Zhao Zhiqing, Ye Zhipeng, Yan Taiqiang, Tang Xiaodong, Guo Wei, Yang Rongli
Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 May 5;19(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02250-1.
Treatments for metastatic fracture of the humeral shaft continue to evolve as advances are made in both oncological and operative management. The purposes of this study were to critically evaluate the effectiveness of intercalary endoprostheses in treating metastatic humeral shaft fractures and to clarify the surgical indications for this technique.
Sixty-three patients treated surgically for 66 metastatic fractures of the humerus shaft were retrospectively reviewed. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) was performed in 16 lesions, plate fixation (PF) in 33 lesions, and prosthetic replacement in 17 lesions. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were noted. The function of the upper extremities was assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. All included patients were followed until reconstructive failure or death.
The operative time was relatively shorter in the prosthesis group than in either the IMN group (p = 0.169) or PF group (p = 0.002). Notably, intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the prosthesis group than in either the IMN group (p = 0.03) or PF group (p = 0.012). The average follow-up time was 20.3 (range, 3-75) months, and the overall survival rate was 59.7% at 12 months and 46.7% at 24 months. One rotator cuff injury, 3 cases of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy, 5 cases of local tumor progression, and 1 mechanical failure occurred in the osteosynthesis group, whereas one case of aseptic loosening of the distal stem and one case of local relapse were observed in the prosthesis group. There were no significant differences in functional scores among the three groups.
Intercalary prosthetic replacement of the humeral shaft may be a reliable solution for pathologic fractures patients; it is indicated for lesions with substantial bone loss, or accompanied soft tissue mass, or for those patients with better prognosis.
随着肿瘤学和手术治疗的进展,肱骨干转移性骨折的治疗方法不断演变。本研究的目的是严格评估节段性人工关节假体治疗肱骨干转移性骨折的有效性,并明确该技术的手术适应证。
回顾性分析63例接受手术治疗的66例肱骨干转移性骨折患者。16例采用髓内钉固定(IMN),33例采用钢板固定(PF),17例采用假体置换。记录手术时间、术中出血量和术后并发症。采用肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会(MSTS)评分和美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评分评估上肢功能。所有纳入患者均随访至重建失败或死亡。
假体组的手术时间比IMN组(p = 0.169)和PF组(p = 0.002)相对较短。值得注意的是,假体组的术中出血量明显少于IMN组(p = 0.03)和PF组(p = 0.012)。平均随访时间为20.3(范围3 - 75)个月,12个月时总生存率为59.7%,24个月时为46.7%。骨固定组发生1例肩袖损伤、3例医源性桡神经麻痹、5例局部肿瘤进展和1例机械性失败,而假体组观察到1例远端柄无菌性松动和1例局部复发。三组功能评分无显著差异。
肱骨干节段性假体置换可能是病理性骨折患者可靠的治疗方法;适用于骨缺损较大、伴有软组织肿块或预后较好的患者。