Norton L W, Zeligman B E, Pearlman N W
Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver 80262.
Arch Surg. 1988 Aug;123(8):947-50. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400320033005.
The success and cost of needle localization biopsy (NLB) performed with local anesthesia in an outpatient procedure room (81 biopsies, group 1) or under general anesthesia in an operating room (36 biopsies, group 2) were compared in a longitudinal study. Only 78% of operations in group 1 successfully removed the target breast lesion; definite failure occurred in 17%, and results were indeterminate in 5%. Among lesions sought by group 2 procedures, 92% of lesions were removed successfully, 5% were missed, and 3% were indeterminate. The incidence of carcinoma in breast specimens was 17% in group 1 and 22% in group 2. Wound infection occurred after 6% of group 1 biopsies. The total cost of NLB was $775 in group 1 and $1960 in group 2. The difference in cost represented by the use of general anesthesia was $1260. The added expense of NLB done in an operating room under general anesthesia can be justified by a high rate of success in removing the breast lesion, by patient comfort, and by technical ease.
在一项纵向研究中,对在门诊手术间进行局部麻醉的针定位活检(NLB,81例活检,第1组)和在手术室进行全身麻醉的针定位活检(36例活检,第2组)的成功率和成本进行了比较。第1组中只有78%的手术成功切除了目标乳腺病变;17%明确失败,5%结果不确定。在第2组手术所探寻的病变中,92%的病变被成功切除,5%被遗漏,3%结果不确定。第1组乳腺标本中癌的发生率为17%,第2组为22%。第1组6%的活检术后发生伤口感染。第1组NLB的总成本为775美元,第2组为1960美元。使用全身麻醉所导致的成本差异为1260美元。在手术室进行全身麻醉下的NLB增加的费用,可通过乳腺病变切除成功率高、患者舒适度高以及操作简便来证明其合理性。