• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双联抗血小板治疗与单药治疗对缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效比较。

Comparative effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy versus monotherapy in patients with ischemic stroke.

机构信息

From the Department of Pharmacy (Algarni), King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from the Department of Pharmacy Practice (Althagafi, Alshehri, Alshibani), Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and from the College of Pharmacy (Alshargi), Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2023 Oct;28(4):220-226. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2023.4.20230021.

DOI:10.17712/nsj.2023.4.20230021
PMID:37844946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10827028/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of aspirin-clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin or clopidogrel antiplatelet monotherapy (AM) in patients with ischemic stroke.

METHODS

It was a single-center, retrospective cross-sectional study of medical records of ischemic stroke patients admitted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital between January 2015 and October 2019. The primary endpoints were ischemic stroke recurrence, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality between DAPT and AM. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were employed in univariate and multivariate time-to-event analyses.

RESULTS

The median time to recurrence of ischemic stroke was 15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.586-23.01) for DAPT and 20.4 months (95% CI, 9.872-30.928) for the AM. The median survival time until all-cause mortality was 8.0 months (95% CI, 2.893-13.107) for DAPT and 14.1 months (95% CI, 8.173-19.97) for the AM. No statistically significant reductions in the instantaneous risks of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 0.59-2.72; =0.54), re-hospitalization (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59-1.48; = 0.77), and mortality (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.48-2.26; =0.92) were found between the DAPT and AM groups.

CONCLUSION

The DAPT was not superior to AM in reducing recurrence and mortality events in patients with ischemic stroke. Rehospitalization due to the sequelae of the composite of stroke, angina, and myocardial infarction was higher in the DAPT group.

摘要

目的

比较缺血性脑卒中患者应用阿司匹林-氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)与阿司匹林或氯吡格雷单药抗血小板治疗(AM)的疗效。

方法

这是一项单中心、回顾性、病历交叉研究,纳入 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院住院的缺血性脑卒中患者。主要终点为 DAPT 与 AM 之间缺血性脑卒中复发、再住院和全因死亡率。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和 Cox 比例风险分析进行单因素和多因素生存时间分析。

结果

DAPT 组缺血性脑卒中复发的中位时间为 15.0 个月(95%CI,8.586-23.01),AM 组为 20.4 个月(95%CI,9.872-30.928)。DAPT 组全因死亡的中位生存时间为 8.0 个月(95%CI,2.893-13.107),AM 组为 14.1 个月(95%CI,8.173-19.97)。DAPT 组与 AM 组之间,复发的即时风险(风险比 [HR],1.27;95%CI,0.59-2.72;=0.54)、再住院(HR,0.95;95%CI,0.59-1.48;=0.77)和死亡率(HR,1.04;95%CI,0.48-2.26;=0.92)均无统计学显著差异。

结论

DAPT 并不能降低缺血性脑卒中患者的复发和死亡事件。DAPT 组因中风、心绞痛和心肌梗死的复合后遗症再住院的发生率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/10827028/20aff652a5df/Neurosciences-28-4-220_3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/10827028/c19735206b56/Neurosciences-28-4-220_1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/10827028/7be8552aa5f6/Neurosciences-28-4-220_2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/10827028/20aff652a5df/Neurosciences-28-4-220_3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/10827028/c19735206b56/Neurosciences-28-4-220_1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/10827028/7be8552aa5f6/Neurosciences-28-4-220_2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/10827028/20aff652a5df/Neurosciences-28-4-220_3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy versus monotherapy in patients with ischemic stroke.双联抗血小板治疗与单药治疗对缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效比较。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2023 Oct;28(4):220-226. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2023.4.20230021.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Mild-to-Moderate Acute Ischemic Stroke According to the Risk of Recurrent Stroke: An Analysis of 15 000 Patients From a Nationwide, Multicenter Registry.根据复发性中风风险比较阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗在轻度至中度急性缺血性中风中的有效性:对来自全国多中心登记处的15000名患者的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006474. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006474. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
3
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Diabetics With Multivessel Disease Undergoing CABG: FREEDOM Insights.多血管病变行 CABG 的糖尿病患者中双联抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗的比较:FREEDOM 研究结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 17;69(2):119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.043.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute, Nonminor Stroke: A Nationwide, Multicenter Registry-Based Study.双联抗血小板治疗(阿司匹林+氯吡格雷)与阿司匹林单药治疗急性非小卒中的疗效比较:一项全国多中心基于注册登记的研究。
Stroke. 2019 Nov;50(11):3147-3155. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026044. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
Clinical Effects of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy after Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack, a Meta-Analysis.急性小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作后双联抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗的临床效果:一项荟萃分析。
Curr Pharm Des. 2021;27(40):4140-4146. doi: 10.2174/1381612827666210728102459.
6
[Retrospective cohort study for the impact on readmission of patients with ischemic stroke after treatment of aspirin plus clopidogrel or aspirin mono-therapy].[阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷或阿司匹林单药治疗对缺血性中风患者再入院影响的回顾性队列研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Jun 18;48(3):442-7.
7
Duration of dual antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠脉综合征患者氯吡格雷和阿司匹林双联抗血小板治疗的持续时间。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Apr;35(15):969-78. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht438. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
Comparison of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients With Minor Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Network Meta-analysis.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗轻型缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者的比较:一项网状荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Feb 1;79(2):141-148. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4514.
9
Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后序贯氯吡格雷与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗对 PCI 患者心脑血管及出血事件的影响:STOPDAPT-2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2414-2427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145.
10
Efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in the elderly for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双联抗血小板治疗在老年人群预防卒中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Neurol. 2018 Oct;25(10):1276-1284. doi: 10.1111/ene.13695. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Antiplatelet Therapy for Atherothrombotic Disease in 2022-From Population to Patient-Centered Approaches.2022年动脉粥样硬化血栓形成性疾病的抗血小板治疗——从群体到以患者为中心的方法
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 28;9:805525. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.805525. eCollection 2022.
2
Oral antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中的口服抗血小板治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 14;1(1):CD000029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000029.pub4.
3
Antiplatelet drugs for secondary prevention in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
抗血小板药物治疗缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者的二级预防:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Neurol. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02341-2.
4
2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.《2021年卒中与短暂性脑缺血发作患者卒中预防指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会指南》
Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):e364-e467. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000375. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
Benefits and Risks of Dual Versus Single Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review for the 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack.双联抗血小板治疗与单联抗血小板治疗用于二级卒中预防的获益与风险:对《2021年卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者卒中预防指南》的系统评价
Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):e468-e479. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000377. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Clopidogrel with aspirin in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events II (CHANCE-2): rationale and design of a multicentre randomised trial.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者 II 期研究(CHANCE-2):一项多中心随机试验的原理和设计。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Jun;6(2):280-285. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000791. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
Survival analysis-part 2: Cox proportional hazards model.生存分析 - 第2部分:Cox比例风险模型。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;37(2):229-233. doi: 10.1007/s12055-020-01108-7. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Mild-to-Moderate Acute Ischemic Stroke According to the Risk of Recurrent Stroke: An Analysis of 15 000 Patients From a Nationwide, Multicenter Registry.根据复发性中风风险比较阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗在轻度至中度急性缺血性中风中的有效性:对来自全国多中心登记处的15000名患者的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006474. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006474. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
9
Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Ischemic Stroke.缺血性卒中后双联抗血小板治疗的应用
Stroke. 2020 May;51(5):e78-e80. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028400. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
10
Mortality and recurrent vascular events after first incident stroke: a 9-year community-based study of 0·5 million Chinese adults.首次脑卒中后死亡率和复发性血管事件:一项针对 50 万中国成年人的 9 年社区为基础的研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e580-e590. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30069-3.