和决策增强中的应用:来自丹麦行政数据的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 10;19(7):e0305974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305974. eCollection 2024.
2
Use of Population-Level Administrative Data in Developmental Science.发育科学中人群水平行政数据的应用。
Annu Rev Dev Psychol. 2022 Dec;4(1):447-468. doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120920-023709. Epub 2022 Sep 14.