Suppr超能文献

揭开影响与同行评审的面纱。

Lifting the lid on impact and peer review.

作者信息

Clift Joseph, Cooke Anne, Isles Anthony R, Dalley Jeffrey W, Henson Richard N

机构信息

British Neuroscience Association, Bristol, UK.

MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Brain Neurosci Adv. 2021 Apr 11;5:23982128211006574. doi: 10.1177/23982128211006574. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

has grown in tandem with the British Neuroscience Association's campaign to build Credibility in Neuroscience, which encourages actions and initiatives aimed at improving reproducibility, reliability and openness. This commitment to credibility impacts not only what the Journal publishes, but also how it operates. With that in mind, the Editorial Board sought the views of the neuroscience community on the peer review process, and on how they should respond to the Journal Impact Factor that will be assigned to . In this editorial, we present the results of a survey of neuroscience researchers conducted in the autumn of 2020 and discuss the broader implications of our findings for the Journal and the neuroscience community.

摘要

它与英国神经科学协会旨在建立神经科学可信度的活动同步发展,该活动鼓励采取旨在提高可重复性、可靠性和开放性的行动及倡议。这种对可信度的承诺不仅影响该期刊的发表内容,也影响其运作方式。考虑到这一点,编辑委员会征求了神经科学界对同行评审过程以及如何应对将分配给该期刊的期刊影响因子的意见。在这篇社论中,我们展示了2020年秋季对神经科学研究人员进行的一项调查结果,并讨论了我们的研究结果对该期刊和神经科学界的更广泛影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c89/8044561/ac281184ae6c/10.1177_23982128211006574-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Lifting the lid on impact and peer review.
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2021 Apr 11;5:23982128211006574. doi: 10.1177/23982128211006574. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Creating a more inclusive journal: the 's evolving process for selecting editorial board members.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):1-4. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1430.
3
Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Sep 30;15:55. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-55.
6
Welcome to molecular brain.
Mol Brain. 2008 Jun 17;1:1. doi: 10.1186/1756-6606-1-1.
7
Editorial.
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2009 Jan;14(1):1-2.
8
Towards an open science publishing platform.
F1000Res. 2016 Feb 3;5:130. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7968.1. eCollection 2016.
10
Re: Journal Standards - Editor's reply.
N Z Vet J. 2003 Aug;51(4):199. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2003.36367.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on cognition and brain in the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience cohort.
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2020 Oct 7;4:2398212820961704. doi: 10.1177/2398212820961704. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0228914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228914. eCollection 2020.
3
Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal.
Nature. 2019 May;569(7758):621-623. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01643-3.
4
Publish peer reviews.
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7720):545-547. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06032-w.
5
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 13;12(12):e0189311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189311. eCollection 2017.
6
Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12708-12713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707323114. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Feb;38(2):230-235. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5017. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.
Nature. 2015 Apr 23;520(7548):429-31. doi: 10.1038/520429a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验