• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期癌症的研究招募因素:姑息治疗预后研究II(PiPS2)——一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究项目。

Study recruitment factors in advanced cancer: the Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2) - a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort project.

作者信息

Kalpakidou Anastasia K, Todd Chris, Omar Rumana Z, Keeley Vaughan, Griffiths Jane, Spencer Karen, Vickerstaff Victoria, Christidoulides Karolina, Perry Rachel, Katsampa Dafni, Stone Patrick

机构信息

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.

Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester School of Health Sciences, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2603-e2610. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002670.

DOI:10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002670
PMID:33952580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11671967/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2) was a large multicentre observational study validating prognostic tools in patients with advanced cancer. Many palliative care studies fail to reach their recruitment target. To inform future studies, PiPS2 rigorously monitored and identified any potential recruitment barriers.

METHODS

Key recruitment stages (ie, whether patients were eligible for the study, approached by the researchers and whether consent was obtained for enrolment) were monitored via comprehensive screening logs at participating sites (inpatient hospices, hospitals and community palliative care teams). The reasons for patients' ineligibility, inaccessibility or decision not to consent were documented.

RESULTS

17 014 patients were screened across 27 participating sites over a 20-month recruitment period. Of those, 4642 (27%) were ineligible for participation in the study primarily due to non-cancer diagnoses. Of 12 372 eligible patients, 9073 (73%) were not approached, the most common reason being a clinical decision not to do so. Other reasons included patients' death or discharge before they were approached by the researchers. Of the 3299 approached patients, 1458 (44%) declined participation mainly because of feeling too unwell, experiencing severe distress or having other competing priorities. 11% (n=1841/17 014) of patients screened were enrolled in the study, representing 15% (n=1841/12 372) of eligible patients. Different recruitment patterns were observed across inpatient hospice, hospital and community palliative care teams.

CONCLUSIONS

The main barrier to recruitment was 'accessing' potentially eligible patients. Monitoring key recruitment stages may help to identify barriers and facilitators to enrolment and allow results to be put into better context.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN13688211.

摘要

目标

姑息治疗预后研究II(PiPS2)是一项大型多中心观察性研究,旨在验证晚期癌症患者的预后工具。许多姑息治疗研究未能达到其招募目标。为指导未来的研究,PiPS2对潜在的招募障碍进行了严格监测和识别。

方法

通过参与研究的机构(住院临终关怀机构、医院和社区姑息治疗团队)的综合筛查日志,对关键招募阶段(即患者是否符合研究条件、研究人员是否接触过患者以及是否获得入组同意)进行监测。记录患者不符合条件、无法接触或决定不同意的原因。

结果

在20个月的招募期内,27个参与研究的机构共筛查了17014名患者。其中,4642名(27%)患者因非癌症诊断而不符合参与研究的条件。在12372名符合条件的患者中,9073名(73%)未被研究人员接触,最常见的原因是临床决定不接触。其他原因包括患者在研究人员接触之前死亡或出院。在3299名被接触的患者中,1458名(44%)拒绝参与,主要原因是感觉身体过于不适、经历严重痛苦或有其他更重要的事情。被筛查的患者中有11%(n = 1841/17014)入组,占符合条件患者的15%(n = 1841/12372)。住院临终关怀机构、医院和社区姑息治疗团队的招募模式各不相同。

结论

招募的主要障碍是“接触到潜在符合条件的患者”。监测关键招募阶段可能有助于识别招募的障碍和促进因素,并使结果能更好地结合实际情况。

试验注册号

ISRCTN13688211。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d2/11671967/11ab126b2e96/bmjspcare-14-e3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d2/11671967/11ab126b2e96/bmjspcare-14-e3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d2/11671967/11ab126b2e96/bmjspcare-14-e3-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Study recruitment factors in advanced cancer: the Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2) - a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort project.晚期癌症的研究招募因素:姑息治疗预后研究II(PiPS2)——一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究项目。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2603-e2610. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002670.
2
Prognostic models of survival in patients with advanced incurable cancer: the PiPS2 observational study.晚期不可治愈癌症患者生存预后模型:PiPS2 观察性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(28):1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta25280.
3
The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): study protocol for a multi-centre, prospective, observational, cohort study.姑息治疗预后研究 II(PiPS2):一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性、队列研究的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Aug 13;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0352-y.
4
Factors affecting recruitment to an observational multicentre palliative care study.影响一项多中心姑息治疗观察性研究招募工作的因素。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013 Sep;3(3):318-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000396. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
5
The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): A prospective observational validation study of a prognostic tool with an embedded qualitative evaluation.姑息治疗预后研究 II(PiPS2):一种预后工具的前瞻性观察验证研究,其中包含定性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0249297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249297. eCollection 2021.
6
The accuracy of clinician predictions of survival in the Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): A prospective observational study.临床医生对预后和姑息治疗研究 II (PiPS2)中患者生存预测的准确性:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0267050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267050. eCollection 2022.
7
The implementation and utility of patient screening logs in a multicentre randomised controlled oncology trial.多中心随机对照肿瘤学试验中患者筛选日志的实施和效用。
Trials. 2020 Jul 8;21(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04559-w.
8
Effect of continuous deep sedation on survival in patients with advanced cancer (J-Proval): a propensity score-weighted analysis of a prospective cohort study.持续深度镇静对晚期癌症患者生存的影响(J-Proval):一项前瞻性队列研究的倾向评分加权分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):115-22. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00401-5. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
9
Optimised clinical study recruitment in palliative care: success strategies and lessons learned.优化姑息治疗临床研究招募:成功策略和经验教训。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;10(2):216-220. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001820. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
10
Recruitment and Reasons for Non-Participation in a Family-Coping-Orientated Palliative Home Care Trial (FamCope).一项以家庭应对为导向的姑息性家庭护理试验(FamCope)的招募情况及未参与原因
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(6):655-74. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2015.1082168.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping patient encounters to identify recruitment timepoints after brain tumour surgery: a cohort and cross-sectional study.绘制患者诊疗过程以确定脑肿瘤手术后的招募时间点:一项队列研究和横断面研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 14;14(2):e003065. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003065.
2
Survivorship research in advanced gynecological cancer: A scoping review of cohort studies.晚期妇科癌症的生存研究:队列研究的范围综述。
Cancer Med. 2023 Dec;12(24):21779-21797. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6744. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): A prospective observational validation study of a prognostic tool with an embedded qualitative evaluation.姑息治疗预后研究 II(PiPS2):一种预后工具的前瞻性观察验证研究,其中包含定性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0249297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249297. eCollection 2021.
2
The use of complementary medicine in palliative care in France: an observational cross-sectional study.法国姑息治疗中补充医学的应用:一项观察性横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4405-4412. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05296-1. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
3
Evaluating recruitment methods of patients with advanced cancer: a pragmatic opportunistic comparison.
评估晚期癌症患者的招募方法:一项务实的机会性比较。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Dec;27(6):536-544. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12562. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
4
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Magnitude of Structural, Clinical, and Physician and Patient Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation.系统评价和荟萃分析癌症临床试验参与的结构、临床以及医生和患者障碍的程度。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Mar 1;111(3):245-255. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy221.
5
The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): study protocol for a multi-centre, prospective, observational, cohort study.姑息治疗预后研究 II(PiPS2):一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性、队列研究的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Aug 13;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0352-y.
6
Duration and determinants of hospice-based specialist palliative care: A national retrospective cohort study.基于临终关怀的专科姑息治疗的持续时间和决定因素:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1322-1333. doi: 10.1177/0269216318781417. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
7
Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement.扩大入选标准以使临床试验更具代表性:美国临床肿瘤学会与癌症研究之友联合研究声明
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3737-3744. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7916. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
8
A Pilot Trial of Early Specialty Palliative Care for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Challenges Encountered and Lessons Learned.早期专科姑息治疗对晚期胰腺癌患者的试点研究:遇到的挑战和吸取的教训。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;21(1):28-36. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0113. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.临床试验参与在癌症研究中的作用:障碍、证据与策略
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:185-98. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_156686.
10
A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research.姑息治疗研究中守门现象原因的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):533-48. doi: 10.1177/0269216315616759. Epub 2015 Nov 17.