• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者 II 期研究(CHANCE-2):一项多中心随机试验的原理和设计。

Clopidogrel with aspirin in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events II (CHANCE-2): rationale and design of a multicentre randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Jun;6(2):280-285. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000791. Epub 2021 May 5.

DOI:10.1136/svn-2020-000791
PMID:33952670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8258075/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with a minor ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), separate trials have shown that dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin (clopidogrel-aspirin) or ticagrelor plus aspirin (ticagrelor-aspirin) are more effective than aspirin alone in stroke secondary prevention. However, these two sets of combination have not been directly compared. Since clopidogrel was less effective in stroke patients who were loss-of-function (LOF) allele carriers, whether ticagrelor-aspirin is clinically superior to clopidogrel-aspirin in this subgroup of patients with stroke is unclear.

AIM

To describe the rationale and design considerations of the Clopidogrel in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE-2) trial.

DESIGN

CHANCE-2 is a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial that compares two dual antiplatelet strategies for minor stroke or TIA patients who are allele carriers: ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 90 mg twice daily on days 2-90) or clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 75 mg daily on days 2-90), plus open-label aspirin with a dose of 75-300 mg on day 1 followed by 75 mg daily on day 2-21. All will be followed for 1 year.

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary efficacy outcome is any stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) within 3 months and the primary safety outcome is any severe or moderate bleeding event within 3 months.

DISCUSSION

The CHANCE-2 trial will evaluate whether ticagrelor-aspirin is superior to clopidogrel-aspirin for minor stroke or TIA patients who are LOF allele carriers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04078737.

摘要

背景

在发生小卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的患者中,单独的试验表明,氯吡格雷加阿司匹林(氯吡格雷-阿司匹林)或替格瑞洛加阿司匹林(替格瑞洛-阿司匹林)双联抗血小板治疗比单独使用阿司匹林在卒中二级预防中更有效。然而,这两种联合方案尚未进行直接比较。由于氯吡格雷在功能丧失(LOF)等位基因携带者的卒中患者中效果较差,替格瑞洛-阿司匹林在这组卒中患者中是否在临床上优于氯吡格雷-阿司匹林尚不清楚。

目的

描述氯吡格雷在高危急性非致残性脑血管事件患者(CHANCE-2)试验中的原理和设计考虑。

设计

CHANCE-2 是一项随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照、多中心试验,比较了两种双重抗血小板策略在携带 等位基因的小卒中和 TIA 患者中的应用:替格瑞洛(第 1 天给予 180 mg 负荷剂量,第 2-90 天给予 90 mg 每日 2 次)或氯吡格雷(第 1 天给予 300 mg 负荷剂量,第 2-90 天给予 75 mg 每日 1 次),加用首日剂量为 75-300 mg 的开放性阿司匹林,第 2-21 天给予 75 mg 每日 1 次。所有患者均随访 1 年。

研究结果

主要疗效终点为 3 个月内任何卒中和(缺血性或出血性),主要安全性终点为 3 个月内任何严重或中度出血事件。

讨论

CHANCE-2 试验将评估替格瑞洛-阿司匹林是否优于氯吡格雷-阿司匹林,用于携带 LOF 等位基因的小卒中和 TIA 患者。

试验注册号

NCT04078737。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/8258075/084e466da315/svn-2020-000791f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/8258075/c957d4f7f21e/svn-2020-000791f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/8258075/084e466da315/svn-2020-000791f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/8258075/c957d4f7f21e/svn-2020-000791f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9017/8258075/084e466da315/svn-2020-000791f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Clopidogrel with aspirin in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events II (CHANCE-2): rationale and design of a multicentre randomised trial.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者 II 期研究(CHANCE-2):一项多中心随机试验的原理和设计。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Jun;6(2):280-285. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000791. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
One-Year Outcomes of Early Therapy With Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Loss-of-Function Carriers With Stroke or TIA Trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗伴有缺血性卒中和 TIA 功能丧失性载脂蛋白 E 突变携带者的一年结局:一项随机临床试验。
Neurology. 2024 Feb 13;102(3):e207809. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207809. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
3
Association of CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Metabolizer Status With Stroke Risk Among Chinese Patients Treated With Ticagrelor-Aspirin vs Clopidogrel-Aspirin: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.CYP2C19 功能丧失型代谢酶携带者状态与替格瑞洛-阿司匹林治疗的中国患者卒中风险的相关性:一项随机临床试验的预设二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317037. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17037.
4
Ticagrelor Aspirin vs Clopidogrel Aspirin in Loss-of-Function Carriers With Minor Stroke or TIA Stratified by Risk Profile.替格瑞洛阿司匹林与氯吡格雷阿司匹林在伴有小卒中或 TIA 的功能丧失型携带者中的应用:基于风险特征的分层研究
Neurology. 2023 Jan 31;100(5):e497-e504. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201454. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
5
Ticagrelor plus aspirin versus clopidogrel plus aspirin for platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: open label, blinded endpoint, randomised controlled phase II trial.替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的血小板反应:开放标签、盲终点、随机对照二期试验。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 6;365:l2211. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2211.
6
Time Course for Benefit and Risk With Ticagrelor and Aspirin in Individuals With Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Who Carry CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Alleles: A Secondary Analysis of the CHANCE-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.携带 CYP2C19 功能缺失等位基因的急性缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者使用替格瑞洛和阿司匹林的获益和风险的时间进程:CHANCE-2 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Aug 1;79(8):739-745. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1457.
7
Genotype-Guided Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack With a Single Small Subcortical Infarction.单发小皮质下梗死的轻型卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作的基因型指导双联抗血小板治疗。
Neurology. 2023 Apr 18;100(16):e1643-e1654. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206775. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
8
Rationale and design of a randomised double-blind 2×2 factorial trial comparing the effect of a 3-month intensive statin and antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute mild ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA with intracranial or extracranial atherosclerosis (INSPIRES).随机双盲 2×2 析因试验的原理和设计,比较急性轻度缺血性卒中和伴有颅内或颅外动脉粥样硬化的高危 TIA 患者 3 个月强化他汀和抗血小板治疗的效果(INSPIRES)。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023 Jun;8(3):249-258. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-002084. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
9
Effects of remnant cholesterol on the efficacy of genotype-guided dual antiplatelet in loss-of -function carriers with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a post-hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.残余胆固醇对轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作功能丧失携带者中基因分型指导的双重抗血小板疗效的影响:CHANCE-2试验的事后分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Dec 2;67:102357. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102357. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Impact of body mass index on efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack.体重指数对小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷疗效和安全性的影响。
CMAJ. 2023 Jul 10;195(26):E897-E904. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230262.

引用本文的文献

1
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA stratified by age and renal function: CHANCE-2 trial substudy.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在按年龄和肾功能分层的卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作功能丧失携带者中的比较:CHANCE-2试验子研究
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2526684. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2526684. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel resistance genotype testing after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and economic model.缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作后氯吡格雷抵抗基因型检测的临床和成本效益:系统评价和经济模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Sep;28(57):1-194. doi: 10.3310/PWCB4016.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Analytical validation of GMEX rapid point-of-care genotyping system for the CHANCE-2 trial.CHANCE-2 试验中 GMEX 即时床边快速基因分型系统的分析验证。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Jun;6(2):274-279. doi: 10.1136/svn-2021-000874. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
Antiplatelet Treatment to Prevent Early Recurrent Stroke.预防早期复发性卒中的抗血小板治疗
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):276-278. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2018927.
3
Ticagrelor and Aspirin or Aspirin Alone in Acute Ischemic Stroke or TIA.替卡格雷与阿司匹林或阿司匹林单用在急性缺血性卒中和 TIA。
The Influence of Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol on the Efficacy of Genotype-Guided Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Preventing Stroke Recurrence.
非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇对基因导向双重抗血小板治疗预防卒中复发疗效的影响
J Stroke. 2024 May;26(2):231-241. doi: 10.5853/jos.2024.00367. Epub 2024 May 30.
4
Superficial Temporal Artery-to-Middle Cerebral Artery Bypass in Ischemic Stroke With Blood Pressure-Dependent Symptoms.用于治疗伴有血压依赖性症状的缺血性卒中的颞浅动脉至大脑中动脉搭桥术
Cureus. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):e56236. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56236. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Differential effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel by homocysteine levels on risk of recurrent stroke: a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.依同型半胱氨酸水平比较替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对复发性卒中风险的差异作用:CHANCE-2 试验的事后分析。
CMAJ. 2024 Feb 11;196(5):E149-E156. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231262.
6
Efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in the elderly for stroke prevention: a subgroup analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.双联抗血小板治疗在老年人群预防卒中的疗效和安全性:CHANCE-2 试验的亚组分析。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Nov 5;9(5):541-550. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-002450.
7
Effects of remnant cholesterol on the efficacy of genotype-guided dual antiplatelet in loss-of -function carriers with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a post-hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.残余胆固醇对轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作功能丧失携带者中基因分型指导的双重抗血小板疗效的影响:CHANCE-2试验的事后分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Dec 2;67:102357. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102357. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack With Intracranial Artery Stenosis: A Post Hoc Analysis of CHANCE-2.替卡格雷与氯吡格雷在伴有颅内动脉狭窄的小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作中的疗效比较:CHANCE-2 的事后分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Nov 7;12(21):e031611. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031611. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
9
Comparative effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy versus monotherapy in patients with ischemic stroke.双联抗血小板治疗与单药治疗对缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效比较。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2023 Oct;28(4):220-226. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2023.4.20230021.
10
CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles and use of omeprazole or esomeprazole increase the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients using clopidogrel.CYP2C19 失活等位基因和奥美拉唑或埃索美拉唑的使用会增加使用氯吡格雷的患者发生心血管结局的风险。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct;16(10):2010-2020. doi: 10.1111/cts.13608. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):207-217. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916870.
4
Efficacy of Clopidogrel for Prevention of Stroke Based on Allele Status in the POINT Trial.基于 POINT 试验中基因等位基因状态的氯吡格雷预防卒中的疗效。
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2058-2065. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028713. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
5
Ticagrelor plus aspirin versus clopidogrel plus aspirin for platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: open label, blinded endpoint, randomised controlled phase II trial.替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的血小板反应:开放标签、盲终点、随机对照二期试验。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 6;365:l2211. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2211.
6
Five-Year Risk of Stroke after TIA or Minor Ischemic Stroke.短暂性脑缺血发作或小面积缺血性脑卒中后 5 年内的脑卒中风险。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 7;378(23):2182-2190. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802712. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk TIA.氯吡格雷和阿司匹林在急性缺血性卒中和高风险 TIA 中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):215-225. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800410. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
Ticagrelor in Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack in Asian Patients: From the SOCRATES Trial (Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Treated With Aspirin or Ticagrelor and Patient Outcomes).替格瑞洛用于亚洲患者急性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作:来自SOCRATES试验(阿司匹林或替格瑞洛治疗急性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作及患者预后)
Stroke. 2017 Jan;48(1):167-173. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014891. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
9
Genetic Polymorphisms and Clopidogrel Efficacy for Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.遗传多态性与氯吡格雷对急性缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2017 Jan 3;135(1):21-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024913. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
10
Association Between CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Allele Status and Efficacy of Clopidogrel for Risk Reduction Among Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.CYP2C19 失活等位基因状态与氯吡格雷降低小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者风险的疗效之间的关系。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):70-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8662.