• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依同型半胱氨酸水平比较替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对复发性卒中风险的差异作用:CHANCE-2 试验的事后分析。

Differential effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel by homocysteine levels on risk of recurrent stroke: a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology (A. Wang, Tian, Xie, H. Li, Jing, Lin, Yilong Wang, Zhao, Z. Li, Liu, Yongjun Wang, Meng), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (A. Wang, Tian, Xie, H. Li, Jing, Lin, Yilong Wang, Zhao, Z. Li, Liu, Yongjun Wang, Meng), Beijing, China; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology (A. Wang), Beijing, China; Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics (Tian), School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Stroke Trials Unit, Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience (Bath), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection (Yongjun Wang), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Department of Neurology (A. Wang, Tian, Xie, H. Li, Jing, Lin, Yilong Wang, Zhao, Z. Li, Liu, Yongjun Wang, Meng), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (A. Wang, Tian, Xie, H. Li, Jing, Lin, Yilong Wang, Zhao, Z. Li, Liu, Yongjun Wang, Meng), Beijing, China; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology (A. Wang), Beijing, China; Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics (Tian), School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Stroke Trials Unit, Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience (Bath), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection (Yongjun Wang), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2024 Feb 11;196(5):E149-E156. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231262.

DOI:10.1503/cmaj.231262
PMID:38346785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10861269/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elevated homocysteine levels are associated with increased blood coagulation and platelet activity and may modulate the response to antiplatelet therapies. We aimed to investigate the effects of homocysteine levels on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) versus clopidogrel-ASA among patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried loss-of-function alleles.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 (The Clopidogrel in High-risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II) trial. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with ticagrelor-ASA or clopidogrel-ASA. We categorized participants into groups with elevated and non-elevated homocysteine levels, based on the median level. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent stroke within 90-day follow-up. The primary safety outcome was severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 2740 participants were randomly assigned to receive ticagrelor-ASA and 2700 to receive clopidogrel-ASA. Use of ticagrelor-ASA was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke among participants with elevated homocysteine levels (74 [5.3%] v. 119 [8.5%]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.81), but not among those with non-elevated levels (86 [6.4%] v. 87 [6.7%]; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71-1.32; = 0.04 for interaction). When analyzed as a continuous variable, the benefits of ticagrelor-ASA with regard to recurrent stroke increased as homocysteine levels increased ( = 0.04 for interaction). No significant interaction between homocysteine levels and treatment with regard to severe or moderate bleeding was observed ( = 0.7 for interaction). We found a significant interaction between homocysteine levels and therapy with regard to recurrent stroke in females ( = 0.04 for interaction) but not males.

INTERPRETATION

In comparison with clopidogrel-ASA, ticagrelor-ASA conferred more benefit to patients with elevated homocysteine levels, particularly to female patients, in this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial involving patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT04078737.

摘要

背景

同型半胱氨酸水平升高与血液凝固和血小板活性增加有关,可能调节抗血小板治疗的反应。我们旨在研究同型半胱氨酸水平对携带功能丧失等位基因的小卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中替格瑞洛-乙酰水杨酸(ASA)与氯吡格雷-ASA 疗效和安全性的影响。

方法

我们对 CHANCE-2(氯吡格雷在急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者中的应用-2)试验进行了事后分析。参与者被随机分配接受替格瑞洛-ASA 或氯吡格雷-ASA 治疗。我们根据中位数水平将参与者分为同型半胱氨酸水平升高和非升高组。主要疗效终点是 90 天随访期间的复发性卒中。主要安全性终点是 90 天内严重或中度出血。

结果

共有 2740 名参与者被随机分配接受替格瑞洛-ASA 治疗,2700 名接受氯吡格雷-ASA 治疗。同型半胱氨酸水平升高的参与者中,替格瑞洛-ASA 的使用与复发性卒中风险降低相关(74[5.3%]例比 119[8.5%]例;风险比[HR]0.60,95%置信区间[CI]0.45-0.81),但同型半胱氨酸水平非升高的参与者中则不然(86[6.4%]例比 87[6.7%]例;HR 0.97,95%CI 0.71-1.32;交互检验 P=0.04)。当作为连续变量进行分析时,随着同型半胱氨酸水平的升高,替格瑞洛-ASA 降低复发性卒中的获益增加(交互检验 P=0.04)。未观察到同型半胱氨酸水平与治疗严重或中度出血之间存在显著的交互作用(交互检验 P=0.7)。我们发现,在女性患者中,同型半胱氨酸水平与治疗之间与复发性卒中存在显著的交互作用(交互检验 P=0.04),但在男性患者中则不然。

解释

在这项涉及小卒中和 TIA 患者的随机对照试验的二次分析中,与氯吡格雷-ASA 相比,替格瑞洛-ASA 为同型半胱氨酸水平升高的患者,特别是女性患者,带来了更大的益处。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,编号 NCT04078737。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4435/10861269/5ec609491cb9/196e149f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4435/10861269/2587fe1b9930/196e149f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4435/10861269/c9e1e74dbf48/196e149f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4435/10861269/5ec609491cb9/196e149f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4435/10861269/2587fe1b9930/196e149f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4435/10861269/c9e1e74dbf48/196e149f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4435/10861269/5ec609491cb9/196e149f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel by homocysteine levels on risk of recurrent stroke: a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.依同型半胱氨酸水平比较替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对复发性卒中风险的差异作用:CHANCE-2 试验的事后分析。
CMAJ. 2024 Feb 11;196(5):E149-E156. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231262.
2
Impact of body mass index on efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack.体重指数对小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷疗效和安全性的影响。
CMAJ. 2023 Jul 10;195(26):E897-E904. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230262.
3
Ticagrelor Aspirin vs Clopidogrel Aspirin in Loss-of-Function Carriers With Minor Stroke or TIA Stratified by Risk Profile.替格瑞洛阿司匹林与氯吡格雷阿司匹林在伴有小卒中或 TIA 的功能丧失型携带者中的应用:基于风险特征的分层研究
Neurology. 2023 Jan 31;100(5):e497-e504. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201454. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
4
Association of CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Metabolizer Status With Stroke Risk Among Chinese Patients Treated With Ticagrelor-Aspirin vs Clopidogrel-Aspirin: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.CYP2C19 功能丧失型代谢酶携带者状态与替格瑞洛-阿司匹林治疗的中国患者卒中风险的相关性:一项随机临床试验的预设二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317037. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17037.
5
One-Year Outcomes of Early Therapy With Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Loss-of-Function Carriers With Stroke or TIA Trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗伴有缺血性卒中和 TIA 功能丧失性载脂蛋白 E 突变携带者的一年结局:一项随机临床试验。
Neurology. 2024 Feb 13;102(3):e207809. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207809. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
6
Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack With Intracranial Artery Stenosis: A Post Hoc Analysis of CHANCE-2.替卡格雷与氯吡格雷在伴有颅内动脉狭窄的小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作中的疗效比较:CHANCE-2 的事后分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Nov 7;12(21):e031611. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031611. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
7
Ticagrelor-Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel-Aspirin Among Loss-of-Function Carriers With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack in Relation to Renal Function: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CHANCE-2 Trial.替格瑞洛-阿司匹林与氯吡格雷-阿司匹林在肾功能相关的小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作的功能丧失型载体中的比较:CHANCE-2 试验的事后分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Nov;175(11):1534-1542. doi: 10.7326/M22-1667. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
Time Course for Benefit and Risk With Ticagrelor and Aspirin in Individuals With Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Who Carry CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Alleles: A Secondary Analysis of the CHANCE-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.携带 CYP2C19 功能缺失等位基因的急性缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者使用替格瑞洛和阿司匹林的获益和风险的时间进程:CHANCE-2 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Aug 1;79(8):739-745. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1457.
9
Dual Antiplatelet Therapies and Causes in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Prespecified Analysis in the CHANCE-2 Trial.双联抗血小板治疗与小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作的病因:CHANCE-2 试验的预先设定分析。
Stroke. 2023 Sep;54(9):2241-2250. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.042233. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
10
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Loss-of-Function Carriers with Stroke or TIA.替卡格雷与氯吡格雷在伴有卒中和 TIA 的功能丧失型携带者中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 30;385(27):2520-2530. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111749. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
When viral myocarditis meets thrombosis tendency: deep analysis of a complex case report.当病毒性心肌炎遇上血栓形成倾向:一份复杂病例报告的深入分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 20;12:1641074. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1641074. eCollection 2025.
2
The types and durations of antiplatelet drugs for symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery stenosis: a retrospective study.有症状的椎基底动脉狭窄抗血小板药物的类型和疗程:一项回顾性研究。
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 3;16:1553459. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1553459. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Maternal genetic polymorphisms in the major mitotic checkpoint genes and associated with the risk of survival in abnormal chromosomal fetuses.主要有丝分裂检查点基因中的母体遗传多态性与染色体异常胎儿的生存风险相关。
Front Genet. 2023 Mar 16;14:1105184. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1105184. eCollection 2023.
2
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Loss-of-Function Carriers with Stroke or TIA.替卡格雷与氯吡格雷在伴有卒中和 TIA 的功能丧失型携带者中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 30;385(27):2520-2530. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111749. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
3
Homocysteine: Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Role in Disease.
同型半胱氨酸:生物化学、分子生物学及在疾病中的作用。
Biomolecules. 2021 May 15;11(5):737. doi: 10.3390/biom11050737.
4
Clopidogrel with aspirin in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events II (CHANCE-2): rationale and design of a multicentre randomised trial.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者 II 期研究(CHANCE-2):一项多中心随机试验的原理和设计。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Jun;6(2):280-285. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000791. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
Impact of renin angiotensin system inhibitors on homocysteine levels and platelets reactivity in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对双联抗血小板治疗患者同型半胱氨酸水平和血小板反应性的影响。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Apr 9;31(4):1276-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
6
A 5-Decade Analysis of Incidence Trends of Ischemic Stroke After Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.一项长达 5 年的分析:短暂性脑缺血发作后缺血性卒中发病趋势:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jan 1;78(1):77-87. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3627.
7
Homocysteine Level Predicts Response to Dual Antiplatelet in Women With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Subanalysis of the CHANCE Trial.同型半胱氨酸水平预测女性小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者对双联抗血小板治疗的反应:CHANCE 试验的亚组分析。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020 Mar;40(3):839-846. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313741. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
8
Homocysteine levels and platelet reactivity in coronary artery disease patients treated with ticagrelor.在接受替格瑞洛治疗的冠心病患者中同型半胱氨酸水平与血小板反应性。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Feb 10;30(2):292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
9
Outcomes Associated With Clopidogrel-Aspirin Use in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Pooled Analysis of Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Non-Disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) and Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trials.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林用于轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作的疗效:氯吡格雷用于急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者(CHANCE)及新发性短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度缺血性卒中血小板靶向抑制(POINT)试验的汇总分析
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1466-1473. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2531.
10
Ticagrelor plus aspirin versus clopidogrel plus aspirin for platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: open label, blinded endpoint, randomised controlled phase II trial.替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的血小板反应:开放标签、盲终点、随机对照二期试验。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 6;365:l2211. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2211.