Fleming Patricia A, Wentzel Jacobus J, Dundas Shannon J, Kreplins Tracey L, Craig Michael D, Hardy Giles E St J
Centre for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Perth, WA, 6150, Australia.
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 1447 Forest Road, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Oct;96(5):1744-1768. doi: 10.1111/brv.12725. Epub 2021 May 5.
Significant portions of the world's forests have been impacted by severe and large-scale tree declines characterised by gradual but widespread loss of vigour and subsequent death of either single or several tree species. Tree deaths represent a threat for fauna that are dependent on forest habitats for their survival. Although tree declines have received considerable scientific attention, surprisingly, little is known about their impacts on fauna. In total, we calculated 631 effect sizes across 59 studies that quantified the impact of tree declines on animal abundance. Data representing 186 bird species indicated an overall increase in bird abundance in response to tree declines (meta-analysis mean ± estimation g = 0.172 ± 0.053 [CI 0.069 to 0.275], P = 0.001); however, there was substantial variability in responses (significant heterogeneity P < 0.001) with a strong influence of diet as well as nesting guild on bird responses. Granivores (especially ground-foraging species, e.g. Passerellidae species), bark-foraging insectivores (e.g. woodpeckers), as well as ground- and cavity-nesting species apparently benefitted from tree declines, while nectarivorous birds [and, although not significant, aerially foraging insectivores (e.g. flycatchers) and leaf-gleaning insectivores (canopy-feeding)] were less common in the presence of tree declines. Data representing 33 mammal species indicate a tendency for detrimental effects of tree declines on mammals that use trees as refuges, while aerial foragers (i.e. bats) may benefit from opening up the canopy. Overall the average effect for mammals was neutral (meta-analysis mean estimation g = -0.150 ± 0.145 [-0.433 to 0.134], P = 0.302). Data representing 20 reptile species showed an insufficient range of responses to determine any diet or foraging effect on their responses. Data for 28 arthropod taxa should be considered with caution, as we could not adequately separate taxa according to their specialisations and reliance on key habitat. The data broadly suggest a detrimental effect of tree declines (meta-analysis mean estimation g = -0.171 ± 0.072 [-0.311 to -0.031], P = 0.017) with ground-foraging arthropods (e.g. detritivores and predators such as spiders and centipedes) more likely to be detrimentally impacted by tree declines. The range of responses to tree declines signifies substantially altered animal communities. In many instances, altered ecosystem function due to loss of key animal services will represent a significant threat to forest health.
世界上很大一部分森林受到了严重且大规模的树木衰退影响,其特征是树木活力逐渐但广泛丧失,随后单个或多个树种死亡。树木死亡对依赖森林栖息地生存的动物构成了威胁。尽管树木衰退已受到相当多的科学关注,但令人惊讶的是,人们对其对动物的影响知之甚少。我们总共计算了59项研究中的631个效应量,这些研究量化了树木衰退对动物数量的影响。代表186种鸟类的数据表明,鸟类数量总体上因树木衰退而增加(荟萃分析均值±估计g = 0.172±0.053 [置信区间0.069至0.275],P = 0.001);然而,反应存在很大差异(显著异质性P < 0.001),饮食以及筑巢类群对鸟类反应有很大影响。食谷动物(尤其是地面觅食物种,如雀科物种)、树皮觅食食虫动物(如啄木鸟)以及地面和树洞筑巢物种显然从树木衰退中受益,而食蜜鸟类[以及,虽然不显著,但空中觅食食虫动物(如鹟科)和树叶觅食食虫动物(树冠觅食)]在树木衰退的情况下不太常见。代表33种哺乳动物的数据表明,树木衰退对将树木用作避难所的哺乳动物有不利影响的趋势,而空中觅食者(即蝙蝠)可能从树冠的开放中受益。总体而言,哺乳动物的平均效应是中性的(荟萃分析均值估计g = -0.150±0.145 [-0.433至0.134],P = 0.302)。代表20种爬行动物的数据显示,反应范围不足以确定对其反应的任何饮食或觅食效应。28个节肢动物类群的数据应谨慎考虑,因为我们无法根据其专业化程度和对关键栖息地的依赖程度充分区分类群数据大致表明树木衰退有不利影响(荟萃分析均值估计g = -0.171±0.072 [-0.311至-0.031],P = 0.017),地面觅食节肢动物(如腐食动物和捕食者,如蜘蛛和蜈蚣)更有可能受到树木衰退的不利影响。对树木衰退的反应范围表明动物群落发生了重大变化。在许多情况下,由于关键动物服务丧失导致的生态系统功能改变将对森林健康构成重大威胁。