• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家级培训和发展课程培训计划对安置、永久性和稳定性的影响。

National training and development curriculum training program impact on placement, permanency, and stability.

机构信息

University of Washington School of Social Work, 4101 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98105-6250, USA.

University of Washington School of Social Work, 4101 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98105-6250, USA.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Mar;149:106712. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106712. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106712
PMID:38401367
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resource parent trainings are an important factor in caregiver readiness and retention, which can improve placement stability and permanency achievement for children and youth, especially those who are marginalized.

OBJECTIVE

Resource parents need access to evidence-based training programs attentive to caring for children and youth from a variety of diverse backgrounds. This study evaluates placement, permanency, and stability outcomes of children whose resource parents were trained in one such program: the National Training and Development Curriculum (NTDC).

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Participants include adults who completed a resource parent training program (N = 3822) and children in their care (N = 2565) in the U.S. states of Florida, Georgia, Illinois, and Missouri.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study involved statistical testing of caregivers and children using AFCARS data. Propensity-score matching was used to control for differences in the child permanency analysis.

RESULTS

With a better understanding of the realities of fostering, NTDC participants were slightly less likely to foster after training (OR = 0.6; p < .001), self-selecting out before taking a child into the home. Those who did foster were more likely to foster a child who is a teen (OR = 1.4; p = .004), Asian/Asian American (OR = 3.8; p = .02), Black/African American (OR = 1.6; p < .001), or Hispanic/Latinx (OR = 1.7; p = .002). Children of NTDC caregivers entered legal adoptions (OR = 2.0; p = .003) and guardianships (OR = 2.9; p = .03) at higher rates than children of comparison caregivers, while rates of reunification (OR = 1.3; p = .11) were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence points to the effectiveness of NTDC in preparing resource parents to provide care for a diverse range of children by age, race, and ethnicity, and for those children to achieve permanency.

摘要

背景

资源家长培训是照顾者准备和保留的重要因素,这可以提高儿童和青少年的安置稳定性和永久性,尤其是那些边缘化的儿童和青少年。

目的

资源家长需要接触到关注照顾来自各种不同背景的儿童和青少年的循证培训计划。本研究评估了接受培训的资源家长的儿童的安置、永久性和稳定性结果:国家培训和发展课程(NTDC)。

参与者和设置

参与者包括在美国佛罗里达州、佐治亚州、伊利诺伊州和密苏里州完成资源家长培训计划(N=3822)的成年人和他们照顾的儿童(N=2565)。

方法

这项准实验研究涉及使用 AFCARS 数据对照顾者和儿童进行统计测试。使用倾向评分匹配来控制儿童永久性分析中的差异。

结果

通过更好地了解寄养的现实情况,NTDC 参与者在培训后稍微不太可能寄养(OR=0.6;p<0.001),在将孩子带回家之前就自行选择退出。那些确实寄养的人更有可能寄养青少年(OR=1.4;p=0.004)、亚裔/亚裔美国人(OR=3.8;p=0.02)、黑人/非裔美国人(OR=1.6;p<0.001)或西班牙裔/拉丁裔(OR=1.7;p=0.002)的孩子。NTDC 照顾者的孩子进入合法收养(OR=2.0;p=0.003)和监护(OR=2.9;p=0.03)的比例高于对照组照顾者的孩子,而 reunification(OR=1.3;p=0.11)的比例则没有统计学上的差异。

结论

有证据表明 NTDC 能够有效地培训资源家长,让他们为不同年龄、种族和族裔的儿童提供照顾,并为这些儿童实现永久性。

相似文献

1
National training and development curriculum training program impact on placement, permanency, and stability.国家级培训和发展课程培训计划对安置、永久性和稳定性的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Mar;149:106712. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106712. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Permanency and the Foster Care System.永久性与寄养制度。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2015 Oct;45(10):306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
Placement Stability, Cumulative Time in Care, and Permanency: Using Administrative Data from CPS to Track Placement Trajectories.安置稳定性、累计照料时间和永久性:利用 CPS 的行政数据跟踪安置轨迹。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 17;14(11):1405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111405.
4
RCT of a mentoring and skills group program: placement and permanency outcomes for foster youth.一项指导和技能小组项目的 RCT:寄养青年的安置和永久结果。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e33-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3447. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
5
Adoption and guardianship: A moderated mediation analysis of predictors of post-permanency continuity.收养与监护:永久性安置后连续性预测因素的调节中介分析
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Mar;85(2):107-18. doi: 10.1037/ort0000019. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
6
Impact of Safe@Home on Placement and Permanency Outcomes: Results of a Quasi-Experimental Study.“居家安全计划”对安置及永久性结果的影响:一项准实验研究的结果
Child Maltreat. 2024 Feb;29(1):202-213. doi: 10.1177/10775595221132220. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
7
Association Between State-Level Criminal Justice-Focused Prenatal Substance Use Policies in the US and Substance Use-Related Foster Care Admissions and Family Reunification.美国州级以刑事司法为重点的产前物质使用政策与物质使用相关的寄养照料入院和家庭团聚之间的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Aug 1;174(8):782-788. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1027.
8
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment.亲属抚养是为了那些因遭受虐待而被带离家庭的儿童的安全、永久性安置和福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD006546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006546.pub2.
9
Permanency and Safety Among Children in Foster Family and Kinship Care: A Scoping Review.寄养和亲属照顾中的儿童的永久性和安全性:范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017 Jul;18(3):268-286. doi: 10.1177/1524838015611673. Epub 2015 Oct 11.
10
Examining the role of methamphetamine in permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption.审视甲基苯丙胺在永久性安置中的作用:关于家庭团聚、监护和收养的竞争风险分析。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Mar;85(2):119-30. doi: 10.1037/ort0000052.