Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Oct;10(10):1188-1197. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.952. Epub 2021 May 6.
The neuroprotective agent edaravone is an intravenous treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. As intravenous administration burdens patients, orally administered treatments are needed. This phase 1, open-label, single-dose crossover study in 42 healthy adults evaluated bioequivalence of a 105-mg edaravone oral suspension and intravenous edaravone (60 mg/60 min). The evaluation was whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of the maximum plasma concentration (C ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable time point and to infinity of unchanged edaravone were between the bioequivalence limit of 0.80 and 1.25. Metabolic profiles and elimination pathways were also compared between the 2 routes. Geometric mean ratios and 90%CIs of area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable time point and to infinity for unchanged edaravone satisfied bioequivalence limits. The geometric mean ratio and its lower limit of 90%CI of C of the 105-mg oral suspension compared with 60-mg intravenous formulations for unchanged edaravone fell within bioequivalence limits. Both formulations showed triphasic plasma concentration-time profiles of unchanged edaravone after reaching C . Plasma concentrations of edaravone inactive metabolites after oral administration were higher than with intravenous administration. Edaravone in both routes underwent urinary excretion, mainly as the glucuronide conjugate and, to a lesser extent, as the sulfate conjugate. Urinary excretion of unchanged edaravone was low, and urinary relative composition ratios of unchanged edaravone and metabolites were similar for both formulations. These findings showed equivalent exposure of the 105-mg oral suspension of edaravone to the 60-mg intravenous formulation, supporting further investigation of the oral suspension for treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
依达拉奉是一种神经保护剂,用于治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症。由于静脉注射会给患者带来负担,因此需要口服治疗药物。本研究在 42 名健康成年人中开展了一项 1 期、开放标签、单次交叉研究,旨在评估 105mg 依达拉奉口服混悬液与静脉注射用依达拉奉(60mg/60 分钟)的生物等效性。评价指标为,以 0.80 至 1.25 为生物等效性边界,比较 90%置信区间(CI)是否落在未改变的依达拉奉的最大血浆浓度(C )和从 0 到最后可量化时间点和无穷大的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积的比值。还比较了两种途径的代谢谱和消除途径。从 0 到最后可量化时间点和无穷大的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积的未改变的依达拉奉的几何均数比值和 90%CI 均符合生物等效性标准。与静脉制剂 60mg 相比,105mg 口服混悬液的未改变的依达拉奉的 C 的几何均数比值及其 90%CI 的下限落在生物等效性范围内。两种制剂的未改变的依达拉奉在达到 C 后均表现出三相血浆浓度-时间曲线。与静脉给药相比,口服给药后依达拉奉无活性代谢物的血浆浓度更高。两种途径的依达拉奉均经尿液排泄,主要以葡萄糖醛酸结合物的形式,其次以硫酸结合物的形式。未改变的依达拉奉的尿液排泄量较低,两种制剂的未改变的依达拉奉和代谢物的尿液相对组成比相似。这些发现表明,105mg 口服混悬液的暴露量与 60mg 静脉制剂相当,支持进一步研究该口服混悬液治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症。