Jimenez Juan Pablo, Altimir Carolina
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health East, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Psychology Department, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago, Chile.
Int J Psychoanal. 2019 Oct;100(5):940-961. doi: 10.1080/00207578.2019.1636253.
This article is devoted to the topic of the conditions for a constructive interdisciplinary dialogue between psychoanalytic theory and practice and research in mind disciplines neighbouring psychoanalysis applied to the concept of psychoanalytic process. The first section reviews the contemporary controversy about psychoanalysis and research and the contributions that different disciplines-such as empirical research in progress in psychotherapy and psychoanalysis, in attachment and the early mother-infant relationship, and neurosciences-propose for the construction of theory in psychoanalysis. The gaps in the scientific investigation of central aspects of the psychoanalytic conception are highlighted, such as the dyadic nature of the construction of the experience in therapy and the relationship between the implicit and explicit levels of the analytic relationship. The article concludes by laying the foundations for a novel research programme for psychoanalysis that addresses the outstanding gaps.
本文致力于探讨精神分析理论与实践以及与精神分析相邻的心智学科研究之间进行建设性跨学科对话的条件这一主题，该对话应用于精神分析过程的概念。第一部分回顾了当代关于精神分析与研究的争议，以及不同学科——如心理治疗与精神分析中的实证研究、依恋与母婴早期关系研究以及神经科学——对精神分析理论构建所做出的贡献。文中强调了精神分析概念核心方面科学研究中的差距，例如治疗中体验构建的二元性质以及分析关系中隐性与显性层面之间的关系。文章最后为一项针对突出差距的精神分析新研究计划奠定了基础。
