Hussain Zain, Khan Jawad, Ali Shaheer
Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 28;15:1763-1774. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S298700. eCollection 2021.
Collectively, choroidal cancers represent a vast array of histopathologically diverse constituencies with profound repercussions related to mortality and metastasis. Prognosticated factors provide utility in determining clinical management and outcome propensities. To date, measures to collectively characterize choroidal cancers as a class are not impressive. This study aims to shed light on the affiliation of age and therapeutic modalities to survival in patients diagnosed with choroidal cancers.
Cohort analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, a freely accessible population-based database, was executed from 1975 to 2016, a 41-year time window. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression assessed survival with age and various therapeutic modalities as primary independent variables. Adjustment for several demographical and clinical variables was performed.
This cohort consisted of 7722 patients at the time of diagnosis. Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated increased cause-specific hazards of 71.8% for patients aged 75+ years (HR = 1.718, CI 1.155-2.555, p < 0.008) as compared to patients aged 0-24 years. 16.2% and 58.0% increases in cause-specific mortality were showcased in patients diagnosed with 8770/3: mixed epithelioid and spindle cell melanoma (HR = 1.16, p = 0.029) and 8771/3: epithelioid cell melanoma of the choroid (HR = 1.580, p < 0.001) compared to individuals diagnosed with 8720/3: malignant melanoma NOS of the choroid. Chemotherapy significantly influenced survival in patients with choroidal cancers compared to those who did not receive chemotherapy or had an unknown status (HR = 0.377, CI 0.292-0.486, p < 0.001).
Like most cancers, choroidal cancers showcase poor clinical trajectory with advanced age. Specific ICD-O-3 histological subtypes predispose to increased mortality. Therapeutic modalities such as radioactive implants and chemotherapeutic agents demonstrate decreased cause-specific mortality compared to alternative treatments. Altogether, nuanced influences of age and therapy are revealed when evaluating choroidal cancers as a class, irrespective of subtype.
脉络膜癌总体上代表了一系列组织病理学上多样的类型,与死亡率和转移有着深远的影响。预后因素有助于确定临床管理和预后倾向。迄今为止,将脉络膜癌作为一个类别进行总体特征描述的措施并不理想。本研究旨在阐明年龄和治疗方式与脉络膜癌患者生存率之间的关系。
使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划进行队列分析,该计划是一个可免费获取的基于人群的数据库,时间跨度为1975年至2016年,共41年。单变量和多变量Cox回归以年龄和各种治疗方式作为主要自变量评估生存率。对几个人口统计学和临床变量进行了调整。
该队列在诊断时包括7722名患者。多变量Cox回归显示,与0 - 24岁的患者相比,75岁及以上的患者特定病因风险增加了71.8%(HR = 1.718,CI 1.155 - 2.555,p < 0.008)。与诊断为8720/3:脉络膜恶性黑色素瘤,未特指的患者相比,诊断为8770/3:混合性上皮样和梭形细胞黑色素瘤(HR = 1.16,p = 0.029)和8771/3:脉络膜上皮样细胞黑色素瘤(HR = 1.580,p < 0.001)的患者特定病因死亡率分别增加了16.2%和58.0%。与未接受化疗或化疗状态未知的患者相比,化疗对脉络膜癌患者的生存率有显著影响(HR = 0.377,CI 0.292 - 0.486,p < 0.001)。
与大多数癌症一样,脉络膜癌在老年时临床病程不佳。特定的ICD - O - 3组织学亚型易导致死亡率增加。与其他治疗方法相比,放射性植入物和化疗药物等治疗方式显示出特定病因死亡率降低。总体而言,在将脉络膜癌作为一个类别进行评估时,无论亚型如何,年龄和治疗的细微影响都得以揭示。