Suppr超能文献

隐私与便利:历史视角、风险分析及信息学行动呼吁。

Privacy versus Convenience: A Historical Perspective, Analysis of Risks, and an Informatics Call to Action.

机构信息

Clinical Informatics, Inc., Woodland, California, United States.

Outcomes Research Network, Research Institute, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Mar;12(2):274-284. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727197. Epub 2021 May 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pace of technological change dwarfs the pace of social and policy change. This mismatch allows for individual harm from lack of recognition of changes in societal context. The value of privacy has not kept pace with changes in technology over time; individuals seem to discount how loss of privacy can lead to directed personal harm.

OBJECTIVE

The authors examined individuals sharing personal data with mobile health applications (mHealth apps) and compared the current digital context to the historical context of harm. The authors make recommendations to informatics professionals to support consumers who wish to use mHealth apps in a manner that balances convenience with personal privacy to reduce the risk of harm.

METHODS

A literature search focused by a historical perspective of risk of harm was performed throughout the development of this paper. Two case studies highlight questions a consumer might ask to assess the risk of harm posed by mobile health applications.

RESULTS

A historical review provides the context for the collective human experience of harm. We then encapsulate current perceptions and views of privacy and list potential risks created by insufficient attention to privacy management.

DISCUSSION

The results provide a historical context for individuals to view the risk of harm and shed light on potential emotional, reputational, economic, and physical harms that can result from naïve use of mHealth apps. We formulate implications for clinical informaticists.

CONCLUSION

Concepts of both harm and privacy have changed substantially over the past 20 years. Technology provides methods to invade privacy and cause harm unimaginable a few decades ago. Only recently have the consequences become clearer. The current regulatory framework is extremely limited. Given the risks of harm and limited awareness, we call upon informatics professionals to support more privacy education and protections and increase mHealth transparency about data usage.

摘要

背景

技术变革的步伐超过了社会和政策变革的步伐。这种不匹配使得由于未能认识到社会背景的变化而导致个人受到伤害。隐私的价值没有随着时间的推移跟上技术的变化;个人似乎没有意识到隐私的丧失如何导致针对个人的伤害。

目的

作者检查了与移动健康应用程序(mHealth 应用程序)共享个人数据的个人,并将当前的数字环境与历史上的伤害环境进行了比较。作者向信息学专业人员提出建议,以支持希望以平衡便利性和个人隐私的方式使用 mHealth 应用程序的消费者,从而降低伤害风险。

方法

通过历史视角对风险进行了重点搜索,贯穿整篇论文的发展。两个案例研究突出了消费者可能会提出的问题,以评估移动健康应用程序带来的伤害风险。

结果

历史回顾为集体人类伤害经验提供了背景。然后,我们总结了当前对隐私的看法和看法,并列出了由于对隐私管理的关注不足而产生的潜在风险。

讨论

研究结果为个人提供了一个历史背景来审视伤害风险,并揭示了可能由于幼稚使用 mHealth 应用程序而导致的潜在情感、声誉、经济和身体伤害。我们为临床信息学专家制定了影响。

结论

在过去的 20 年中,伤害和隐私的概念都发生了重大变化。技术提供了侵犯隐私和造成伤害的方法,这在几十年前是无法想象的。只是最近,后果才变得更加清晰。当前的监管框架极为有限。鉴于伤害风险和有限的意识,我们呼吁信息学专业人员支持更多的隐私教育和保护,并提高 mHealth 对数据使用的透明度。

相似文献

10
Security Concerns in Android mHealth Apps.安卓移动医疗应用中的安全问题。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:645-54. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

10
Information Sharing Preferences of Older Patients and Their Families.老年患者及其家属的信息共享偏好。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1492-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2903.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验