Doctor Erika L, Lehman Melissa, Korte Cassandra S
College of Arts and Sciences, Lynn University, Boca Raton, FL 33431.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021 Mar 31;22(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2573. eCollection 2021.
Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) provide students with ample opportunity to engage in the scientific process and are increasingly replacing more traditional cookbook-style laboratory exercises in the undergraduate biology curriculum. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the difficulty of implementing these projects during times of crisis. The quick transition to online learning during the pandemic afforded us a unique opportunity to develop an alternative version of our CURE for the online environment and to compare the efficacy of our CURE on learning gains in online versus in-person learning situations. Compared with a previous semester, our data suggest no significant differences in learning gains between students who participated in a hands-on CURE and an online CURE. Taken together the data suggests an avenue for CURE implementation even while teaching in online or hybrid formats. We discuss strategies that made the CURE successful in the online format and offer suggestions for how to adapt such activities for online or hybrid courses.
基于课程的本科研究经历(CUREs)为学生提供了充分参与科学过程的机会,并且在本科生物学课程中越来越多地取代了更为传统的照方抓药式实验室练习。新冠疫情凸显了在危机时期实施这些项目的困难。疫情期间迅速向在线学习的转变为我们提供了一个独特的机会,来开发我们的CURE在在线环境中的替代版本,并比较我们的CURE在在线学习与面对面学习情况下对学习成果的效果。与上一学期相比,我们的数据表明,参与实践CURE和在线CURE的学生在学习成果上没有显著差异。综合来看,这些数据表明,即使是以在线或混合形式教学,也有实施CURE的途径。我们讨论了使CURE在在线形式下取得成功的策略,并就如何将此类活动改编用于在线或混合课程提供了建议。